How porn made it happy and gay



By now many of you must have seen the new TV advertisements on the new-look Hindustan Times. They’re cool – and this one is my favourite.

[flv:http://images.blogs.hindustantimes.com/turned-on/post/ht-ad.flv 320 240]

To use a cliché — yes we have come a long way.

Is it only me, or does everybody feel that suddenly things are moving rapidly. I mean after decades and decades of refusing to accept homosexuality, there is spurt of change. Of course it all started with that momentous decision of the High Court on Article 377 (please read that judgement – it is a piece of art) – but is now quickly followed by the government’s decision not to challenge it in the Supreme Court.

That isn’t all. Now the Health Ministry is going to start an awareness campaign on gay issues! It would seem that finally Ghulam Nabi Azad – besides suffering from foot-in-the-mouth disease – is finally getting some sensible work done. Just think, one year ago, all this would have been simply unthinkable.

What has brought about this change in ourselves…how have we suddenly come to terms and become comfortable with an alternate sexuality? Of course, there are a huge number of factors that have contributed to this change. But what would you say if I told you that gay porn has played a major role in establishing a gay identity and changing sexual styles. This is the main argument of a book titled “Bigger than Life” written by Jeffrey Escoffier that I’d read recently.

Escoffier, a noted gay intellectual and activist, lucidly argues that this billon dollar industry created space for increased experimentation with a large array of sexualities that were not organised around procreation and reproduction. Escofier believes that sexual revolution in the US in the sixties and the seventies wouldn’t have taken place if not for the series of extended legal battles over obscenity and pornography. These battles over porn helped establish a safe space where new sexuality could be portrayed in a very blunt and honest matter.

Gay porn, he writes, in many ways was a saviour in those dark days of living inside a closet. The porn industry, working in a grey market, helped provide explicit representations of gay sexual behaviour not otherwise available. And the simple availability of these images helped the gay community to help affirm their nascent gay identity.

Not only did it help with identity, but with time the gay porn industry reflected the issues that the community was grappling with and became an effective communication mode. Case in point: the early AIDS epidemic. Escoffier writes: “As the AIDS epidemic devastated the lives of gay men, more gay men were choosing to stay at home and pornography than go out to cruise for sex.” In many ways it curbed promiscuity.

But more importantly, porn also took upon itself to communicate important social messages of the time. Many gay porn stars insisted that pornography had a mission to eroticise condom use as an integral and necessary part of sexual play, and became crusaders for safe sex. By the 90s, all gay producers prescribed the usage of condoms.

Escoffier’s book is a great study of the history of gay porn and how integral it was for the gay movement. Interestingly, in partnership with the Adult Entertainment Business he has set up a website named after his book where one can view many of the classic films he writes about in his book. Check it out here.

Afterthought: While the book stops in the 90s, what interesting to note is what is happening to gay porn today. AIDS is no longer the dreaded disease – and many young gay men believe they are invincible to the infection. As a result, there is a huge demand and proliferation of bareback (non-condom) gay porn. Isn’t it time the gay porn industry to once again reflect on what kind of sexual practices they are advocating to young people who are just about starting to explore their sexuality?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 4.56 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • vishrant

    a thought troubles me. what if being gay, or being champion of homosexuality was not in fashion in USA. does india then have has the guts to go ahead and pass the law.

    you know there is a mind set. america is the bench mark of liberals. what ever happens in america has a validity. so if homosexuality is vauge in america. anybody in india, talking or saying anything against it, will look like a fool.

    wow, what a freedom of thought we have. alleluia

    [Reply]

    natasha Reply:

    I haven’t seen much gay porn — but the idea that porn helped the gay movement interests me. Larry Flint and Hugh Hefner were icons in their own right fighting for applying the First Amendment to their businesses. Much of pornography helped women to fight the usual stereotyping too. So three cheers for porn!

    [Reply]

    Tia Reply:

    I dont understand why people fail to realize that homosexuality has existed as an option to man long before any legal system was even put in place. Infact, before the British raj, neither homosexuality / bisexuality / x-dressing / transgenders were considered punishable offenses. It was the archaic and inane victorian rule that brought about the biases and taboos in these spheres.
    (The same Victorian rule, influenced by a church that criminalized hetero sex by unmarried couples, burnt “alleged” prostitutes alive, propagated masochism as a means to be “one with God” by feeling Jesus’ pain…)
    With the British raj came the criminalization of alternate sexuality, the social/economic downfall of the Hijras (a class exalted by our ancient rulers), and along with it all open acceptance to things natural and honest to one’s heart.
    I think it is about time we abandon these unevolved and shallow “enforced” laws, and revert to our rich social heritage that was way ahead of its time and highly revered by other ancient cultures worldwide.

    [Reply]

    rakesh Reply:

    Mayank,what Rhea possibly meant could be that the porn presents the physical aspect of the thing in such details which are not always possible in routine,on the bed.But then,rhea what would be its attractiveness if its not raunchy.I am sure a lot of people get inspiration to perform better by watching a nice porn material of their choice.I have found it wonderful and helpful at many times when it helped me in getting in shape within a short period and satisfy my partner.Needless to say,its sensible to treat porn just an entertainment so that it doesnt enter our heads.

    [Reply]

    Naomi Reply:

    I agree. However, I am completely in favour of the abolishment of the law that made being gay illegal in India as there are too many closet gays or secret gays who are marrying women here, but actually being gay. I cannot imagine what it would be like to marry someone you love and then discover they are gay and then have to pretend to be happily married while your husband sneaks off to meet gay men. Hopefully if it were to become more acceptable to be gay in India, then gay men would be more open and not end up ruining women’s lives in this way.

    [Reply]

    Arjita Gupta Reply:

    I truly agree

  • Nutsure

    Every porn has some degree of Gay or lesbian material. The thought however is frightening. Because one third of porn is paedophilac. At this rate the paedophils will be legal.

    [Reply]

  • rhea singh

    Homosexuality has been made legal and I guess there is nothing wrong about the decision. But whether things are moving rapidly, I am not at all sure. You see, you are talking about a miniscule educated, liberal class of people here. There are many people who are educated but not liberal.

    If you want some idea as to what Indians really think, trawl through the TOI blogs on the subject and the comments posted there. TOI caters to the LCD, so the views reflected there are an indication of sorts.

    Social change and its acceptance comes from within an individual, no law can alter mindsets.

    Natasha, maybe saying three cheers for porn is taking it a bit too far, since porn insults the sanctity of human realationships.

    [Reply]

    Mayank Reply:

    I believe we have to reach a comfortable state of mind with regards to porn. I disagree that it insults sanctity of human relations..

    [Reply]

  • vina

    when can we expect your next poost?

    [Reply]

  • Anjali

    Great post!

    [Reply]

  • vijay kumar

    Societies which have rampant homosexuality are alos suffering from falling populations.

    It seemsz in the evolutionary ycle, such societies are not very desirable.

    So legalize homosexuality and go extinct…

    That is what is going to happen
    ..

    [Reply]

    rakesh Reply:

    Most people believe that afghanistan and arab countries have maximum homosexuality,but population is increasing.on the other hand,japan and norway etc have not much homosexuality and still population is decreasing.please comment.

    [Reply]

  • vijay kumar

    Rakesh,

    Arab and Afghanistan have not legalised homosexuality for one. It is all clandestine and happens probably because of non availibility of females to talk too and have a relationship with.

    Anyway in fifty years time, Indians and Chinese would be flooding the world. The rest of the world can have handjobs and homosexuality but will be exticnt like tigers and dinosaurs. Good luck to them…
    .
    :)

    [Reply]

  • http://www.urstickets.com Hindustan Times

    I dont understand why people fail to realize that homosexuality has existed as an option to man long before any legal system was even put in place. Infact, before the British raj, neither homosexuality / bisexuality / x-dressing / transgenders were considered punishable offenses. It was the archaic and inane victorian rule that brought about the biases and taboos in these spheres.
    ……………….
    Joy

    [Reply]

  • Brian

    Indians have forgotten even the heroes of the Kargil war. What hope do WWII veterans have?

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    I think Mirza Ghalib would be more acceptable to all Indians as a national symbol – for his poetry is far more universal and humanitarian than any other poet – and Urdu is understood anywhere in India (though people tend to call it Hindustani for various reasons), which is not the case with Bengali.

    [Reply]

  • Shyam7310

    mercedes R class, vw jetta due to their pricing

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/naturerules Balaji Babu

    I am balaji from chennai. I own a beat diesel and I am not a previous owner of indica(i had a getz 2005). I can say the refinement is better if not best compared to a swift or micra.. but still even the polo’s engine has a clatter which is similar to beat and i dont find any difference between these two as far as the refinement goes… If you talk about high speed, then there is no diesel engine of its capacity to compare with, as in a 1 liter engine(its actually 936 CC) you cant expect it to perform like a 1.3/1.4. I believe GM is fine withe sales of BEAT diesel, as only after the launch of this diesel version beat started to clock around 5000 cars rather it was 1500 on average considering the Petrol/LPG alone.
    so is the EON worth the money that is paid for? or whether it has the best of fuel economy, built, drive ability, ergonomics and cost? I see that its top end model is almost 4.5 lacs in chennai. Do you think eon has a better refinement overall? As a package at their own segments and cost, i feel BEAT is better car than the EON and if you have not driven an EON, please try it once.
    Again coming to the price, the entry model of figo diesel is 5.5 L on road chennai whereas Beat is 5.03, its almost 50K difference and this continues for all the variants. If 50K is not a difference at all, I would like to say that the budget interval between a wagonR(1 Liter VXi) and a Ritz(1.2 Liter LXi) is a meagre 20K. With ABS version of WagonR you need to spend more than the Ritz Lxi. So certainly 50K is a better difference and any consumer will realize on the date of delivery. Beat is better built, good interiors and better plastics than the ford figo and comparing it with Figo itself will solve the purpose of GM’s idea of BEAT diesel. When a car like EON which is noisy and has a vibrating gear lever with a lousy 3 pot IRDE version engine can be tagged at 4.5 lacs why not the beat with good built and better plastics and good steering/clutch assembly with the 1 liter derivation of the famous FIAT engine should not be priced 50K lesser than the competition? On a lighter note, if the engine is approx 500 CC less you want it to be at half price of Figo? :-)

    [Reply]

    Mohan Sharma Reply:

    Very nicely put Balaji, I believe Beat is a great car in its class and very well packaged compared to its competitors. The best part of what i found out in the car was its effortless drivability in the city. :)

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002582675712 Rocco Hunter

    WTF !! :-/

    according to wt basis is d fiesta worst performer ???
    it has got luks, performance, handling, built quality, gud avg .
    jus bcoz its priced at a bit high price doesnt means dat its an worst performer
    dear writer,
    i think according to u, best cars are bad design, bad handling, poor safety, poor built qualtiy n GOOD MILEAGE + LOW PRICING = BEST CAR !

    [Reply]

  • Nitin

    Either you guys have not seen any car, or some company has bribed you all to do this review.. I can agree on Aria, but all the other cars are really good and they deserve respect.. What are the parameters based on which you have judged the cars..Agree with Rocco…

    [Reply]

  • Mohan Sharma

    Hi Sumant

    Really great post i must say, 2011 has been a year of many hits and misses.

    I do agree with the list of cars you mentioned and there has been minimal success whatsoever in terms of “making” it in the market. But I would also disagree with the mention od Chevrolet Beat Diesel being on the list. My Uncle got hold of one last month after careful consideration among many other competitors, and he is very happy with its peformence.

    Yes it has a small engine for a diesel but a 19+ mileage in practical city driving conditions surely takes the cake. It came pretty well packaged for a diesel car under 5 lakhs. Personally i felt the engine a little sluggish but it surprisingly had very less vibrations. And i think GM is doing okay in the sales front for this car.

    I am little surprised to see the New Fiesta in the list, ddnt expect it to do this poorly.

    Mohan

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    I’ve bookmarked this because I found it interesting. I would be very interested to hear more news on this. Thanks!

    [Reply]

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XAVBIBSZW4ITEUU7A4MJXBIXVU Saahil

    Well, a perfect analysis.. But have a point, instead of going in for the new car, still the best priced cars are now available dirt cheap if you enter the used car market. Whats the harm in having a Honda City of 2009 at under Rs. 5 Lacs.. The car is less driven, maintained and by sure now will attract less depreciation from current price as already 3 -3.5 lacs eroded in first 2 years.. Got the latest stock at:- http://www.usedcarindelhi.com

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/kumaril.bhowmick Kumaril Bhowmick

    Maruti Kizashi……. 300 for a maruti car is unforgiving faliure

    [Reply]

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_URSXATBEMZ7HUAB3OH36PLYWDM Ashok

    There is no justification for inordinately delayed deliveries and humongous cost escalations. In principle there should be no hesitation in encouraging private shipyards to share the burden ( pie ? ). As far as competing with China is concerned, we should be realistic in dealing with a nation whose economy is three times larger.

    [Reply]

  • Sobin John

    This is the problem with all the Indians (including me) we will all sit down and take doctorate on finding problems and issues all year along. Now listen we have enough problems and issues would guys like you stop writing articles like this and write some thing positive at least for the sake of men and women in uniform.
    Thank you all. Sobin John

    [Reply]

  • Krishna

    This writer is correct. One fine morning, we will end up having chunks of Arunachal under chinese. The present govt is stupid and is simply not up to the task. Indian should make a strong link with the US, in the similar fashion as UK. There is real appreciation for India in the US, both the political class and the people. India has been squandering this intent and goodwill.

    [Reply]

  • sanjeeb

    what do u mean….ur comment is vague ……pl be clear to start a discussion……

    [Reply]

  • sanjeeb

    It is only my view….one day we will be over run be china…..our leaders will flee and poor country men/women will be left….may sound ridiculous but it is true….we are surrounded by pakis and Chinese…..our strategists r not up to the mark thinker and our ladders are busy making money…..GOD SAVE US….

    [Reply]

  • PatriotIndian

    The only solution in India is education. If everyone is educated properly and armed with technical usable skills that would solve half the misery in the globe.

    [Reply]

  • junior consultant Daxue

    Thanks for this both informative and insightful article. This is a report I posted recently about the influences, characteristics, and negative effects of FDI in China from foreign countries. you can find it http://daxueconsulting.com/fdi-in-china/, Hope to exchange ideas.

    [Reply]

  • ved

    It was Nehru’s timidity and stupidity that we lost 1962 border skirmish.China was allowed to dictate the battle as well as the ceasefire. It was allowed to withdraw with a medal just as indian army was preparing to meet and challenge the invader.Why did we accept the ceasefire.? We should have continued the conflict. China had no stomach to continue for long. Nehru also had another hunchback-Krishna Menon who coild not distinguish between a revolver and a pistol. With these two jokers at the helm great Indian army had to bite dust. Shame.

    [Reply]

  • AjaySingh

    India need to show the world, how to become part of the emerging world. China is not a treat that we need to contain. China is fighting for her own survival. With every day passing by, China feels trapped and isolated. There is no need to isolate any nation. Competition is always good. Sit like civilized people and divide what products they can have the market for. And what they can provide market as far as Indian products are concerned. In the end, if the business relations are strong enough, there will be no need for containment policy.
    India can never contain any nation other than Andaman Nicobar !
    Don’t even try to think you are pleasing any other nation by writing such articles. No body is stupid these days. Spread fragrance by rich Indian values, that will work in the end as containment.

    [Reply]

    serenity Reply:

    u r right bro!!! ol nations r familiar to the internal structure of india…weak structure of india n i dont know about the containment by china but our nation is definitely going to collapse due to the internal demonic faces of politicians…i hate this phase that indiia is going thru…none is loyal,joblessness,extreme loads of rapes, abducions,extortions n dumb dead eyed police with having control of their balls to their ministers…really F*** them off……

    [Reply]

  • Col. P.S. Sandhu

    All experts who are credible are of the opinion that 2012 is not 1962. India clearly has an edge over China militarily.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Superb and
    timely article.

    China’s support
    to Pakistan and Sri Lanka does not serve any of China’s interests — except that
    of encircling India and ‘putting India in her place’. Myanmar learnt China’s
    intentions in time and is coming closer to the US. China’s chauvinism is challenged by Japan,
    Vietnam, Philippines and South Korea. An alarmed Australia has recalibrated her
    military ties with the US publicly — to
    warn China. Even Vietnam is warming up to the United States. It is time India
    joins the littoral States of China and the US in a ‘formal’ alliance. It is
    better to be proactive than react after the event.

    China’s
    Indian lobbyists of today do not even have the ‘cover’ of ‘ideology’, their
    compatriots had in 1962! It is business now!

    [Reply]

  • serenity

    omg..dont compare india to china at least…i cant believe it india being a democratic have left with nothing like democracy..n bro if u believe in facts and figures u can check it out the dam-breaking figures of molestation, rapes,abductions,riots n CORRUPTION…our country is on the peak of declining…china is one of the advanced n developed nations full of justice,law n strength..they dont decieve their citizens by doing scams,disorder in law,,,n a long list….how many scams u heard of them…they dot afraid of the corrupt arsed nations like india…globally indians are disliked nowadays just cus of the illiterates,greedy n brainless politicians mass…

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Have you checked out the figures for crimes in China bro?? Just because you see big buildings and highways doesn’t make a nation a “developed” nation when people still can’t own land or move freely insider their own country!
    LoL full of justice and law ? You mean like how Bo Xilai was so “law abiding” ? Or how Ai Weiwei is treated so “justly” ??
    Just because you are ignorant of the “scams” of China doesn’t mean everybody else is – please do some research on Chine before blindly accepting Chinese communist propaganda.

    First make Facebook and Twitter available legally in China, then tell me how “developed”, “just” and “law abiding” China is!

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Clearly, your knowledge of China is severely limited if you are going to make such ignorant statements.

    India may not be perfect but compared to a nation like China, even an Indian Dalit beggar enjoys 1000 times more rights and dignity in the eyes of the Indian government than even the richest Chinese businessman does in the eyes of China’s government.

    Not even the poorest Indian would ever agree to live in a repressive society like China no matter how much money you pay them – this is why even today Tibetans are escaping to India. And not just Tibetans, followers of Falun Dafa, artists like Ai Weiwei, even a blind man like Chen Guangcheng have tried to escape China and openly criticize their government’s repressive polices that see their people as slaves to exploit for the pride of the Communist party. At least in India, people have legitimate rights that are guaranteed by the constitution, upheld by the courts and bound to the government – in china no such things exist. The government in China can pass any law, seize anybody’s home, force people to live anywhere it wishes and arrest/detain anybody for any length of time without charge!

    To compare the two systems is simply ignorant of all the facts. India may not be perfect and may not be orderly but it is free and it is far more respectful of its citizens than the PRC ever has been!

    The best thing about India is that if you feel that something is wrong, you have the power to change it instead of simply complaining on a forum. You can campaign for change, you can stand for elections and you can enact policies that you believe are right within the bounds of the law. In China, anybody who questions the legitimacy of the Communist party is thrown in jail never to be heard from again.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Yes for the mentally challenged Communist fruitcake – India is the banana republic while the worlds largest open air prison where people are burning themselves alive because they can’t live in that hell hole is “paradise”. Tell me, do you get paid to knuckle pound such rubbish or are you just so far removed from reality that you would do this for free ?
    The only denial here is by trolls like you who are trying desperately to prove that China is “democratic” and “free” ! IF it wasn’t so ridiculous I would pity you!

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    It is always fashionable to blame Nehru for the defeat in 1962.Our Army was not well trained at all and even today it is becoming something like the US army who inspite of complete air superiority cannot tame Taliabn in Afghanistan. The Chinese soldiers do not use Bhukharies like us in cold regions.They donot expect air support because they plan for war in peace time and build continuously and train continuously .Their communication trenches can accomodate a jeep and their OPs can take a direct hit of a maortar shell while ours is built on sand bags.Our NAVY’S MARCOS COMMANDOES COULD NOT SUBDUE just 4 terrorists in 60 hours at Taj and have to call in NSG commandoes. Today what we should we discuss is how to improve the stamina and training of our troops so that they feel self confident about themselves.There were nearly 70 constables with 303 rifles in CST but could not fire single bullet at Kasab and his buddy. Why? We must think.

    [Reply]

  • fledglingBlogger

    Test

    [Reply]

  • fledglingBlogger

    I cannot understand the claim that Mr.Pilot graduated from Wharton – verity needs checking- I happened to be in a university in close promixity and had heard that he was flunking out – he probably got admitted using the ‘corporate’ quota; but getting through the competitive course wasnt trivial.

    [Reply]