Face to face with the gracious Gandhis



The first election I ever covered, by a quirk of fate, happened to be Assam’s. I do not know why my editor in Bombay transplanted me to the North East – I had neither the experience (less than a year) nor the expertise or perspective to report from a strife-torn region of the country.

But today it helps me to boast that I cut my milk teeth in journalism reporting on riots and massacres. For soon after reaching Assam I found myself in the middle of floating bodies in the Brahmaputra (from Nellie), village after village boycotting the polls and suddenly face to face with Mrs Indira Gandhi as she came to condole the victims and bring hope to the survivors.

A file photo of Indira Gandhi

A file photo of Indira Gandhi

That was my only encounter with Mrs Gandhi but one I have never quite forgotten. For, the sheer moment of being face to face with the Prime Minister of India had got the better of me – I was shooting my own pictures and my hands started to shake so badly that I just could not find the trigger.

The Prime Minister had been condoling a woman who fell upon her chest with loud cries and tears. ” Rone se kya hota hai, behen,” Mrs Gandhi told her, even as she enfolded the woman in her arms. ” Himmat rakho.  Main aapke saath hoon aur yeh vaada karti hoon ki ab aap ke saath aisa kuch nahin hoga. (Nothing will be gained by simply crying. You have to be brave. I am with you and I assure you nothing like this will happen to you ever again). ”

Ooooh, went my mind and my heart beats increased multifold at the perfect news picture that that scene made. Mrs Gandhi knew it, too. So even as other cameras finished flashing she held the pose for me a little longer. But my fingers simply froze! Then as it took forever for me to find the button, she said with just the slightest touch of impatience, “Hurry up now, girl. I don’t have all the time in the world, you know!”

I almost dropped the camera and would really not have got that picture at all had it not been for one of her security detail. There were no Black Cats then, only a whole load of ordinary policemen and we could get really close. One of the cops nearest to me then leaned over, took the camera from my hands, aimed the lens at Mrs Gandhi and the wailing woman and pressed the click button. “There you are!” he said, as the Prime Minister moved away to condole with the next victim.

“Got nervous, did you?” he asked as he followed Mrs Gandhi. “Hope that picture comes out ok.” (It did.)

By this time my legs were quaking and I do not remember how I got through the rest of Mrs Gandhi’s visit.  But her small gesture towards a completely inexperienced reporter so overwhelmed by her presence – for she had recognised the gaucheness and tried to ease it — went a long way in teaching me about grace amid high office and power, a quality I came across in her son Rajiv, too, many years later.!”

By then I was no longer a rookie and could face a Prime Minister without quaking in my boots. I had many memorable moments with Rajiv Gandhi for he came frequently to Bombay as Prime Minister (and even after he had ceased to be one). I will write about them by and by but the moment I recall with most fondness is the time he came visiting Khan Abdul Ghafar Khan (the Frontier Gandhi) along with his wife at the Bombay Hospital.

No reporters were allowed but I worked for a wire service then and, armed with a security clearance from the Special Branch, I knew I just had to get in. I managed by getting to the floor below in the patients’ lift from the side entrance, clinging to a stretcher, pretending to be a relative. And then climbing up to the Frontier Gandhi’s floor and hanging out discreetly in the vestibule for two hours before Rajiv was scheduled to arrive and the cops sealed the floor.

I was in a spot when then Bombay Congress president Murli Deora emerged from the lift, followed by Rajiv and Sonia Gandhi. He ordered me thrown out as soon as he saw me. But Rajiv, who may not have known my name but had seen me tailing him across Bombay on many occasions,  stopped him. “Let her be. She is not coming into the room with us, is she?”

And before he disappeared inside, he threw over his shoulder at me, “We’ll speak later.”

Of course, neither the cops nor the Black Cats could throw me out after that. But I did not really believe the Prime Minister would actually take the time off to brief me himself, though H Y Sharada Prasad, travelling with him as the PM’s press secretary then, assured me he would. “If he has said he will, then he will.” And he got me a prime standing spot just outside the door, so that the PM would see me as soon as he emerged and remember his promise.

I was not shaking, of course, when Rajiv and Sonia came out and stood before me but my pen would not move fast enough across my notepad as Rajiv went into every minute detail of how he had entered the room, how Ghafar Khan’s eyes had lit up, how he had tried to sit up, how he had held his hand, and something (for I am sure it was not everything) of what they had talked about.

But what struck me most was that Rajiv spoke slowly, looking into my notebook, reading every word I wrote and keeping pace with my pen. His next sentence began only when I had put in a full stop. And he waited long seconds for that last full stop after he had finished. When I looked up for more, he was looking straight at me and said, “That’s all. I think you have got it all down all right. I have given you all the details I could. I hope that makes you happy.”

You bet it did! But I could only nod and smile, though I wanted desperately to say “thank you”  to him as I had so many years before to his mother. Simply couldn’t – because this time the cat had got my tongue!

I now have a voice that does not choke and a pen that does not freeze in such situations. I have faced all other PMs who followed  – VP Singh (arrogant) Chandrashekhar (rustic), Narasimha Rao (erudite), Deve Gowda (somewhat uncouth), Inder Gujral (somewhat listless), AB Vajpayee (painfully slow) and now Manmohan Singh (thorough gentleman).

But has there ever been a Prime Minister since who has been so charming or even one as chivalrous?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Anuj

    You are lucky lady for getting in touch with the most important persons in India.
    Yurs account sometimes make me envy my job where we don’t get anyone other than our managers to deal with.

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    I actually wanted to become a doctor but couldn’t get through the competitive exams. Became a journalist because I wasn’t good at anything else but writing….

    [Reply]

    Pankaj Reply:

    I am not contradicting myself, I am just doing what you journalist do, get the truth out to people :D .

    You fail you understand that all the time it was about “you” not “me”, don’t try to put things on me. Typical “rhetorical questions” by a journalist to save face once put in odd spot ;)

    I am open about my choice : I am pro BJP/RSS, nothing to hide or be ashamed of what my views are. (unlike you who takes money to be basied – I don’t; I use my brain)

    Congress/Gandhis are the biggest culprit and its “Congress and Gandhis” who have divided the whole country and systemticaly kept India and Indians backward for 50 years so that they can rule.

    Congress “divisive politics” had killed hundered and thousands….. India has to give up her land to China and Pak….. list is endless.

    I am not sure how can you follow “dynasty politics” and praise Congress and its dynasty leaders? Do you fail you see any wrong in them?
    Nehru > Indira > Rajiv > Sonia > Rahul / Priyanka > next gen of Gandhis

    What is the difference between “dynasty politics” and a “monarchy ” in this case?

    Also, I fail to understand how come you see and feel “blood and plight” of one community but when it comes to other community you just trun a blind eye and don’t even say a word.

    It’s Congress who needs to “pay up” to journalists like you to write for them, not BJP.

    May be you don’t like Congress but you write for them beacuse of “money”, start writing for BJP for money, may be you start liking them. :)

    You blogroll about “skeletons” is also baised, why not ask Congress /Gandhis such questions , if you want I can prepare a list for you…

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Now, now don’t get all testy and agitated! But I was right wasn’t I about your being a saffronist? So used to these kind of responses that there was almost a sense of deja vu. When saffronists don’t have a credible argument, they hope to win by insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation — all of which is apparent in your responses, so true to character. But of no consequence to me really … all in a day’s work and so amusing.So keep it rolling, friend…

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Now, now don’t get all testy and agitated! But I was right wasn’t I about your being a saffronist? So used to these kind of responses that there was almost a sense of deja vu. When saffronists don’t have a credible argument, they hope to win by insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation — all of which is apparent in your responses, so true to character. But of no consequence to me really … all in a day’s work and so amusing.So keep it rolling, friend…

    Pankaj Reply:

    If you can be a “Congressi”, whats wrong me being a BJP/RSS supporter? I am far better than two faced “pseudo secularist” like you and Congress. We live in a democarcy and as you have a choice so do I.

    Saying that I am “wrong” and you are “right” is wrong. I can give you “credible arguments” to support what I say and stand for. My offer for list of questions for congress still stands….

    Again you missed the point, as I said before it’s not about “me”, it was about “you” taking money and writing for Congress/Gandhis.

    “insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation”
    I have not used any of these. I just asked simple questions and put forward what is truth, if you find what I said intimidating” then you need to so some introspection.
    We are just having a debate.

    You are on backfoot not me. You don’t have answers to my questions and falling back to rhetorical talks.

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Ha, ha, ha. Like I said, you are so true to form!

    I do not know if I am a Congressi but I proudly admit to being a pseudo-secularist of your definition –and a majority of the people in this country are like me, I might add, or else the BJP and the RSS would have taken over long ago and would not be struggling to achieve a majority right now at the ongoing elections.

    Moreover, I was never judgmental about you — in fact you are sitting in judgment over me which is why I implied you were being presumptious. But then again, like you say, this is a free country and you are entitled to your presumptions — as I am to mine!

    Pankaj Reply:

    You are again dodging the questions I asked… typical journalist.. you won’t answer the questions which you are not comfortable with.

    You throw mud on politicans in your bolgs/writes who don’t answer your questions, but when it comes to you, you are running away.

    My defination of “pseudo-secularist” is : -
    You see and feel “blood and plight” of one community but when it comes to other community you just trun a blind eye and don’t even say a word.

    And yes, you and Congress do fall under this category. (again its FACT not presumption :) )

    Majority of Indians are still illiterate and also “Indians” tend to have “short memory” like Ghajini ;) and they keep forgetting wrong doings of Congress over 50 years. Congress is making a “fool” of people and ignorant Indians fall into trap. It’s not a presumption.. its a fact.

    Fact not “presumption” is that even Congress didn’t have majority as of today and would not have survived last no confidence motion if Amar Singh’s party had not come to support and please do not forget cash for vote scandal which CNN-IBN refused to show on TV.
    (Not to forget Cnn-ibn is also pro congress)

    Well, I did “presume” that you take money to write for Congress and asked you and the “Fact” is that you admitted you took money, so my “presumption” is/was correct.

    It was you having “deja vus”…..not me.

    I still haven’t got the answers to the questions I asked above.

    My offer for list of questions for congress still stands. ;) You can ask these question to one of “gracious” Gandhi in you next interview…. :D

    I was always “formed”, it is you who is being “formed”.

    .I wish I was a journalist. :P

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Obviously you do not understand the nuances of the language or else you would have understood what I have been saying long ago. It is not my brief to be rude to anybody or else I would have put you straight on most points long ago. If two dead Gandhis can evoke such emotion, I am not surprised the living ones are abused and maligned by your types all the time.

    But believe what you want to believe, its a free country after all. And if you really want me to answer the question about blood and gore — well the Congress did apologise and deny tickets to Jagdish Tytler and others but far from an apology the BJP is still promoting a killer, a murderer and a pogromist as a future Prime Minister who was not even wanted by his own party man in MP and an ally in Bihar this election season (and Tytler has paid me millions to say that!)

    As for your wanting to be a journalist — by your own definition, you already are!

    Pankaj Reply:

    ha ha.. you still haven’t answered my questions……and I know I won’t get answers to my questions.

    yes, i don’t understand “nuances ” of language, twist and turns, I am still getting used to “two faced” talks and people. But I am getting there :) . also I am not a journalist :)

    “two dead Gandhi’s”
    why were they assassinated in the first place? Please think about it. And where are your “emotions” for leaders like Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee , Deendayal Upadhyaya etc?

    At one time Mrs. Gandhi imposed emergency in the country to remain in power.

    “living Gandhis” are carrying dead Gandhis “legacy” and this is one of the basis congress is asking for votes. Living Gandhis have not done anything for the nation, born with sliver spoon in thier mouth.

    You say its not your berif to be rude, but you are degrading, humiliating politicians from other parties (apart from congress leaders) in your blogs/writes who don’t agree with your views or answer your questions or fit your criteria of being a secularist.

    Congress apologised only to get minority votes , and they denied tickets to Tytler and Sajjan only after shoe was thrown at home minister, if no shoe was thrown at Home Minister congress wud have still given ticket to Tytler.

    For last 25 years congress have been giving tickets to Tytler and Sajjan.

    Cant you see that?

    What is the use of an hollow apology when justice is still not served .

    It’s the pseudo-secularist media and journalists like you who have made BJP look bad by saying its BJP PM candidate is a killer and murderer.

    It’s the Gandhis who have blood of thousands on their hands.

    My offer for list of questions for congress still stands.

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Ask the Congress spokespersons for those answers.

    Pankaj Reply:

    Are you asking me to ask or you are going to ask Congress spokespersons those questions?

    I am not in position (in politcal/ journalist circles) as you to ask those questions.

    If you can ask other parties questions which they are not comfortable with, why not Congress?

    List of questions is big… starting right from 1947 :D

    Pankaj Reply:

    By the way the same ally from Bihar shook hands with people he once said he won’t meet :)

    Strange world we live in :D

  • D10

    It’s good to know that there are people in public life who don’t deride journalists whenever they come for a byte/shot! I’m sure they know that they can’t afford to be rude, but concern is very refreshing to hear about. You are very lucky!

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    This was before the era of sound byte journalism. I wonder how Indira and Rajiv would have reacted to 24×7 television … Mrs Gandhi might perhaps have looked down her nose at the cameras and Rajiv perhaps charmed them with his dimpled smiles!

    [Reply]

    Pankaj Reply:

    Mrs Gandhi would have imposed an emergency…. gagged media…but HT/CNN IBN would still be on air :D

    [Reply]

  • rajat

    Advani can be one…

    [Reply]

    Sana Reply:

    Your journey has been really interesting, hats off to you for braving the world like you do:)

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Thank you

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Grin.

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Same to you

    [Reply]

    subhash saini Reply:

    wonderfully humane!!!!!!!!!!!

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Thanks

    aaa Reply:

    Madam,

    It is disgusting to see journalists portraying the images of politicians based on personal treatment meted out to them during limited encounters rather than based on how these politicians treat and interact with the people at large who they represent. Merely helping a novice photographer take a snap does not make a politician “gracious”. Politicians in difficult times need journalists and propaganda photographs more than the journalists themselves need such photographs for their employer. How Ms. Gandhi had treated the people of this country during 1975 emergency times and how she had got JP Narayan, an old man, dragged to jail in the dead of the night would not be forgotten in haste. When personal experiences of journalists start colouring the much celebrated objectivite/neutral perception of journalists, it does not bode well for a democracy.

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Well, we can only write about it from our own personal perspectives but let me tell you not all Prime Ministers or not every politician is as gracious to journalists as you seem to suggest. I have faced many boors and many louts in my time and some of those experiences do not even bear recounting. And writing about graciousness where it does exist is not to turn a blind eye to thier faults — if we began to list the negatives most of our nationally known leaders would go under the hammer.

    And by the way, this blog is about personal experiences

    Srini Reply:

    Hmm. I wonder whether journalists tend to weigh celebs against a special scale. Ordinary politeness becomes something noteworthy enough to comment on, because, being celebs, they didn’t actually have to be polite (to journos?) I also notice this duvidhaa among most journalists — strutting peacocks ever ready to flash their press card at some humble paandu, but reduced to bluster or blabber when confronted with real power. Or worse, some kind of fake palliness (specially rampant among TV anchors, who tend to address people half a century their senior by their first name…)

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Quite right, Srini but it goes with the times — the BYP generation to be found among journalists, too, naa?

    It took me years to get on first name terms with any of the prominent leaders — and that, too, because when I first got onto first name terms with them, they were no stars but my equals in terms of age, anonymity and aspirations, give or take.

    Even today, I affix a `Mr’ when I address Sharad Pawar though youngsters who came in long after I did have no problems referring to him as Sharadrao. And they will call Vilasrao, `Vilas’ and Sushil Kumar Shinde, `Sushil’. The latter two don’t say anything but I have heard Pawar ask youngsters who address him by name to go back to journalism school for better training and then come back to him after five years!

    But they persist — that’s the yuppy generation for you!

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    I hope you enjoyed the stories, Bunny!

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Hahaha! Charming or chivalraous? Advani? Pas du tout, mon ami. Absolutely au contraire!

    [Reply]

  • Mrs. Vivian Das

    It shows journalists are also human. Senior journalists who come across as strict, one look from them can make one stutter and get stumped.
    The sharing of your experience is really nice.
    More such stories from you.

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Thanks. will try and bring as many of them as possible to you.

    [Reply]

  • http://none me

    some times fate support us strongly as it supported you on your first election coverage,But it seems u know ur job so well that even before u start its already in your hand as u plann it so well.
    i like your work .

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Thanks. Keep my fingers crossed that fate continues to support me in the continuing journey — there have been many downs, too that I will share with readers by and by

    [Reply]

  • http://www.richardorange.net Richard

    Hi,

    My friend Mary Sinfield is President of the UK’s Thackeray Society.

    She wants to know if anyone has ever got to the bottom of why our friend Bal took the same spelling as the great WIlliam Makepeace?

    Does anyone know when the name was taken — was it Bal who went for that spelling or his father?

    I read something saying that as late as 1980, Bal was spelling it Thakre….

    So is it a tribute to the Victorian Master?

    Does Bal have a cultural chip on his shoulder which is expressed both by trying to anglicise and also by insiting on Marathi?

    Are both opposite reactions to the same sense of Mahrashtrians not being given due respect?

    Mary — mary.sinfield@hotmail.co.uk, and me richardworange@gmail.com, would both like to know…

    Thanks so much,

    Richard

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    posted u a pdf fle that might give u some insights. pl check your mail.

    [Reply]

  • Pankaj

    getting money to write for Gandhis and Congress .. uh?

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Hmmm… wonder if there is a money order service from there to here?

    [Reply]

    Pankaj Reply:

    money oder/cheques/cash is outdated…..you are living is past ……bank transfers, EFT era is about.

    There is definatley some connection… your articles tell the story…

    You got money from Congress/Gandhis and you are trying to sell “Congress” to people via HT blogs/news….

    By they way, how much do you get to write for Congress/Gandhis?

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    Glad to note that you think there is some connection. And even more glad that you think I or my HT blog is crucial in selling Gandhis to the people (poor Gandhis campaigning in the heat and all!)

    And how much do I get? Well, that’s between me and whoever, surely? None of your business (literally), I should say!

    Pankaj Reply:

    If whole of India could read english “poor Gandhis” need not campain in the heat… so to beg for votes they have to go out in heat from poor indians…

    But alas majority of educated indians don’t buy your pro Congress propoganda…..so you too better join Gandhis in thier campain in heat. :)

    Well, atleast you agree you are getting money to write for Congress/Gandhis….

    I asked how much you get to write for Gandhis/Congress is beacuse if it was about money, how much to write for BJP /RSS then?

    Politicans switch… so can writers/journalist…
    :)

  • Pankaj

    If whole of India could read english “poor Gandhis” need not campain in the heat… so to beg for votes they have to go out in heat from poor indians…

    But alas majority of educated indians don’t buy your pro Congress propoganda…..so you too better join Gandhis in thier campain in heat. :)

    Well, atleast you agree you are getting money to write for Congress/Gandhis….

    I asked how much you get to write for Gandhis/Congress is beacuse if it was about money, how much to write for BJP /RSS then?

    Politicans switch… so can writers/journalist…

    [Reply]

    Sujata Anandan Reply:

    I”ll join them if I want to but funny how you contradict yourself, isn’t it — you want to say something but it does not come out right and so you clarify and add on.

    And how much to write about BJP/Rss — you tell me, because you sound very much like a saffron propagandist. Only they need to buy up journalists to keep them writing good things even as their leaders burn, kill and shed blood all over the place.

    BTW, pl read about Advani’s skeletons on my blogroll and you will know why the BJP RSS can never be charming and least of all gracious.

    [Reply]

  • Rahul

    Dear Miss, stop the blame game, who did what – the list is endless the question is giving a fair chance. I am confident this is the era of branding and packaging and the real (inside) content doesent really matter, but stop branding BJP as saffron brigade. What is happening at the moment is speaks it all there is no “dharam and eman” in politics nobody is dudh ka dhula I think congress has had a fair bit of chance to work for the country, its high time for a change and change for a reasonable duration, well you can say that its people to decide democracy etc. but media does have a role to play – let the game be fair and square. We the people are anyways kept indarkness by the great netas and their BS talks plz dont add to it by the cognitive biases some of the media representative clearly has against BJP (out of all BSP, RJD, SP etc etc ) and seriously you dont sound sophesticated or ellite by doing that.

    [Reply]

  • Balraj Bhasin

    Enjoyed reading your piece. Straight from the heart, thanks for sharing.

    [Reply]

  • rishi

    Could he have said ’single’ to let you know he is available? Most guys use that to hint especially if a girl he has started liking is on his friends list.

    [Reply]