BJP had no reason to tolerate Jaswant
Jaswant Singh’s expulsion from the BJP has been interpreted by many as an assault on intellectual autonomy and as a sign of Sangh Parivar intolerance. That’s missing the point completely.
The academic value of Jaswant’s interpretation of Mohammad Ali Jinnah, which is at best debatable, is not really the issue here. BJP is not a research institute or a history conference where its individual members should be encouraged to come up with new interpretations of history and society. As a political party, the BJP has arrived at certain formulations that it considers as its core beliefs. You can question the validity of these beliefs, but you cannot expect the BJP to keep in its leadership someone who questions and make mincemeat of those beliefs.
Denouncing Jinnah comes naturally to the mainstream political discourse of India, more so for the BJP. According to BJP, the self-appointed custodians of Hindu interests, Jinnah and his politics illustrated what Muslims are capable of doing. The party’s polemic often hinges on the dormant fear of a second partition or the subjugation of the majority Hindus to Muslim machinations. Suddenly, a senior leader of the party ‘discovers’ the virtues of Jinnah. There is no reason why the BJP should tolerate him.
Secondly, Jaswant Singh equated Nehru and Sardar Patel, knocking off another Sangh Parivar theory. Patel has been the only link that the Sangh has been able to draw to the national movement, tenuous as it may be. It derided Nehru and tried to appropriate Patel. According to Singh both were equally bad centralisers, who, through their intransigence conceded Pakistan to Jinnah.
Now, centralising is not a sin in BJP’s scheme of things. In the debate on federalism, BJP has always been for a stronger centre. Singh questioned that too. After all these, his friends wanted BJP to keep him as a mark of tolerance and respect for academic pursuits.
Everyone has the right to write anything. The Pope can write a book saying Jesus never lived. But the Catholic Church may then decide that it doesn’t need that particular person as Pope. It has nothing to do with tolerance.
Hindustan Times



(8 votes, average: 3.75 out of 5)

Bala Goli Reply:
May 17th, 2012 at 1:29 pm
Completely agree, this dumb writer needs help.
1. Very jealous 2. He had no clue what he was scribbling 3. Completely biased
This is the first time i visited HT site and swear never to return back. May some commonsense be bestowed upon Chethan Chauhan. Chethan You are a classic example of a bad indian.
[Reply]