Introspection time for MPs
Parliament turns sixty on May 13. And while it celebrates six decades of its existence, it would be appropriate for it to reflect upon the efficacy of the system in general and the image of the parliamentarian in particular.
The electorate sends representatives to parliament to legislate on key issues that touch the people. But debates in the two Houses are increasingly getting drowned in the often loud and shrill public discourse navigated by the media, especially the electronic media.
Even while parliamentarians stall debates in the House, they can be seen locking horns in TV talk shows and panel discussions. Such engagements are short on substance and high on rhetoric. There are of course some honorable exceptions to the rule.
What then needs to be done to restore people’s trust in parliament and its members? Can some basics be sorted out to reduce hostility, restore sanity and salvage the wisdom most elected representatives possess but are unable to showcase?
That should be the subject of discussion and a possible political consensus when members assemble to mark the occasion this weekend. They can in this endeavor take inspiration from our founding fathers whose far-sightedness and sagacity enriched debates of the Constituent Assembly and the discourse that happened in the early life of Parliament as we know it today.
Parliamentary democracy has its flaws, its propensity for chaos and calamity. But it’s still the best system to make the rulers accountable. The last time a threat was posed to its basic tenets — such as freedom of speech and the rule of law — people lost little time in throwing out Indira Gandhi, Independent India’s most powerful and charismatic leader.
With the economy opening up and the influence of private and foreign capital growing by the day, seeming all-pervasive at times, the need for a strong, accountable and credible parliamentary system is greater than ever before. We can penalize a wayward MP or party by defeating them at the hustings after five years. But there’s no easy way of reigning in Capital— calling the shots from outside— without the instrumentality of a robust Parliament.
Hindustan Times





Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 3:06 pm
Mohan
How do you relate what you have said with the STRRET Political theater – much the prefered venue for our Parliamentary Opposition Party and other Pressure Groups
[Reply]
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Are you advocating that the protest on the street against the incumbent govt. and a campaign to create awareness among the masses about the issues like corruption, price rise, black money is hurting the democracy? Even Mr. Sharma is not suggesting that.
On the contrary, he is saying that the money (capital) is calling the shots. The FM is so scared of it that he had to defer a decision on GAAR till April, 2013.
We also see how the same money (the source could be business or politics) is also controling the media. We have a significant number of people who blindly trust whatever is shown on TV – Nirmal Baba being an example. Any solutions?
[Reply]
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:03 pm
Am I suggesting that or are you??
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:07 pm
Hi Iswar
Are you the economist Iswar Prasad? You seem to be as (or more) smarter than him.. I found him quite interesting…
just clarifying.
And do visit this blog more often. Also pl meet with Vijay and share too since both of you are in Delhi
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:28 pm
Gopi ji,
I would try to find out who this Iswar Prasad is. I am a nobody living in Delhi and would hopefully bump into Vijay someday – I am mostly away from the blogs over the weekends – time for a bit of life away from the cyberworld. And you know what, I have a photograph of Mohan – my wife and the kid had a chance to enjoy his wonderful hospitality a couple of weeks back in Dubai on their way back from UK.
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 3:59 pm
You are talking about your country, which has no parliamentary democracy as we know it in India.
The blog is about celebrating sixty years of Indian parliament.
[Reply]
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:02 pm
Ofcourse, how remiss of me
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:12 pm
Mr Ravi
I noted that you had given lot of gaali to me in last blog. I was busy with shop and computer was doing accounts in day time. Yaad rakhana. If you give gaali to RSS last night treatment will be repeat double.
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:14 pm
Let us start. I have not had a good fight for a while Mr GandKhotra
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:20 pm
I think u r very shamfeull. first you become ladyboy slave of Hafees Saieyed adn now give gali. Very bad
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:23 pm
And what do u think u are.
A catamite of Mohan Bhagwat
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:33 pm
very bad language . You put on image of RSS and act like behroopiya dalal. I think you suffer piles and can only repeat one word all time. RSS RSS ETC
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Just as you can only use one word Hafeez Sayed. I think yor prostate giving you some trouble.
Mr Gandkhotra. I can go on and on and Ariston as your guru knows very well
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:59 pm
Ravi kasab ou will meet houri in jannat. In this duniya mere shabd ki churri will give maut to you
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:06 pm
Can maut be worse than having to read your frookhabdi rubbish
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:23 pm
Your kafan will have you sad dialogue
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 6:14 pm
DOWN WITH THE PARLIAMENTARIANS !
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 6:12 pm
PARLIAMENT MUST BE RETIRED & NEW SYSTEM BROUGHT IN IT’S PLACE !
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:12 pm
How ’sad’ that we are talking about 60 years of Indian parliament and not about Hindu Rashtra. It must be surely hurting many here.
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:17 pm
Everything will be OK if the following happenned.
1. Make India’s constitution HINDU
2. Then put a few million people in their place.
3. Compromise democracy by disenfranchising all the people likely to vote for the oppsition.
4. I can go on but hey the Hagemonic Owner has just woken up from his siesta
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Mr Ravi kasab
Why are you trying to make Hindu look like Paksitani dalal?
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:45 pm
The only dalla here is. YOU
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:57 pm
Ravi kasab you are Lakhiv trained ISI Dalla
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:59 pm
You are a untrainable but still a Dalla.
I can and will continue!!
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:19 pm
you will continue to be ISI dalla? Allh will kick you in bhu_ _
shekhar gandotra Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:21 pm
mr Manohar you seem to be Sambha type saathi of Ravi in hunt for hurting HIndu feelings
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:40 pm
Manohar
You are really fishing.
There is nothing wrong for India being a Hindu Rashtra, as long as it means it will follow Sanathan Dharma, and not a particular ritualistic religion. In fact, I wish our politicians strive for a Ramarajya or a rajya based on sanathan dharma.
Come to think of it, I rather live in a Hindu Rashtra (even if it means the state religion is Hindu) rather than in an Islamic republic like Pakistan, Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia, or the other scores.
If you go back in time in India, there was nothing called a state religion or emperor’s religion until the Islamic invasion. One side of my ancestors came to the Malabar coast two milleniums ago; they had a different worshipping style, the local king did not have a problem with that…it was “ekam st vipra bahudha vadanti” then; and it is still the same for most of the inhabitants of this blessed country. .
Ravi Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 4:50 pm
In that case you are not aware of the kind of Hindu Rashtra the RSS is really aiming for.
It will be a Hindu Pakistan. Believe me.
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:24 pm
Gopi
I do not fish.
One particular state religion for India is totally unacceptable given the immense religious, ethnic and regional diversity of our country.
Even when the British were ruling us and consolidated what we have today – India, too did not make any religion superior to all the others. There were no state sponsored drives or laws to convert the native population to Christianity, though private church sponsored groups did try to that, but with limited success.
The fact we have a secular constitution is the strongest argument to demolish the two-nation theory and it has – the intelligentsia in Pakistan openly admit it is so, especially after the creation of Bangladesh. Of course, the RSS would not like anything better than just the opposite. Make their version of Hinduism as a monolithic fountainhead, under some mistaken belief that they will be able to control the masses through the instruments of religion and its rituals.
I am very well aware of the fact you would not mind living under Hindu Rashtra – your posts here are clear and ample indication to that effect.
The option is not between Hindu Rashtra or some Islamicstan, it is between any one religion and secularism and our founding fathers were wise enough to make the right choice.
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:34 pm
The biggest mistake our founding fathers did was to write their treatise on religion within the constitutiion. Why even mention about religion?
How does US operate as a secular country without any reference to “religion” in their constitution?
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:52 pm
To make it amply clear in black and white to all and sundry that religion will not be a factor in the state policy.
The US was did not have to face the problem of too many religions – primarily there were different strains of Christianity only.
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:37 pm
btw you fished.
Shenoy did not say he is upset about the celbration not being the 60 years of Hindu rashtra. . You are the one who coloured it to his sadness that they are not celbrating the 60 years of Hindu nation
Anonymous Reply:
May 7th, 2012 at 5:50 pm
Didn’t you notice -sad within quotes. I think not. You have chosen to take me on, as you seem to have a problem with me.
Have I ever seen you do the same when he continually goes about spreading lies, falsehoods, untruths and innuendos about some of us and others in general and that too in the foulest language? Not that I recall. Why these double standards?