It’s the money that counts



Mandy was my best friend in Paris. We ate together, shopped together, travelled together. We went on assignments to the same European country at the same time so that we could later team up and paint the town red together. And I defended her fiercely against misplaced racist attacks from some stuck-up Brits on our multi-racial course in mid-career journalism in Paris in the early Nineties.

She did, too – she, too, defended me against racist attacks from a section of Parisians. There was this shopkeeper once who refused to sell me a book. I could see the book in the display but the woman kept insisting she did not have it on stock. Mandy made sure notes, on huge sheets of paper, were posted all over the street leading from the bookstore to our institute, clearly stating what had happened and exhorting all students never to buy from that store. I noticed that shop shut down for quite sometime after that though I am still not sure if it was the after-effects of Mandy’s campaign or just a coincidence. But they did not open their shutters for months later.

Then, again, at a street sale (much like our Fashion Street in Bombay), another Parisian refused to allow me to look at the clothes. Every garment that I would touch, she would snatch from my hands and say, “It will get soiled.”

Mandy, who was with me and watching this with one eye on me and the other on her own shopping, suddenly lost her cool. She then slid all the hangers off the rack and tumbled the clothes on to the ground (this was on a street, not even inside a shop with clean floors). “Now they are all soiled!” she told the non-plussed saleswoman. “Make sure you get them all cleaned.” She pulled my arm and stalked off with me to another store which was not racist and allowed me to shop happily alongside her.

It was but natural then that I should come her defence when one particular British citizen on the course took potshots off Mandy. When I offered an invitation to her to stay with me if and when she came visiting India, Jane said, “Be warned — you will find your refrigerator emptied out of everything when you return each evening and you will have to stock up every day for she will eat you out of home and hearth. These guys always do.”

Mandy looked hurt but could hardly say anything. For Jane was White. And Mandy was White, too. But Mandy was/is Australian. Jane couldn’t stand her and was very subtle in her racist attacks on Mandy. But when she said that thing about eating away to glory about Mandy, I just couldn’t resist telling a story out of Reader’s Digest to them both.

The story was about a British woman whose son migrates to Australia but his mother refuses to go along because as she puts it, “All the criminals went there. So, certainly not!”

Jane looked delighted and Mandy even more hurt when I started that story.

“Wait,” I told them, “I haven’t finished. There’s more.”

Years later, I continued, when the man marries an Australian and has two or three children by then, his mother comes out to visit her son and his family. She gets attached to her daughter-in-law and invites her to visit Britain some time or the other. The young woman promptly replies, “Certainly not! That’s where all the criminals came from!”

It was now Mandy’s turn to be delighted and Jane looked as though she could murder me. But then I was brown-skinned/coloured; so she had to hold her tongue. But if her looks could have killed, I would sure be a dead Indian by now.

However, it was not as though my relationship/friendship with Mandy was completely untroubled. Even though I could not articulate it then, I could sense the nuanced character with which that relationship was carried on. Read this link

It was a year-long course. At the end of it I do not think Mandy was my best friend at all. For, by then I had banded together (and bonded) with the other Asians on the course.

Still, I told Mandy I would attend her wedding in Australia. “Oh, yes. You will be the closest, compared to the others from Africa and Europe.” she said. “But can you afford it?”

Actually, I would have gone even if I had to pinch pennies and kill myself for it. But that comment (or rather the condescension behind it) hurt. I never did go to her wedding, then.

And in view of what Sharad Pawar told me (read the link) about Australians and their feelings about Indian affluence, I am not surprised at the continuing racist attacks on Indians in Australia and the combined denial of the charges of racism by all Australian authorities.

Pawar was right: they want our money but they hate us for it. And what is now getting even more dangerous is that they can also kill us for it!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://incorrectpolitically.wordpress.com Akhilesh

    Sujata,
    For once and after a long, long time, I am in total agreement with you. Self procalimed liberals have this incomprehensible trait of always trying to understand the other points of view while snubbing down one’s own. So over the past few weeks, we have heard and read various apologists trying to defend Australia. That how it is all some street crime – that how India has more street crime than Australia – that we have caste system too, so what if some of us get killed there and so on !

    Some other liberals have this tendency to find the middle ground. They presume that this makes them come across as reasoned and mature. So they will try and find middle ground between Australian racism and Indian protest – by saying things like Australia needs to get its act together while India needs to eliminate caste from soceity !!

    Give them a chance and they would even try an find out middle ground between Kasab and Tukaram Omble !!

    So it was great relief to see you taking a clear cut unambiguous position. And for once, I agree with your quote from your favourite Pawar too !

    Ponting, the worst behaved Australian cricketer in last twenty years, judged by Australian themselves, and clearly a villian in the Bhajji episode, ultimatley choose an Indian company to act as brand sponsor – why – because that company pays him the more than any Australian company could !! ( And incidentally I work in this company !!)

    Kudos to you for calling a spade a spade !

    Wish you continue on this trait when commenting on BJP and its policies. Now more so since your village buddy Nitin Gadkari is BJP President :)

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Hey, Akhilesh, Nagpur is not a village, it is the fastest-growing town in India and even bucked the recession trend last year and posted huge profits in every sector. Still, I somehow lke the term “village buddy” and village buddies we, clearly, are!

    Moreover, I always call a spade a spade — only, sometimes you do not quite see eye to eye because those times the spade is saffron!

    [Reply]

  • http://joezachs.blogspot.com/ Joe Zachs

    Let us face it.
    Once you decide to settle/stay anywhere outside your own country, you are a second class citizen there. There is no doubt about it.

    [Reply]

    Akhilesh Reply:

    Hahahah. Touche !
    It is really amazing how most of us take offence when something is said against our home city. “Nagpur is the fastest growing town in India” ? Thats news !

    When I had used “village buddy”, I had actually meant to use it as term to denote the friendship between you two. I remembered reading somewhere, possibly one of your own blogs, that you two get along well. Thus the term “village buddy”.

    You always call a spade a spade – let’s see – could we see a blog from you on how Sharad Pawar has totally screwed up ( forgive me, I could not come up with a parliamentary word for what he has done) the agriculture ministry. And how he is totally culpabale in the spiralling prices that ordinary Indians are bearing.

    Could you call this spade a spade too !!

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    For that, Akhilesh, log on to the Mumbai edition of Hindustan Times on Wednesday and please read my column on the edit page

    [Reply]

    Akhilesh Reply:

    Sujata,
    Read your “Anandan on Wednesday” piece in Mumbai HT edition – where you said you will call the Pawar spade a spade !!

    And how do I feel after reading that article – disgusted. It is the only feeling I have. Many respondents have berated you in the past on your soft corner for Pawar, including me. Some have used intemperate language. Even I have been acerbic at times, but then I had decided to be more civil. However, this article in HT has simply left me dumbfounded.

    You say that you believe Pawar when he says sugar prices will fall in a week – what was he doing before that? Sleeping? Have you asked him this question when he had the audacity to make such a promise. Even otherwise , it is a week now since he made this promise and sugar prices are yet to fall – infact they have risen further. Yet you repeat is obnoxious promise as gosepl !!!

    In the UPA – II regime every minister has been making almost monthly announcements regarding new policies of his ministry. Have you herd Pawar speak even once these past 9 months? Even once.

    Yet how do you treat him – that the monsoon and sugar have failed him?? These have failed him or has Pawar failed India. And failed criminally.

    Your argument was like like saying Gandhi was such a God but present day politicians fail his ideals. Pawar the god – the best India could hope to get – yet we are not good enough to deserve him – we fail him !!

    It is no shame to openly become a chamcha of a politician or a party. However, it is disingenious to pretend neutrality and then behave as the most unabashed chamcha.

    I am dissapointed that I had hoped it to be different.

    PS: Inspite of trying to control myself, my language may have become harsh. Please forgive for the language – but not the sentiment !

    Rajeev Reply:

    There was a story in outlook about how some journalists sleep with politicians to get goodies.

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Have you ever heard of the understatement and veiled sarcasm, Akhilesh? How can I help it if you miss the nuances? Still, those who understand know exactly what I am saying.

  • http://- Rajeev

    Sujata,
    I am yet to read any critical piece about Sonia-Mata and Rahul baba from you.
    Now don’t tell me these maa-beta are above critcism.

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    I am a Bombay journalist with no interaction at all with either mother or son. Please look to Delhi journalists who meet them often for insights on them.

    [Reply]

    Rajeev Reply:

    You don’t have to meet Maa-Beta to write critical piece on their policies.
    You are just making an excuse. I guess Vir Sanghvi doesn’t allow anything critical to Maa-Beta-Beti in HT papers.

    [Reply]

  • Malvika

    Hi Sujata!

    It is an excellent article and let’s face it,Joe Zacks above is right. You are treated as a second rate citizen in every other country.

    I can also tell you that yes, the locals are often jealous of the Indians mainly due to their affluence, intelligence or hard work. I have been at the receiving end of the jealousy stemmed hatred at a Walmart check out counter. The cashier ( a local college boy) told me that Indians have no life and all they ever did was study and study some more.

    We as a people need to wake up and ‘call a spade a spade’ telling the world, we are not the ones to be trampled over.

    [Reply]

  • http://canadianEssence.net/phpBB2/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=65640 Dana Cozzy

    We all will have certain foods that don’t agree with us or our body type. Not everyone gets the psychological support they need nor do they get the guidance of what to expect once they lose the weight.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/dushyant.panda Dushyant Panda

    Sir, I believe that the primary reason is the behaviour of the anchors themselves. I mean forget the news, they all believe that the evening news should be as intense as Devil’s Advocate!!

    [Reply]

  • 212

    Hi Mr Expat I don’t know about others however I for one support your thought of abolishing the 6 day working week in India.However that may be easier said then done as the current United Pricks Alliance or the current UPA government of India is run by the corporate sector and are only dummy representatives of people of a banana republic.

    [Reply]

  • Raw Indian

    Coz people think – work is worship…which is WRONG!!!!!!!!!

    [Reply]

  • rahul tendi

    bestuuuuuuuuuuuuuu bestuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu poda tendi … ninde aur bestuuuuuuuuuuuu bestuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu ….. working in Mumbai and being smart , do u even have the courage to work in Kerala … phaaa chutiaa saala

    [Reply]

    Clark44 Reply:

    Has somebody told you that you are a ******????? I doubt, truth is always tasteless.

    [Reply]

  • anand

    Do you know that India govt has a policy to drive the employees mad by making it mandatory for all indian railway operating staff who ensures the safe passage of trains throughout india to work 60+3. 48+3. 42+3 hours.
    Besides no govt holidays are there. Even Casual leaves & Earned leaves are not granted to them.

    [Reply]