Let’s invest in Olympian dreams
India has leaders in abundance but few among them are heroes or role models. The political among them thrive on caste loyalties, pelf and patronage; the Bollywood stars on fantasy, glamour and media glare. It’s in the field of sports that one stumbles on stories of human perseverance, dedication and hard work despite daunting roadblocks.
The medal winners back home from the London Olympics gave India so much to cheer amid despondency. Big cash rewards for them by state governments, the Centre and a host of other thunder-seekers left one wondering where all this money was tucked away when sportspersons now feted as national heroes were preparing for the games. About time that governments in states and at the Centre pushed sports and related activities higher on their list of priorities.
The country needs as many decorated Olympians that it can produce to channel youthful energy in healthy pursuits at a time drug addition, commodity fetish and other self defeating pastimes are weakening precious human resource.
The time isn’t to rest on our oars. The declared goal should be to produce world class athletes beyond the domain of cricket through careful talent-hunts in the countryside, especially the north-east and the tribal belts where violent movements rooted in deep alienation, denial of basic rights and human dislocation are playing havoc with the national fabric. Mary Kom, Vijay Kumar, Sushil Kumar and Yogeshwar Dutt were born poor but have enriched the country like never before. Let’s have more of them. Lets aim at Olympic gold, not merely silver or bronze. India deserves and is capable of much better.
Hindustan Times



(6 votes, average: 3.67 out of 5)

Anonymous Reply:
August 13th, 2012 at 4:52 pm
Vijay-
Agree.
However, India has to follow a US model. It cannot be money allocated to govt departments/sports ministries for bureaucrats and politicians to steal,
US won hundreds of medals. They do not have a sports ministry/department either at the federal level or at the state level.
[Reply]
vijay ! Reply:
August 13th, 2012 at 6:32 pm
I am sure the schools and colleges in US would be the motivaters of sport. I think the same is not true in India. Maybe we need our government support and infrastructure. However we could do with more private participation.
[Reply]
Anonymous Reply:
August 13th, 2012 at 8:06 pm
What is the working model ?
How do stadia and infrastructure get built there? Who does the planning and budget allocation ?
Do sports federations collect taxes / donations and fund the infrastructure directly?
[Reply]
Anonymous Reply:
August 14th, 2012 at 12:48 am
Good questions. Let us segregate professional sports and amateurs ports.
All or almost all high schools (9th grade to 12th grade) have all sorts of athletic facilities – track/field, gymnastics, swimming, foot ball (American) teams, basket ball teams etc. These are funded by a part of the property tax; school boards decide the allocation for sports,and most allocate generously because of the pride factor in winning. Once these kids graduate, there are public facilities – city swimming pools etc that kids can take advantage of. The inter school competitions bring the best to the forefront. The kids who want to go after Olympics etc pursue this with their own money to appoint a coach etc.
High school sports in many states, especially southern states and Texas is almost like pro sports, from a competitiveness, news coverage etc..
As far as professional basket balll, football etc is concerned, the stadiums in general are built by cities hosting the teams, and they give tax breaks attarcting teams to move. So, some of the teams move from city A to city B because city B constructs a new stadium and give tax break on earnings.
Anonymous Reply:
August 14th, 2012 at 3:53 am
The idea of club is a relatively recent phenomenon. The state does participate in the infrastructure building in the ‘beginning’.
In India too private sponsorers have started taking over sports. The Mittal foundation sponsoring archery is a recent case. When there will be substantial private participation, the state participation will lessen and the focus will shift.