Face to face with the gracious Gandhis
The first election I ever covered, by a quirk of fate, happened to be Assam’s. I do not know why my editor in Bombay transplanted me to the North East – I had neither the experience (less than a year) nor the expertise or perspective to report from a strife-torn region of the country.
But today it helps me to boast that I cut my milk teeth in journalism reporting on riots and massacres. For soon after reaching Assam I found myself in the middle of floating bodies in the Brahmaputra (from Nellie), village after village boycotting the polls and suddenly face to face with Mrs Indira Gandhi as she came to condole the victims and bring hope to the survivors.

A file photo of Indira Gandhi
That was my only encounter with Mrs Gandhi but one I have never quite forgotten. For, the sheer moment of being face to face with the Prime Minister of India had got the better of me – I was shooting my own pictures and my hands started to shake so badly that I just could not find the trigger.
The Prime Minister had been condoling a woman who fell upon her chest with loud cries and tears. ” Rone se kya hota hai, behen,” Mrs Gandhi told her, even as she enfolded the woman in her arms. ” Himmat rakho. Main aapke saath hoon aur yeh vaada karti hoon ki ab aap ke saath aisa kuch nahin hoga. (Nothing will be gained by simply crying. You have to be brave. I am with you and I assure you nothing like this will happen to you ever again). ”
Ooooh, went my mind and my heart beats increased multifold at the perfect news picture that that scene made. Mrs Gandhi knew it, too. So even as other cameras finished flashing she held the pose for me a little longer. But my fingers simply froze! Then as it took forever for me to find the button, she said with just the slightest touch of impatience, “Hurry up now, girl. I don’t have all the time in the world, you know!”
I almost dropped the camera and would really not have got that picture at all had it not been for one of her security detail. There were no Black Cats then, only a whole load of ordinary policemen and we could get really close. One of the cops nearest to me then leaned over, took the camera from my hands, aimed the lens at Mrs Gandhi and the wailing woman and pressed the click button. “There you are!” he said, as the Prime Minister moved away to condole with the next victim.
“Got nervous, did you?” he asked as he followed Mrs Gandhi. “Hope that picture comes out ok.” (It did.)
By this time my legs were quaking and I do not remember how I got through the rest of Mrs Gandhi’s visit. But her small gesture towards a completely inexperienced reporter so overwhelmed by her presence – for she had recognised the gaucheness and tried to ease it — went a long way in teaching me about grace amid high office and power, a quality I came across in her son Rajiv, too, many years later.!”
By then I was no longer a rookie and could face a Prime Minister without quaking in my boots. I had many memorable moments with Rajiv Gandhi for he came frequently to Bombay as Prime Minister (and even after he had ceased to be one). I will write about them by and by but the moment I recall with most fondness is the time he came visiting Khan Abdul Ghafar Khan (the Frontier Gandhi) along with his wife at the Bombay Hospital.
No reporters were allowed but I worked for a wire service then and, armed with a security clearance from the Special Branch, I knew I just had to get in. I managed by getting to the floor below in the patients’ lift from the side entrance, clinging to a stretcher, pretending to be a relative. And then climbing up to the Frontier Gandhi’s floor and hanging out discreetly in the vestibule for two hours before Rajiv was scheduled to arrive and the cops sealed the floor.
I was in a spot when then Bombay Congress president Murli Deora emerged from the lift, followed by Rajiv and Sonia Gandhi. He ordered me thrown out as soon as he saw me. But Rajiv, who may not have known my name but had seen me tailing him across Bombay on many occasions, stopped him. “Let her be. She is not coming into the room with us, is she?”
And before he disappeared inside, he threw over his shoulder at me, “We’ll speak later.”
Of course, neither the cops nor the Black Cats could throw me out after that. But I did not really believe the Prime Minister would actually take the time off to brief me himself, though H Y Sharada Prasad, travelling with him as the PM’s press secretary then, assured me he would. “If he has said he will, then he will.” And he got me a prime standing spot just outside the door, so that the PM would see me as soon as he emerged and remember his promise.
I was not shaking, of course, when Rajiv and Sonia came out and stood before me but my pen would not move fast enough across my notepad as Rajiv went into every minute detail of how he had entered the room, how Ghafar Khan’s eyes had lit up, how he had tried to sit up, how he had held his hand, and something (for I am sure it was not everything) of what they had talked about.
But what struck me most was that Rajiv spoke slowly, looking into my notebook, reading every word I wrote and keeping pace with my pen. His next sentence began only when I had put in a full stop. And he waited long seconds for that last full stop after he had finished. When I looked up for more, he was looking straight at me and said, “That’s all. I think you have got it all down all right. I have given you all the details I could. I hope that makes you happy.”
You bet it did! But I could only nod and smile, though I wanted desperately to say “thank you” to him as I had so many years before to his mother. Simply couldn’t – because this time the cat had got my tongue!
I now have a voice that does not choke and a pen that does not freeze in such situations. I have faced all other PMs who followed – VP Singh (arrogant) Chandrashekhar (rustic), Narasimha Rao (erudite), Deve Gowda (somewhat uncouth), Inder Gujral (somewhat listless), AB Vajpayee (painfully slow) and now Manmohan Singh (thorough gentleman).
But has there ever been a Prime Minister since who has been so charming or even one as chivalrous?
Hindustan Times



(9 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)

Sujata Anandan Reply:
April 27th, 2009 at 4:17 pm
I actually wanted to become a doctor but couldn’t get through the competitive exams. Became a journalist because I wasn’t good at anything else but writing….
[Reply]
Pankaj Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 5:38 am
I am not contradicting myself, I am just doing what you journalist do, get the truth out to people
.
You fail you understand that all the time it was about “you” not “me”, don’t try to put things on me. Typical “rhetorical questions” by a journalist to save face once put in odd spot
I am open about my choice : I am pro BJP/RSS, nothing to hide or be ashamed of what my views are. (unlike you who takes money to be basied – I don’t; I use my brain)
Congress/Gandhis are the biggest culprit and its “Congress and Gandhis” who have divided the whole country and systemticaly kept India and Indians backward for 50 years so that they can rule.
Congress “divisive politics” had killed hundered and thousands….. India has to give up her land to China and Pak….. list is endless.
I am not sure how can you follow “dynasty politics” and praise Congress and its dynasty leaders? Do you fail you see any wrong in them?
Nehru > Indira > Rajiv > Sonia > Rahul / Priyanka > next gen of Gandhis
What is the difference between “dynasty politics” and a “monarchy ” in this case?
Also, I fail to understand how come you see and feel “blood and plight” of one community but when it comes to other community you just trun a blind eye and don’t even say a word.
It’s Congress who needs to “pay up” to journalists like you to write for them, not BJP.
May be you don’t like Congress but you write for them beacuse of “money”, start writing for BJP for money, may be you start liking them.
You blogroll about “skeletons” is also baised, why not ask Congress /Gandhis such questions , if you want I can prepare a list for you…
[Reply]
Sujata Anandan Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Now, now don’t get all testy and agitated! But I was right wasn’t I about your being a saffronist? So used to these kind of responses that there was almost a sense of deja vu. When saffronists don’t have a credible argument, they hope to win by insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation — all of which is apparent in your responses, so true to character. But of no consequence to me really … all in a day’s work and so amusing.So keep it rolling, friend…
Sujata Anandan Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Now, now don’t get all testy and agitated! But I was right wasn’t I about your being a saffronist? So used to these kind of responses that there was almost a sense of deja vu. When saffronists don’t have a credible argument, they hope to win by insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation — all of which is apparent in your responses, so true to character. But of no consequence to me really … all in a day’s work and so amusing.So keep it rolling, friend…
Pankaj Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
If you can be a “Congressi”, whats wrong me being a BJP/RSS supporter? I am far better than two faced “pseudo secularist” like you and Congress. We live in a democarcy and as you have a choice so do I.
Saying that I am “wrong” and you are “right” is wrong. I can give you “credible arguments” to support what I say and stand for. My offer for list of questions for congress still stands….
Again you missed the point, as I said before it’s not about “me”, it was about “you” taking money and writing for Congress/Gandhis.
“insulting, abusing, pompous presumptions or just plain intimidation”
I have not used any of these. I just asked simple questions and put forward what is truth, if you find what I said intimidating” then you need to so some introspection.
We are just having a debate.
You are on backfoot not me. You don’t have answers to my questions and falling back to rhetorical talks.
Sujata Anandan Reply:
May 6th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Ha, ha, ha. Like I said, you are so true to form!
I do not know if I am a Congressi but I proudly admit to being a pseudo-secularist of your definition –and a majority of the people in this country are like me, I might add, or else the BJP and the RSS would have taken over long ago and would not be struggling to achieve a majority right now at the ongoing elections.
Moreover, I was never judgmental about you — in fact you are sitting in judgment over me which is why I implied you were being presumptious. But then again, like you say, this is a free country and you are entitled to your presumptions — as I am to mine!
Pankaj Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
You are again dodging the questions I asked… typical journalist.. you won’t answer the questions which you are not comfortable with.
You throw mud on politicans in your bolgs/writes who don’t answer your questions, but when it comes to you, you are running away.
My defination of “pseudo-secularist” is : -
You see and feel “blood and plight” of one community but when it comes to other community you just trun a blind eye and don’t even say a word.
And yes, you and Congress do fall under this category. (again its FACT not presumption
)
Majority of Indians are still illiterate and also “Indians” tend to have “short memory” like Ghajini
and they keep forgetting wrong doings of Congress over 50 years. Congress is making a “fool” of people and ignorant Indians fall into trap. It’s not a presumption.. its a fact.
Fact not “presumption” is that even Congress didn’t have majority as of today and would not have survived last no confidence motion if Amar Singh’s party had not come to support and please do not forget cash for vote scandal which CNN-IBN refused to show on TV.
(Not to forget Cnn-ibn is also pro congress)
Well, I did “presume” that you take money to write for Congress and asked you and the “Fact” is that you admitted you took money, so my “presumption” is/was correct.
It was you having “deja vus”…..not me.
I still haven’t got the answers to the questions I asked above.
My offer for list of questions for congress still stands.
You can ask these question to one of “gracious” Gandhi in you next interview….
I was always “formed”, it is you who is being “formed”.
.I wish I was a journalist.
Sujata Anandan Reply:
May 7th, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Obviously you do not understand the nuances of the language or else you would have understood what I have been saying long ago. It is not my brief to be rude to anybody or else I would have put you straight on most points long ago. If two dead Gandhis can evoke such emotion, I am not surprised the living ones are abused and maligned by your types all the time.
But believe what you want to believe, its a free country after all. And if you really want me to answer the question about blood and gore — well the Congress did apologise and deny tickets to Jagdish Tytler and others but far from an apology the BJP is still promoting a killer, a murderer and a pogromist as a future Prime Minister who was not even wanted by his own party man in MP and an ally in Bihar this election season (and Tytler has paid me millions to say that!)
As for your wanting to be a journalist — by your own definition, you already are!
Pankaj Reply:
May 9th, 2009 at 6:44 am
ha ha.. you still haven’t answered my questions……and I know I won’t get answers to my questions.
yes, i don’t understand “nuances ” of language, twist and turns, I am still getting used to “two faced” talks and people. But I am getting there
. also I am not a journalist
“two dead Gandhi’s”
why were they assassinated in the first place? Please think about it. And where are your “emotions” for leaders like Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee , Deendayal Upadhyaya etc?
At one time Mrs. Gandhi imposed emergency in the country to remain in power.
“living Gandhis” are carrying dead Gandhis “legacy” and this is one of the basis congress is asking for votes. Living Gandhis have not done anything for the nation, born with sliver spoon in thier mouth.
You say its not your berif to be rude, but you are degrading, humiliating politicians from other parties (apart from congress leaders) in your blogs/writes who don’t agree with your views or answer your questions or fit your criteria of being a secularist.
Congress apologised only to get minority votes , and they denied tickets to Tytler and Sajjan only after shoe was thrown at home minister, if no shoe was thrown at Home Minister congress wud have still given ticket to Tytler.
For last 25 years congress have been giving tickets to Tytler and Sajjan.
Cant you see that?
What is the use of an hollow apology when justice is still not served .
It’s the pseudo-secularist media and journalists like you who have made BJP look bad by saying its BJP PM candidate is a killer and murderer.
It’s the Gandhis who have blood of thousands on their hands.
My offer for list of questions for congress still stands.
Sujata Anandan Reply:
May 11th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Ask the Congress spokespersons for those answers.
Pankaj Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:29 am
Are you asking me to ask or you are going to ask Congress spokespersons those questions?
I am not in position (in politcal/ journalist circles) as you to ask those questions.
If you can ask other parties questions which they are not comfortable with, why not Congress?
List of questions is big… starting right from 1947
Pankaj Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:34 am
By the way the same ally from Bihar shook hands with people he once said he won’t meet
Strange world we live in