While you were sleeping…



There are many Congress leaders from Delhi who wonder why no one in Maharashtra seems able to take Sharad Pawar on.

To them I have always stated the Hindi adage : paani mein rehekar magarmachh se bair nahin (you can’t take on the crocodile in his own waters). That’s what Pawar has been and there is no Congressman who will issue any statement against the Maratha warlord for fear that he will strike back and decimate them all.

That was the main reason, I am told, for Sonia Gandhi’s disenchantment with Vilasrao Deshmukh as well – until the 2009 Lok Sabha election results she is believed to have thought that he did not do enough to limit Pawar. But, at the risk of being indiscreet, I have to share with readers an incident I was privy to several years ago — with that incident in mind I never believed that Deshmukh (elected unopposed to the Rajya Sabha this week) was not limiting Pawar. He had his own style, though.

It dates back to Deshmukh’s first term as Chief Minister. I had sought an interview with Pawar and the time he gave me overlapped with that he had given a very famous producer/director in Bombay. The director wanted a tax concession for his film and had approached Pawar for the same.

At the time Pawar was not in government either in the state or the Centre and I wondered why someone I thought was closer to the Shiv Sena-BJP alliance should come to him for that kind of favour. “They all come to me. Even Sena leaders approach me rather than Bal Thackeray for such works,” Pawar said with the smile of a Cheshire cat. “And I do not discriminate.”

As the director walked into his salon, he told me, “This is urgent. It will take only a couple of minutes. Then we will get on with the interview.’’

As it turned out, it took rather more than a couple of minutes – and this is why: when Pawar’s secretary called the Chief Minister’s official residence (it was the middle of afternoon on a weekday), he was told the CM was asleep. That so startled him out of his wits, that he did not even stop to think that there was a reporter seated in Pawar’s salon. He dashed in to break the news to Pawar in person and asked, “What shall I do, Saheb? His office says the CM should not be disturbed until six in the evening. Shall I ask him to call back?”

“No. Let it be. I will call back if necessary. Get me the Deputy Chief Minister (Chhagan Bhujbal) instead.”

Pawar then spoke to Bhujbal, told him he was sending the director across and asked him to do the “needful”.

That done, he turned to me – and I have still not forgotten the look on his face. Far from the Cheshire cat of a few minutes ago, now he looked like a cat who might have swallowed a huge dollop of sour cream. His nose looked even more snub(bed) than before and there was a tightness to his mouth as he said, “The Chief Minister of Maharashtra asleep at two in the afternoon on a working day! Can you believe that?”

“No, Mr Pawar, I can’t,” is all I could say as I tried to contain the expression on my own face, hoping it was giving nothing away.

But Pawar knew as well as I did that Deshmukh could not have been sleeping that afternoon. Or, at least, that his siesta could not have extended four hours to 6pm. However, like I said, you do not say ‘no’ to Sharad Pawar and live to tell the tale. So, I fathomed, Deshmukh had hit upon this unique bouncing technique – so very convenient, isn’t it? You cannot, after all, be held responsible for anything that happened while you were sleeping.

Over the next few years, I noticed many such subtleties, not obvious to all and never for public consumption, in the manner in which Deshmukh tackled the mighty Pawar. He drove the NCP chief to miscalculations in the hope that the NCP will get more seats and, eventually, a Chief Minister — so that Pawar would not have to depend on the mercies of a Congressman. And, after nearly a decade, in May this year the result was there for all to see.

It is no wonder, then, that Deshmukh is now being lionised in New Delhi and, I am told, Congress leaders are planning to build him up as the next big mass leader in Maharashtra.

Whatever the outcome, at least there will be the shenanigans of one more leader to entertain us all – Sharad Pawar’s and Bal Thackeray’s are almost past their sell-by date!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 3.43 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Anil

    What i find intriguing is one gets fired for screw up in mumbai blast and you would think he has been unished btu ti seems cosier offices awaits him in Delhi..

    Politicians fools us all any bureacrat wud never have seen another day light after that sort of collosus failure

    [Reply]

  • http://- Rajeev

    Only congress can lionise the person (Deshmukh) who presided over 26/11 carnage.

    I always thought politicians are very intelligent people but post 26/11, I got the real picture when Deshmukh took his son and Ram gopal verma on exclusive tour to Taj.

    I think journalists should try to support politician who work for the people (there are very few but they are there) not some nuts like Pawar, Thackray or Deshmukh.

    Note to Sujata: 26/11 is the incident that happened in Mumbai on 26/11/2008 where 170 people were killed during simultaneous attack on Taj, Oberoi, Chabad house and VT station by 10 terrorists from our peaceful neighbour pakistan.
    Pl. do write something about what remedial actions have been taken by your favoite congress-ncp leaders post 26/11.
    Regards

    [Reply]

  • Atul

    From a purely entertainment perspective, which budding politicians are the ones to watch out for?

    And do they have the potential to partly fill the boots of Pawar / Thackerey?

    [Reply]

  • http://none me

    Seems Mr Deshmukh have practice of taking long siestas all 7 days week, that why 26/11 happened . Jokes apart Indian politics is “star plus opera” where u kill the key person n after a week u see not d person is still alive same Congress did with Deshmukh . they asked hin to resigned for 26/11 incident promising him good future gift ahead n that’s wht is happening ………..

    [Reply]

  • http://pavementfreud.sulekha.com pavementfreud

    I remember Deshmukh’s post-26/11 media briefing…his shenanigans were shameful to say the least!

    That a man who’s so clumsily handled a major act of terror…is being lionised in Delhi…speaks volumes about the political class…

    [Reply]

  • http://- Rajeev

    Sujata has gone AWOL. She is posting comment on Pankaj Vohra’s blog (who happens to be Gandhi SPOON) defending poor chap.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.datatrackonline.org Ashish Kolarkar

    Vilasrao Deshmukh can never replace strature of Pawar as Congress likes pygmies not leaders. He may be lionised in Delhi but his conduct in Mumbai was not up to the mark. He could be remembered as party hopping neta. Seen in film awards functions sitting in front rows enjoying his son’s performances. He lacked the seriousness required.

    Whereas Pawar has built his own reputation as a grassroot leader. He has friends cutting party lines and he is great survivor. He is also a leader with vision. Out of Maharashtra people know only Pawar as leader of national strature from that state.

    [Reply]

  • Vijay Murugan

    India almost went to war with Pakistan not just once but many times. Probably it is our weakness and Pakistan knows it well that we are in no position to dare Pakistan. That is the reason we always step back.
    Each time India would take very strong position, but would do nothing else. The maximum we do is … we go to Uncle Sam and complain of Pakistan, just like a kid would complain about his sibling to his/her dad. Then we get a candy from dad and we think we won a jackpot – Not even bothering about whole bag full of candies is being given to the other sibling by the dad.
    Until and unless we get developed, get self sufficient and grow to be a real power, we should rather stay shut. As our credibility is gone, we always talk tall but never able to do anything practical.

    [Reply]

  • Ddnetizen

    shq13 either you are a cowardly **** or a shameless commie virus.

    **** terroristan has been attacking and murdering unarmed Indian civilians. You have any shame? oh, never mind you are a cowardly **** or a shameless commie virus.

    [Reply]

  • Riaz Murtaza

    War is not a game or fun. It is a big disaster for both India & Pakistan. Both the countries need to sit down and talk and solve all the long outstanding issue.
    The route cause of terrorism is required to be addressed to route the terrorism out of
    South Asia. Anyhow, it is not wise to wage a war just for some stupid nut terrorists.
    Pakistan itself is a victim of terror. This all terrorism is a product of after the invasion of Afghanistan.

    [Reply]

  • aks

    What scum the pakistanis are, and I wish Bhagwan, Allah and God – by whatever name we call the Almighty, takes ample revenge for their heinous acts on the Pakistanis -”shooting children and the women in their private parts at Kaluchak”. Absolute scum the Pakistanis.

    [Reply]

  • engrich

    wars did not happen because 85%bahujans who are creator of wealth wqant peace.brhmncl hate spewing and war cry has no taker in rular india.

    [Reply]

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/2EEEO3IWUNFJIR5HTH7MDTZ5EE ParminderS

    Not really! Did they know before hand about Pokharan2 ?
    They did not.
    India has been able to keep a lot of secret where it has to.
    Let the book come out and see whether there are going to be any denials, may be they will keep mum.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/nischal.sepahiya Nischal Sepahiya

    War is must now for India. No matter nuclear war. Lets our generation suffer for next 50 years. But there will be peromane solution for world. Lets remove pak out of world map and make one one bangladesh or give it to afhganistan. ISI and Pak army need a lession. No economy, no food, no education and daring to fight agaisnt India. Cut therie private parts and make them actiual HIZDA

    [Reply]