Parliament must stoop to conquer
My respect for Parliament is anchored in my commitment to parliamentary democracy. For that reason, I’m convinced that citizens should be deferential towards elected bodies — from the gram panchayat to the Lok Sabha.
But at a time when the credibility of the political class has touched its Nadir, a greater responsibility devolves on parliamentarians to desist from actions that bring them in the line of public ire. It’s for this reason that I consider as an act of misplaced arrogance the bid to haul up Anna Hazare’s associates for breach of parliamentary privileges.
This is not to suggest that I in any way approve of Kiran Bedi’s on-stage antics, Arvind Kejriwal’s self-righteous hyperbole and Prashant Bhushan’s insinuations against members of parliament. But Parliament has to show greater maturity and tolerance as an institution designed to serve rather than punish people. The privileges it has invoked are meant to be used as a shield— and not as a sword.
More importantly, public perception is supportive of Anna’s teammates, not the action Parliament has proposed against them. People believe the trio is persecuted for having humbled the government in particular and parliamentarians in general. The idea clearly is harebrained even if somebody believes that booking the anti-graft activists for being disrespectful to Parliament would pit them against the institution nobody wants insulted or diminished.
Purely for the sake of form, the best course available to MPs is to restrict their expression of annoyance with the unapologetic threesome to a reprimand or a censure. Sending them to jail will be as big a blunder as their August 16 detention alongside Anna.
This makes sense to me because as the highest law making body, Parliament has to be an embodiment of tolerance and forgiveness. That alone will restore to the institution fighting for its honor, the legislative and moral supremacy vested in it by the vote of the sovereign, which is the people.
In that limited sense, Anna’s right when he says people are the masters, politicians the servants. To conquer therefore, Parliament must stoop.
Hindustan Times





wasim Reply:
September 6th, 2011 at 10:26 am
@ I agree that citizen has every right to criticize the MPs ..but the time when people are looking at you and you are in serious business (against corruption) you are not suppose to act like JONNY LEVER or RAJU SHRIVASTAV..What kiran bedi did was wrong and she has lost her credibility at least in my eyes, which she call as a game changer …hahah/// dancing and making mimickri of politition,, I was wondering wheather is this any kind of stage show planned …poor ANNA was nothing more than a puppet…why not all the member went on fasting with ANNA JII..at some point of time I felt that they have enforced fasting on anna ..
what I have felt during this movement is that, ANNA and CO making us realise that corruption will end only with JAN LOK PAL BILL not by our simple good deeds.secondly what we have understood from this movement is that once JAN LOK PAL BILL pass corruption will finish and no longer we have to ..bribe the HAWALDAR after driving without licence or crossing red signal, in other institution our work will be done without required paper …everyone want corrupt free INDIA but none want to sacrifice….lastly can any one explain me becoz this question was raise in the parliament …MPs are servent of public or representative of public..
[Reply]
shan Reply:
September 7th, 2011 at 12:34 am
@Wasim , you must be from the cow belt. YOU CHOOSE AND PREFER TO BRIBE THE HAWALDAR after driving through the red light signal ot driving without license.
A SIMPLE WAY TO AVOID PAYING BRIBE TO HAWALDAR
DO NOT DRIVE THROUGH RD SIGNAL
DO NOT DRIVE A CAR WITHOUT DRIVING LICENSE
PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH
CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME
PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE
[Reply]