<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sailing in the same boat, with a difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/</link>
	<description>HT Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yashwanth Dhakshana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-80136</link>
		<dc:creator>Yashwanth Dhakshana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-80136</guid>
		<description>the &quot;wishful thinking&quot; is from educated scholars and thinkers though. wouldn&#039;t their thoughts, which are based on math models, be more valid then yours, which is clearly based off pessimism? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the &#8220;wishful thinking&#8221; is from educated scholars and thinkers though. wouldn&#8217;t their thoughts, which are based on math models, be more valid then yours, which is clearly based off pessimism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Kurian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-79831</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Kurian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 07:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-79831</guid>
		<description>Is it in the interests of the common man, the citizens of Nepal, that the ones in power, debating in Kathmandu, cannot agree to form a constitution for 6 years?!?! 
People are around who suffer with no power or even the basic feature of a decent road to a hospital; inflation is at a high...the list can go on! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it in the interests of the common man, the citizens of Nepal, that the ones in power, debating in Kathmandu, cannot agree to form a constitution for 6 years?!?!<br />
People are around who suffer with no power or even the basic feature of a decent road to a hospital; inflation is at a high&#8230;the list can go on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirgha Raj Prasai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-79824</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirgha Raj Prasai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-79824</guid>
		<description>Respected Editor and Readers !
Good Morning from Kathmandu !
Yes !I think- there are so many problems that there
will be no the consensus to complete the peace process and the writing of a
constitution among the parties. Another major sticking point is how to
integrate thousands of Maoist fighters housed in camps since the nation&#039;s civil
war ended in 2006. A proposal to integrate them into the Nepal Army will be
failed because Nepal&#039;s
Army officers do not want integration of such Maoist&#039;s -ism trained
workers. Dr. Baburam Bhattarai, known as a so-called qualified and confused writer
seems extremely controversial.
Nowhere in the world,
would a country be able to protect its sovereignty by making the national army
weak and powerless? The national army can&#039;t compare with Maoist&#039;s army. Now, in
Nepal,
we have two kinds of army- the national army and the Maoist&#039;s army. Can we
imagine two kinds of army in a country?  



The creator of the Maoist rebellion was Girija.
After 1992, in the name of annihilating Masal-Communists (later called the
Maoists) murder, suppression, and rape crossed the limit. In revenge, Maoists
systematically killed thousands of civilians, police and army personnel.
Millions worth of physical infrastructures were destroyed or burned. And since
2005, Girija (leader of NC) joined hands with the Maoists. JNU Prof -S.D.Muni,
the strategist of RAW had given the 12-point anti-Nepal agendas of the
Republic, Secularism and Federal states to the perverted leaders of the parties
and a few lawyers, doctors, and journalists to end the existence of Nepal.


The Maoists are using their agendas and are
opening a &#039;Pandora&#039;s Box&#039;- a one-party communist anarchism. The Maoist Party
has own army. It is a big conspirator that the Maoist fighters(Co-called army) almost have joined with the New Mohan Baidha Maoist&#039;s party and Baburam Bhattarai. There are may be only 6-8 hundreds fighter can join in Nepal army. It may be to disturb Nepal army&#039;s secrecy. So, it is not believable that the Maoists are supporting the democratic peaceful  sense.
I am sorry to write that it was a great blunder
of Indian diplomats- Shyam Saran- former Indian ambassador and former foreign
Secretary of India (who is widely credited with bringing the present
instability in Nepal), and Sive Shankar Mukharejee, former foreign minister, KB
Rajan- former Indian ambassador Rakesh Sood- former ambassador, Prof.SD Muni
(RAW strategist) and other officials who not only blundered in their assessment
of the Maoists but also did much harm to Indian&#039;s interests in Nepal. Among diplomats,
Shyam Saran is a very ambitious diplomat who could not calculate the good
result. 



Due to the Indian diplomats&#039; mistakes and the result became bad for India also. Now all the agendas of Democratic System are in risk. The intention of Maoist is to
create one party communist regime. The Maoist never supports constitutional
democratic system in Nepal
including India.  Then, we should find the solution to save Nepal-
constitutionally. The 1990 Constitution was not abolished in a appropriate constitutional
manner. The 1990 Constitution should implement with monarchy to provide a
momentum for the nation. This is the point of solution. Nor China comes
with Communism for its security. We must remain alert from foreign conspiracy
and suicidal activities of despicable leaders. It is high time we sacrifice in
name of country by joining shoulder to shoulder with the national army,
security organs and patriotic Nepali people with the King. It is the compulsion of Nepal and India.   

Thank you.
Dirgha Raj Prasai



    Email:
dirgharajprasai@gmail.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respected Editor and Readers !<br />
Good Morning from Kathmandu !<br />
Yes !I think- there are so many problems that there<br />
will be no the consensus to complete the peace process and the writing of a<br />
constitution among the parties. Another major sticking point is how to<br />
integrate thousands of Maoist fighters housed in camps since the nation&#8217;s civil<br />
war ended in 2006. A proposal to integrate them into the Nepal Army will be<br />
failed because Nepal&#8217;s<br />
Army officers do not want integration of such Maoist&#8217;s -ism trained<br />
workers. Dr. Baburam Bhattarai, known as a so-called qualified and confused writer<br />
seems extremely controversial.<br />
Nowhere in the world,<br />
would a country be able to protect its sovereignty by making the national army<br />
weak and powerless? The national army can&#8217;t compare with Maoist&#8217;s army. Now, in<br />
Nepal,<br />
we have two kinds of army- the national army and the Maoist&#8217;s army. Can we<br />
imagine two kinds of army in a country?  </p>
<p>The creator of the Maoist rebellion was Girija.<br />
After 1992, in the name of annihilating Masal-Communists (later called the<br />
Maoists) murder, suppression, and rape crossed the limit. In revenge, Maoists<br />
systematically killed thousands of civilians, police and army personnel.<br />
Millions worth of physical infrastructures were destroyed or burned. And since<br />
2005, Girija (leader of NC) joined hands with the Maoists. JNU Prof -S.D.Muni,<br />
the strategist of RAW had given the 12-point anti-Nepal agendas of the<br />
Republic, Secularism and Federal states to the perverted leaders of the parties<br />
and a few lawyers, doctors, and journalists to end the existence of Nepal.</p>
<p>The Maoists are using their agendas and are<br />
opening a &#8216;Pandora&#8217;s Box&#8217;- a one-party communist anarchism. The Maoist Party<br />
has own army. It is a big conspirator that the Maoist fighters(Co-called army) almost have joined with the New Mohan Baidha Maoist&#8217;s party and Baburam Bhattarai. There are may be only 6-8 hundreds fighter can join in Nepal army. It may be to disturb Nepal army&#8217;s secrecy. So, it is not believable that the Maoists are supporting the democratic peaceful  sense.<br />
I am sorry to write that it was a great blunder<br />
of Indian diplomats- Shyam Saran- former Indian ambassador and former foreign<br />
Secretary of India (who is widely credited with bringing the present<br />
instability in Nepal), and Sive Shankar Mukharejee, former foreign minister, KB<br />
Rajan- former Indian ambassador Rakesh Sood- former ambassador, Prof.SD Muni<br />
(RAW strategist) and other officials who not only blundered in their assessment<br />
of the Maoists but also did much harm to Indian&#8217;s interests in Nepal. Among diplomats,<br />
Shyam Saran is a very ambitious diplomat who could not calculate the good<br />
result. </p>
<p>Due to the Indian diplomats&#8217; mistakes and the result became bad for India also. Now all the agendas of Democratic System are in risk. The intention of Maoist is to<br />
create one party communist regime. The Maoist never supports constitutional<br />
democratic system in Nepal<br />
including India.  Then, we should find the solution to save Nepal-<br />
constitutionally. The 1990 Constitution was not abolished in a appropriate constitutional<br />
manner. The 1990 Constitution should implement with monarchy to provide a<br />
momentum for the nation. This is the point of solution. Nor China comes<br />
with Communism for its security. We must remain alert from foreign conspiracy<br />
and suicidal activities of despicable leaders. It is high time we sacrifice in<br />
name of country by joining shoulder to shoulder with the national army,<br />
security organs and patriotic Nepali people with the King. It is the compulsion of Nepal and India.   </p>
<p>Thank you.<br />
Dirgha Raj Prasai</p>
<p>    Email:<br />
<a href="mailto:dirgharajprasai@gmail.com">dirgharajprasai@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebarchnaPalDREAMS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-37613</link>
		<dc:creator>DebarchnaPalDREAMS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-37613</guid>
		<description>suzanne?attractive??she looks so bad and she is so besharam and ill-mannered.hrithik is so unlucky for marrying to a an unwanted escort like her.after watching them together in kwk 3, i can understand how much she &#039;s disperate n why hrithik has so many affairs. stop desrespecting a great person like hrithik .he is the ony man who takes his wife&#039;s name even though she&#039;s a loser n nothing without him.then what should u say about srgay who flirts with women even in front of his gorgeous wife,life GAURI KHAN. she actually deserves all love n respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>suzanne?attractive??she looks so bad and she is so besharam and ill-mannered.hrithik is so unlucky for marrying to a an unwanted escort like her.after watching them together in kwk 3, i can understand how much she &#8217;s disperate n why hrithik has so many affairs. stop desrespecting a great person like hrithik .he is the ony man who takes his wife&#8217;s name even though she&#8217;s a loser n nothing without him.then what should u say about srgay who flirts with women even in front of his gorgeous wife,life GAURI KHAN. she actually deserves all love n respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marine construction</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-9688</link>
		<dc:creator>marine construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-9688</guid>
		<description>While we are discussing about topics relevant to   Sailing in the same boat, with a difference : Singly Political, Docks in general come in two configurations. The very first kind of dock is a very simple long and thin section that makes it effortless for a individual to get on and off a boat. Other types of docks contain two parts. The very first is really a long and thin section and the second component is a wider dock section normally after the thin section for a place to lounge out on. Whatever your option, figure how far out you will need to go from land to access your boat. Take into consideration the depth of water from land as well as the size of your boat. For instance, a row boat will only will need a couple of feet of water; where as a 22 footer will must be docked in a considerable depth of water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we are discussing about topics relevant to   Sailing in the same boat, with a difference : Singly Political, Docks in general come in two configurations. The very first kind of dock is a very simple long and thin section that makes it effortless for a individual to get on and off a boat. Other types of docks contain two parts. The very first is really a long and thin section and the second component is a wider dock section normally after the thin section for a place to lounge out on. Whatever your option, figure how far out you will need to go from land to access your boat. Take into consideration the depth of water from land as well as the size of your boat. For instance, a row boat will only will need a couple of feet of water; where as a 22 footer will must be docked in a considerable depth of water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leena Mucerino</title>
		<link>http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/2010/08/06/sailing-in-the-same-boat-with-a-difference/comment-page-1/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>Leena Mucerino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.hindustantimes.com/singly-political/?p=237#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>Anyone who does a lot of sustained physical labor needs to have a lot of fat in their diet to supply an adequate amount of energy. They will help you lose weight fast and they are applicable for long term weight loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who does a lot of sustained physical labor needs to have a lot of fat in their diet to supply an adequate amount of energy. They will help you lose weight fast and they are applicable for long term weight loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
