Pranab will be assertive, not adversarial
Dr A P J Abdul Kalam isn’t a politician. He’s a scientist who once headed India’s missile development programme that’s essentially about keeping a projectile on course to hit a target.
It was perhaps for this reason that he relied on his scientific temper to turn down Mamata Banerjee’s and the BJP’s last ditch bid to set him up as a presidential candidate. He knew the numbers were against him. That he stood no chance of winning against Pranab Mukherjee.
The learned scientist decided therefore against being a dud missile in the hands of the saffron party. And whatever little chances there were of he agreeing to the token contest were extinguished by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s call for an Opposition consensus over his name.
The ham-handed BJP move — and I write this without prejudice or bias — disregarded Kalam’s 2002 presidential foray that had, besides the NDA, the TDP and the SP, the support of the Congress party. To push the former President into a fight he was likely to lose was crass opportunism. Kalam wasn’t obviously game. Not especially when he was sought to be used as a pawn on the political chess-board.
It’s always unfair to compare individuals. But at times it’s inescapable! I’ve no doubt that Kalam doesn’t require to be President again to be important. The same is largely true of Pranab Mukherjee. No other nominee in recent years has transported to the presidency the wealth of experience and first hand knowledge of the system the Finance Minister will take to the high office.
I’m certain that Mukherjee’s wouldn’t be a rubber-stamp presidency. At the same time — a stickler for form that he is — he’d do nothing to be in conflict with an elected regime, now or after 2014, when a change of government might well happen.
The best suited man for an overlapping presidency. That’s what Mukherjee happens to be. I doubt whether the assertion will be questioned even by BJP big-wigs. They all know how helpful the Congress’s presidential aspirant was as chairman of the parliamentary standing committee on home affairs during the NDA rule.
Hindustan Times




Anonymous Reply:
June 18th, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Ravi-
What is your basis when you make a judgment that he will be an “excellent” president?
Of course, as FM, he presided over a decline in the economy.
He has held several ministries, but will that in itself make him an ‘excellent” Prez?
He will definitely be better than the current old stooge; but will be interested in hearing how you assessed his excellence – was it performance of the myriads of ministries he headed?
[Reply]
Ravi Reply:
June 18th, 2012 at 2:31 pm
Shoeb
Let me invert your question.
Tell me why do you think that he will not make an EXCELLENT President.
What – in your opinion are the qualities that would make a man an excellant president and which of those qualities can not be found in Mr Mukherjee.
For me he is knowledgeable, erudite, intelligent, suave, he has been through the political mill, he is very distinguished and above all he has an excellant “Made in Texas” BS deflector.
[Reply]
Anonymous Reply:
June 18th, 2012 at 3:48 pm
Shoeb,
what this fake Ravi meant is Pranab will make an excellent president whan compared to Zardari!
[Reply]
NitinGupta Reply:
June 18th, 2012 at 4:54 pm
My assessment is that he will not be a tentative president. His knowledge about the constitution is excellent. So he may just shoot from the hip. Any Govt should be wary of him and be alert.
[Reply]