India isn’t colourful the same old way



To nobody’s surprise, India is a photogenic country awash in colours — as if she were an unscathed bride idling away ages, for Kodak to invent its Eastman Color.

Along her parting hairline, the red streak of ancient vermilion is marriage hallmarked. Jaipur is sandstone pink, Jodhpur azure blue. Tea gardens make Assam leafy green, while Rajasthan is a stunning shade of sandy brown. She holds to her bosom a veritable rainbow.

Head north-east, the hills are blue. Proceed southwards, the rounded Vindhyas — the mountain range that separates northern India (the Indo-Gangetic plain) from southern India — are characteristically green.

Colours have such sacred significance in this country that the mighty Brahmaputra is called the Red River, even though it is hardly red. In every sight and every scene, India’s colours tell her timeless story.

The colours have gone beyond India’s cultures — into the rough and tumble of her politics. It is no surprise that India’s National Flag has three vibrant colours — hence the name, Tricolour. It is the symbol of our national pride. All three colours have great significance.

One of our founding fathers, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, beautifully described the significance of the colours and the blue chakra (wheel) on the National Flag in the Constituent Assembly, which collectively adopted the Tricolour.

The saffron band at the top stands for sacrifice and renunciation, the white strip in the middle for peace and purity. The green stripe at the bottom denotes prosperity, essentially agrarian abundance.

Speaking at the Constituent Assembly, Dr. Radhakrishnan said: “Bhagwa or the saffron colour denotes renunciation of disinterestedness. Our leaders must be indifferent to material gains and dedicate themselves to their work. The white in the centre is light, the path of truth to guide our conduct. The green shows our relation to soil, our relation to the plant life here on which all other life depends. The Ashoka Wheel in the centre of the white is the wheel of the law of dharma. Truth or satya, dharma or virtue ought to be the controlling principles of those who work under this flag. Again, the wheel denotes motion. There is death in stagnation. There is life in movement. India should no more resist change; it must move and go forward. The wheel represents the dynamism of a peaceful change.” Click here

According to Hindu philosophy, life is defined by three types of guna or qualities, i.e. tamas, sattva and rajas, each characterised by a different colour. White represents sattva or purity. Red stands for rajas , indicating energy. Tamas is a state of darkness, death and inertia, represented by Black.

Along the way, the colours have changed their connotation. Or is it that we have changed our colours?

From shaping India’s cultures, the colours now define her conflicts.

In the Islamic tradition, God’s favourite colour is supposedly green. That’s why the world was created predominantly green, with its forests, agriculture and plant life. Green became the thematic colour across Muslim civilizations. Therefore, almost anything related to Islam, be it mosques, Islamic art or even attire, is overwhelmingly green.

The rich green, signifying prosperity, now sometimes bobs up as an extremist shade of a few potent Muslims who kill in Islam’s name, just as there is a tint of radical Red, whose most potent form is the Maoist insurgency.

Not to be left behind, saffron, representing “renunciation of disinterestedness”, to use Dr. Radhakrishnan’s words, has long branched out into a brand of intolerant Hindu extremism.

Hemmed in by aggressive Saffrons and Greens, the White is paling. It is not for nothing that White is placed in the middle of our National Flag. It emphasizes the middle path, which is being increasingly shunned.

Today, as they did long time ago, Green, Red and Saffron still tell India’s tale. It’s a story of digression.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (12 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Mir

    “In the Islamic tradition, God’s favourite colour is supposedly green”. I wonder what reference did the author used to come to this conclusion? As per Islamic traditions, white was the favorite color of the prophet of Islam. Green color came into prominence much later with the rise of different islamic nation states, when many countries started using green in their flags etc.

    [Reply]

    Ashish Reply:

    Dear Mir,
    thanks for making the point. Perhaps Zia would clarify this. It is an interesting point how green came to be associated exclusively with Islam.
    Green should not be “owned” by Muslims anymore than saffron should be owned by Hindus.
    Similarly, I have always failed to understand why Urdu should be a Muslim-only language; should not, those who are aggressively campaigning for Urdu, simply ask that it is written in Devanagari script so that its popularity is multiplied manifold?

    [Reply]

    arindam Halder Reply:

    Well sir with all due respects No color is the exclusive domain of any religion or sect its us humans who have made them symbols.Urdu for instance was never meant to be a language to be spoken by only muslims but its only our stance that prevents us from learning urdu otherwise how would you explain many poets of the yore who wrote in hindi were also had mastery over urdu. for example Harivansh Rai bachan was well versed in urdu.And tell me how many people actually study sanskrit inspite of being in devnagiri and not restricted?Is it popular?
    And Mr Sami you are very much correct in saying that we may be different but there are multiple reasons which make us Indians.And yes India is colourful and vibrant because of people like you ,me and all of us,

    And seriously I had no idea about the colours stuff but the comments on this blog are just very good.But the comments also tell me one thing…That our forefathers and our ancestors were were way ahead of us when it came to thinking and somewhere down the line we have narrowed down that visionin terms of caste creed,religion and colour.

    [Reply]

  • raman

    Is it true that now-a-days that it is being taught that saffron is for Hindu, green is for Muslims and white is for Christians? (what abt other religion?)

    [Reply]

    raman Reply:

    If yes, then that’s horrible……

    [Reply]

  • Sami

    Zia Haq is certainly the one with less subjective knowledge and more general knowledge, how else he would say that the green is the colour of ISLAMIC ATTIRE….how much green do you see in Makkah or in any other mosques? It’s the white, darling… Zia don’t write to please, you won’t go a long way. Write what it is, true, fearless and unbiased. Did Islam tell you to stay away from saffron? No. India is all colourful and vibrant thanks to its people, most of whom believe in sharing the hues of cultures and not because of people like you who make embarrassing, sheepish and cowardly excuses to supposedly put up a hollow defense without success. We are different in a way, but united in more ways.

    [Reply]

  • vijay kumar

    This is the sensible side of Zia which has written this blog now…

    Wonder what happens to him when he deals with the supposed discrimintion of Muslims worldwide.

    To extend the metaphor further, the world consists of people of so many races and colors and religions. And everybody has the right to exist as equal, without trying to convert or kill people who do not belong to your sect.

    As for green being the color of Islam, it is of course used in many a Muslim monument. So it is also in many a temple… or for that matter even in the BJP flag! As much as in the indian flag!

    Hindus should have no monoply over saffron. Neither should green be said to be the color of Muslims only.

    In fact I think, green became a favourite with mosques as so many are located in desert areas and green in dry deserts does look pristine and soothing.

    As an architect I liberally use green in my buildings…:) :) :)

    [Reply]

    Ashish Reply:

    @Vijay Kumar,
    Just launched my new company website and the entire website is a play in dark and light green and some gray!

    [Reply]

    sanjeev Reply:

    This is the most ridiculous explaination by any journalist..

    In fact the colours, rituals rites etc of each religion evolved in a particlur geographical settings..in which that religion originated..

    Since islam evolved in deserts that why they have fascination for greenery…..

    similary the cremation etc prevalent in india coz..there were plenty of forests initially in the indo-gangetic plains where hinduism and other indian traditions originated..

    I can give you one example of hindu community..called Bishnoi’s of Rajasthan and haryana region…who mostly inhabited desert of Thar…they bury the dead

    This was an adaption of communites to cope up with natural environment..

    Remember salman khan black buck shooting case…it was lodged by bishnoi’s…as there are plenty of black bucks protected by them in their villages (without the region declared as any wildlife sanctuary offically )

    Plus cutting the green trees and killing of animals is biggest sin in their sect..

    So Zia instead of giving your silly explaination of God and all that……… look into the historical- geographical environment of the region where the religion originated…

    Similary we can give explaination for heaven also..

    .Indian concepts of heaven is found in only one school of thought…JAIMINI’s mimamsa… There are six schools of hinduism (most popular were sankaracharya’s vedanta,

    Ramanuj vedanta, Samkhya, Patanjali- yoga, Nyaya- vaisesika are other schools of hinduism which doesn’t have any heaven’s concept.

    But all have rebirth and Moksa
    Budhism Jainism, sikhism doesn’t have heaven….

    It describes heaven as place having rivers full of honey and milk…there is no suffering etc.. there are cool winds blowing in there..

    We can expect this to be wish of every man in a tropical climatic region.

    Semitic religion (judeo-christian-islam) they have materialistic concept of Heaven….

    Islam have highly physical conception of heaven..a take from google

    Heaven is described primarily in physical terms as a place where every wish is immediately fulfilled. Islamic texts describe immortal life in heaven as happy, without negative emotions. Those who dwell in heaven are said to wear costly apparel, partake in exquisite banquets, and recline on couches inlaid with gold or precious stones. Inhabitants will rejoice in the company of their parents, wives, and children. Texts also refer to “pure consorts” (houris), with whom sexual relations are said to be “a hundred times greater than earthly pleasure”.

    The parable of the Garden which the righteous are promised! Beneath it flow rivers. Perpetual is the fruits thereof and the shade therein. Such is the End of the Righteous; and the end of the unbelievers is the Fire.

    (source: wikipaedia )

    We can easily understand that desert people can hardly fullfil their basic needs of life and hence…they all wish to have physical wants satisfied…

    See claerly the desert ehtos are reflected in this descritpion in quran..

    link

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven#In_Hinduism

    Those 72 things can be understood in this context

    [Reply]

  • sanjeev

    @ Zia

    Please don’t put half baked lies in front of innocent people..

    “According to Hindu philosophy, life is defined by three types of guna or qualities, i.e. tamas, sattva and rajas, each characterised by a different colour. White represents sattva or purity. Red stands for rajas , indicating energy. Tamas is a state of darkness, death and inertia, represented by Black. ”

    This is utterly wrong to say hindu philosophy…this is one of the many schools of hindu or indian philosophy..

    When this philosophy was given there was no term “hindu” as such…this term came into use only after your arabic marauders attacked this beautifull country…

    The term hindu came into being

    This thing you have mentioned is from Samkhya philosopy by Kapil Muni..

    Samkhya is an atheistic school…They beleive that the world evolved out of two ultimate realities…Prakrti and Purusa.

    Prakrti is material wheras purusa is consciousness or spirit or atman (soul )

    Sattva, rajas, tamas are constituent elements of prakarti…they are not gunas (qualities) in the ordinary sense of the term

    The colours used are in a sense metaphors …sattva is illuminating…just like a lamp lights up in darkness

    Similarly…if the prakrti have predominace of tamas then there is suffering, pain etc ..so for that black has been used as metaphor…bcoz tradionally black is used for sadness

    similary…rajas is responsible for restlessness or activity or provide energy…for this metaphor is used..that rajas is of the nature of red

    [Reply]

    mashiat Reply:

    dear mr. sanjeev..
    i recently started reading ZIA’s blog and found out that you are a regular reader plus commentator of this blog..and after reading this comment of your’s..i also got to know that you have much knowledge of your religion…HINDU right….

    i just wanted to add smthng…what you call yourself ” a hindu” is not because you worship idols…but because you live in a area which anciently was called HIND…so all the residents of india are HINDU….and thid name was given by invaders of india….n then came the indian mythology..which actually is a hindu mythology becoz we are ppl of hind….and so the ppl of india were called hindu because they all were following the same religion….but the invaders came up with there religion also..and then the division according to the religion came into existence…..

    [Reply]

    sanjeev Reply:

    @ mashiat

    i agree fully

    I thought this fact is known to most people

    Since persians can’t pronounce the word SIND ….as their language doesn’t have appropriate sound for “s” hence they used to call it “HIND”

    Btw…i m more of irreligious but i know philosophical aspects of all religions..

    i have read basic books on religious philosopical

    but i don’t know very much ritualistic aspects of any religion…

    Logically budhism is most sound religion of all

    [Reply]

    sanjeev Reply:

    @ mashiat

    “i have read basic books on religious philosopical ”

    to be read….religious philosophy..

    sorry for typing error

  • sanjeev

    @ mashiat

    The most popular school of indian philosophy (that of sankaracharya) he has strictly rejected need fro any devotion and worship for attaining the highest goal of human life…moksha (liberation from the cycle of birth and death ). He advocated jnan marga for attaining moksha.

    But other like Ramanuja ( another very famous school of thought) advocated bhakti..worship etc..

    Hindus consider sankaracharya as greatest interpreter of upanisadas but follow many things as taught by Ramanuja also..

    Similary there are others like Charvaka, Kapil Muni, Mimaska’s who were atheistic..

    So they have attacked any form of worship also..

    You can’t make nay generalizations about who a hindu is…

    Yes the common things among them are:
    1. Law of karma
    2. Theory of rebirth
    3. Moksha as highest end of human life..

    So idol worship is not any defining feature of hindus

    [Reply]

    Rajeev Reply:

    Sanjeev,
    I simply do not (want) to understand religious mumbo-jumbo.
    As far as I am concerned, my religion is my conscience. I’ll be very dis-appointed with Hinduism if hindus become too religious and waste time on non-productive religious mumbo-jumbo like muslims and christians.

    I love freedom of Hinduism..It allows me to think and beleive I want to.

    [Reply]

  • sanjeev

    @ Rajeev

    But i think one should be aware of the philosphical theories advocated by major religions ..

    It helps one evaluate all faiths better..

    Btw i am also of your kind…:)

    [Reply]

    Rajeev Reply:

    What philosphy?
    The only philosophy is to live ethical life where you don’t feel ashamed of yourself.
    I am not a big fan of ‘RELIGIOUS’ stuff but have great affinity for civillizational values.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.rediff.com Paritosh

    @ Mashiat

    you are just another sh*t speaking Muslim on this blog. in the ancient times India was called as Bharat Varsh and not Hind. the name Hind comes from the Persian language , and this word has Arabic origin (al-Hind). this word came to the scene in the early middle ages. please get your facts right before speaking some bull sh*t

    [Reply]

  • Gopi Thomas

    We just came back from a tour to Southern kerala (Kumarakom etc). The abundant green, the golden yellow of “Vishu Konna flowers”, towering temples, churches, and of course green mosques were all on full display throughout the hundreds of miles we traversed.

    However, behind all these, the green menace was looming large in people’s conversations; including Muslms’. Many new extreme Muslim political parties are formed in kerala in the last two years ; all with “democratic” prefixes in the ir names – Socialist democratic peoples party, National Democratic Front, Peoples Democratic Party- to name a few. These are all ex SImi in different covers. Kerala does not have a BJP to speak off, no single assembly seat. With the arrest of many Muslim youths for participating in terror training in Pakistan; many have deep worries about the intent of these youths. They are worried the dominant color will be red (not the CPM’s red)

    [Reply]

  • JP

    Why subscribe color to religion.

    [Reply]

  • Aarushi

    ‘India isn’t colourful the same old way’…this statement seems to be flowing out of colourblindness. India is increasingly adding on to hues and tints to its palette. Lets have a pragmatic approach and acknowledge the shades between ’saffron’ and ‘green’ as well.

    [Reply]

    auma Reply:

    till 60 back , india was a like a band of discrete colours. But now india is becoming more or less like a “spectrum” of colours ! This is due to mixing !

    [Reply]

  • sanjay

    who so ever will be the PM he must have a quality of narendra modi– a best administrator in country

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    everything depends on up elections in 2012. if the bjp can put up a decent show then they have hopes of even going it alone in 2014 –in that case modi can become the prime minister easily .
    it all depends at the situation in 2012 or after that . We know the politicians –they will gravitate to a partY or person who has chances to come to power
    another thing which is important is the stress we are giving to muslim vote –this should be marginalised .
    Political pundits are wrong in their assesment as they see the coming to power of upa 1 as the reaction of the aam admi to the bjp rule —frankly bjp rule was not bad , better than the congress but there was one difference which perhaps cost them the election POLITICAL. PUNDITS MAY HAVE THEIR OWN FANCY THEORIES BUT MY FATHER 1 YEAR BEFORE THE BJP LOSS HAD PREDICTED THIS LOSS–THE REASON , AS HE SAID THT THEY SHOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING DIFFERENT FOR THE HINDUS WHICH ALL WHO VOTED FOR THEM EXPECTED . AS HE SAID THEY DID NOTHING FOR THE HINDU CONSTITUENCY AS PEOPLE EXPECTED—– THE ENTHUSIASM OF THE HINDUS WHO VOTED FOR THEM WANED AS HE HAD PREDICTED . THE VOTE BANK OF BJP IS NOT MUSLIM BUT HINDUS –THEY SHOULD NURTURE THIS IF THEY WANT TO WIN . aFTER ALL 85 PERCENT IS DEFINETLY MORE THAN 15 PERCENT—-SOLIDFY , UNITE THIS VOTE BANK

    [Reply]

  • mohd anaskhan

    Million Dollar question is that when Modi has failed to manage 6 Cr Gujarati How he will manage 120 Cr Indians.

    [Reply]

    vinod Reply:

    Million pound answer is he is not their to manage the people , he is there for serving the 6 crore gujrati , & for your information he has taken the clear & clean steps which is followe by the people working in the state government & same will happened while ruling india as P.M

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Rajiv Gandhi failed to manage 5 million Delhites so how did he manage 800 million people in 1984?
    I know muslims are communal 99% of the time but it looks like you are communal 100% of the time.

    [Reply]

    Gaurang Vaishanv Reply:

    Congress “manages”, nay, manipulates people, mostly Muslims whom it has kept poor and uneducated for six decades. Modi does not manage, he inspires and enthuses. Results are for all to see there, if they have eyes to see.

    [Reply]

  • Ananthanarayan Na

    It’s a foolish write up and justify that muslims will vote for congress, as Narendra Modi is getting projected as PM , but of late muslims have also realised that sitting with congress for these many years has done no good and congress is considered as STUS QUO party.

    [Reply]

  • Famouspankaj

    it shall be blessing of God that modi shall become prime mnister of india -pankaj

    [Reply]

  • Mehta Snajay22

    NarinderJi is a fantastic personality. The man is full of moral character, ethics and having the spontaneous caliber to adminstrate and lead not only Gujrat, but India and its my conviction that India would be the Pioneer in world under his Premiership. I wish long life to NarinderJi as well as to attain his goal to lead the country for the well being of country.

    [Reply]

  • anirudh

    Before debating over the issue, think – who is there to compete with Modi – Rahul Ganghi?
    Wont it be a contest between ability and inability?
    The fact that Modi is the most able administrator and Rahul Ganghi is unable to do anything right, is not a secret. (So far only the Indians knew about it, now even the Americans do). In spite of this if Rahul Gandhi becomes the PM, wont it raise questions on the intelligence of the Indian voter?
    Shouldnt there be a reasonable criterion for the top job? The developmental work of Modi is for all to see (those who can not, should consult an eye specialist). But think – what can Rahul claim about, what did he do to deserve the post?
    Please think reasonably.

    [Reply]

  • Gaurang Vaishanv

    What you are suggesting is typical Congress theory of appeasement of minorities. Modi has done noting wrong, no court has charge-sheeted him nine years after riots that were in reaction to burning alive 59 innocent Hindus by Muslims. He does not owe anything special to the Muslims and will not do what you are asking.

    [Reply]

  • Gaurang Vaishanv

    How do you know that he has not won hearts of others? May be you need to take off those colored, prejudiced glasses and study media reports all over.

    [Reply]

    JSW Reply:

    Media bik chuki hai, Porngress ke hatho me.

    [Reply]

  • Gaurang Vaishanv

    By any chance are you related to Shaktising Gohil or Arjun Modhwadia? If not, you should apply as their spokesperson. They have been weaving the same fantastic yarn for 10 years but without any success. So either people of Guajrat are stupid idiots who cannot see through Modi’s lies or you are a frustrated Congressi.

    [Reply]

  • JSW

    are you idiot, I think you dont love india, that is why you hate modi, please support him to grow india, but if you will not support him, other people will, and he will become PM, please allow india to grow.

    [Reply]

  • JSW

    are you idiot, I think you dont love india, that is why you hate modi, please support him to grow india, but if you will not support him, other people will, and he will become PM, please allow india to grow.

    [Reply]