Rahul Gandhi: Punished for plainspeaking
Imagine. If a politician and a foreign diplomat on a flight were to discuss terror, without anyone hearing them, and the politician does some plain-speaking in the process, is it treachery? Obviously not, unless the diplomat had other intentions.
This weekend, remarks Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi purportedly made to the US Ambassador — that radicalised Hindu groups poses a big threat — exposed him to some vilest attacks.
What went unnoticed is that, in demonising Gandhi, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came out squarely in defence of far-right Hindu extremist groups, whose violent activities have come to light. Everytime, a Muslim commits an act of terror, my head hangs in shame. On the contrary, the BJP is seen backing terrorists of one shade, rather than distancing itself from them.
I do not draw any vicarious pleasure from arrests of certain Hindus for alleged acts of terror. With every new terrorist born, we only become more unsafe. But when Muslims suspected alleged usual witch-hunting of the ‘usual suspects’, the entire community was tainted with the same brush of terror. But, as the saying goes, whatever man has done, man may do. BJP leader L K Advani pleaded with the Prime Minister for a woman Hindutva activist arrested for alleged terror links.
I have often said that the BJP’s long-term prospects hinges on their (so far missing) efforts to build capacity to represent all sections of society, not one. Hindutva may have been a short-term asset, but it is a long-term liability.
This is a nation of vast chunks of diverse ethnic, cultural and religious electorates. It’s a salad bowl, where ingredients of different shapes, sizes and colours come together to form one whole, while retaining their original flavours.
Now, let’s do some plainspeaking on what Gandhi said, to begin with? For one, he did not say that radicalized Hindu extremists were a “bigger threat” than the LeT, the Pakistani terror outfit, as is being made out to be.
There was a sweet little distortion weaved in by the RSS and the BJP. BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad used this twist and some atrocious adjectives to punish Gandhi’s plainspeaking.
Here’s the relevant portion from Ambassador Timothy Roemer’s cable, sourced to Wikileaks:
“5. (C) Responding to the Ambassador’s query about Lashkar-e-Taiba’s activities in the region and immediate threat to India, Gandhi said there was evidence of some support for the group among certain elements in India’s indigenous Muslim community. However, Gandhi warned, the bigger threat may be the growth of radicalized Hindu groups, which create religious tensions and political confrontations with the Muslim community.”
From the above paragraph, three things weighing on Gandhi’s mind are apparent. One, Gandhi looks concerned about support among certain elements of Indian Muslims for the LeT. Two, in comparison to this, growth of Hindu radical groups could be the “bigger threat” to deal with.
So, he wasn’t quite weighing the threats posed by the LeT vis-à-vis Hindu radical groups. When he said far-right Hindu extremists were a bigger threat, it was in relation to the local moles the LeT may have.
Obviously, LeT supporters in India would be minuscule compared to the expanding support base of radical Hindu outfits. So, what was so treacherous about what Gandhi said?
Overall, these two points together talk of threats India faces from extremists in both communities.
Gandhi may have suffered a moment of naivety by confiding in a foreign diplomat, who reported the conversions back to his bosses. Frankly, diplomats all over the world routinely do this. They would be failing in their duty if they did not help their establishments make sense of domestic politics in countries they are posted.
For all the brouhaha, Gandhi wasn’t whispering any secret into Roemer’s ears. Gandhi has aired his concerns over radicalism in Indian society in public before. On October 6, 2010 in Bhopal, he called both the RSS and Students Islamic Movement of India organizations with extremist ideologies.
The BJP has argued that, by highlighting the threats posed by Hindu radical groups, Gandhi has given Pakistan the upperhand. But can we afford to mete out a disproportionate response to terror? Can we, for the phantom fear of Pakistan, choose to put the lid on one source of terror, while constantly focusing on the other? A counter-terrorism that is selective is a lame horse, at best.
Muslims today are quite aware of and acknowledge the problem posed by Islamist extremism. It affects their lives in more debilitating ways.
But for those led to believe that only Muslims could be terrorists, evidence to the contrary is mounting. The RSS and its acolytes seek to eliminate our cultural and religious diversity. They seek to foist a monolithic Hindutva (literally, being Hindu) character that militates against our plurality. (If its vision and ideology is any different, I stand corrected.)
Years of promoting intolerance, majoritarianism and hatred have caused far-right Hindutva outfits to tether on the edge of terrorism. Only hypocritical politicians can choose to ignore this disturbing fact.
Hindustan Times





S Singh Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 7:34 pm
The last time I checked RSS did not train suivcide bombers and send them to other countries to create havoc.
[Reply]
Ravi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 7:52 pm
S Singh
Not sure what your point is.
RSS trains and sends Saffron terrorists to Gujarat, Pune, Orissa, etc.
They may not go abroad, but they are still a TERRORIST organization.
[Reply]
S Singh Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 8:00 pm
Well, there are terrorists,a nd then there are terrorists. If you and Zia compares a Mumbai 11/26, organized by LeT to the amateur little things RSS is alleged to have done; sorry, sir, You can go on telling… No credibility.
Indians will make decision on whether RSS is more dangerous than LeT. They will make it visible on the enxt election.
Ravi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 8:25 pm
S Singh
I am afraid I vehemently disagree with you.
Whilst I acknowledge that Mumbai was a dramatic act, but so was the riout in Gujarat which was directly orchesterated by RSS and VHP volunteers.
Further more the Dalits of India have been so oppressed (a form of terrorism) effectivley and for so long that people, including me, for a long time did not even recognise it as a form of terrorism.
Gopi Thomas Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Well, Congress party is at its usual game – appeasing Muslims,, or they think they can get Muslim votes by throwing bombs at RSS.
Digvijay has been on a campaign (about karkare talking to him two hours before his death) and then again yesterday comparing RSS with Nazis.
He and Rahul (well, he is also not known for his intelligence, having attended three colleges and not graduating from anywhere) live in yesterday’s world – the world that thought Muslims and Hindus will kill each other afterAyodhya, that people will accept G2 Spectrum issue as any other issue, that Adarsh corruption will not see the light of the day etc.. And they thought Rahul will bring Bihar to Congress. Muslims in Bihar and women in Bihar failed the Pundits by voting for Nitesh.
The electoral calculus has changed for better; Bihar and UP will not send too many congressMPS , AP will not send many congress MPs, theyw ill have to have DMK alliance,…. And hate mongering on RSS will not bring Muslims to Congress as in the past.
More about terrorism later
Ravi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 9:29 pm
Gopi
One could say, that you are at your usual tricks, denying the threat posed by RSS as a Saffron Terrorist organisation.
In the long run the Terrorism as a political strtaegy has faied every where it has been used.
It will fail for LeT (Pakistan Military) and it will fail for RSS too.
Ashish Reply:
December 20th, 2010 at 1:49 pm
@Ravi,
…and, you are upto, what? Your tricks are “un-usual”?
The Indian media is full of people like you: Barkha, Sanghvi, Rajdeep, Vinod Sharma.. we have been hearing your ad nauseam for the past many years. Were it not for guys like Prasannarajan of I Today, the sheer ludicrousness of your arguments will not find a voice in mainstream mesia.
Ravi Reply:
December 20th, 2010 at 3:07 pm
Ashish
Was there a point to this. If it was then I did not get it.
What is wrong with Barkha, Sanghvi, Rajdeep, Vinod Sharma..etc…do their views irk you.
Are they not entitled to their views.
Or the point that you are trying to make and failing to do is that you do not like Liberal Views and that you are against them.
Fine that is you right, just as it is our right to say what we think,
We think that HINDU RIGHT is a clear present danger.
I don’t know which Main Stream Media you read, but the ones that I read are mostly Liberal and are very aware of RSS’s shenanigans.
Binoy Hegde Reply:
December 20th, 2010 at 5:35 pm
Ravi–
Who are “we”? Is it the Pakistani “elite”? Muslim populace in India? Your felow Muslim radicals? Your fellow Pakistanis?
Why dont you just speak for yourself?
Ravi Reply:
December 20th, 2010 at 5:52 pm
Binoy
By we I mean Liberal Indians, rather than H I N D U F U N D O’s and S A F F R O N T E R R O R I S T S, like YOU
Ashish Reply:
December 20th, 2010 at 11:25 pm
@Ravi
First the statutory declaration:
We stopped reading HT at home when Vir Sanghvi was “outed” as the bought out hack that he is; we read Indian Express and TOI – both with varying degrees of scepticism.
Regarding Barkha “tell me what I should tell them” Dutt, who delivered and was thus mentioned in approving tones thus “Manish Tewari ka statement aa gaya, Barkha ne karwa liya”; well, what more can I say? We have stopped watching NDTV because it was bad enough that they were selling gadgets under the guise of a current affairs programme; now their political editor is dealing in minister-ships. Oh dear!
Sample Rajdeep Sardesai’s profound statement on tweeter- let there be a all party government in Kashmir; include Geelani in it- the only solution. To which I responded, great idea! Why not have a all party government in India and call Kishanji to be the PM?
I shall not bother with Vinod Sharma- he is too insignificant.
Now, let me be explicit. I do not care about labels such as liberal or secular or rightist. I abhor hypocricy. I hate the fact that these bunch of dictation takers have been calling themselves journalists while only being smart salesmen. And, it just happens to be a coincidence that all these so called journalists belong to the “liberal” camp.
Mouthing liberal dialogues makes a liberal not! Arundhati cosies up to the tribals; that is her right- but, she could do without that cosy bunglow in forest land, could she not?
Sure, it is your right to talk about anything under the sun; but, I feel we get enough of that with Manish Tiwari on TV every night.
Ravi Reply:
December 21st, 2010 at 11:18 am
Ashish.
It saddens me to read this.
I do not know any journalist who does not do CORPORATE work, doing PR, some product endorsement etc. The fact that these people compromise their integraty for paltry pecuniary gains is regrettable.
However, that does not discredit them entirely to the extent that ALL their views become suspect. Vir Sanghvi has been a Liberal all his life. He was a Liberal analyst and an Editor before he sold out to corporate interests and he is a Liberal after that. Should he suddenly start expressing ultra right wing views, then I will accept your view.
Until then I think he makes fair enough points.
The fact the career journalists are hypocrites should not come as a surprise to you and it certainly does not surprise me. I am a reader and not an un-critical fan.
The point is to attack or accept the point being made and not the author.
The above also applies to all other journos you mentioned.
S Singh Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 8:37 pm
The last time i checked Indian constitution did not allow suppression of anybody by anybody. And there are courts and processes .
If you want to be a Pakistani and Msulim sympathizer, it is your freedom in this country.
Ravi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 9:32 pm
S Singh
Last time I checked no one in India gave a flying ***** about the constitution.
Opression is SANCTIFIED in Hindu Religion.
If you want to be an appeaser of SAFFRON TERRORISM it is your right too.
S Singh Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 9:37 pm
Well, Pakistanis do not have a constitution, and even if, they do n ot care..It is the land of the Pure blessed by Allah pubh. Oh by the way, does Indias constitution have a state religion and provisions to preserve its practices
Ravi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 10:00 pm
S Singh
I dont much care what Pakistan does or not do.
I dont compare our selves with them.
I am more concerned with what we do.