Agent Provocateurs
The Pakistani media is a mix of the good and the bad. Like our own. A wide section of it is inimically India-centric— like our own who think Pak-bashing is a sure way of engaging audience.
In relative terms, I still rate our media as more diligent while sourcing and crosschecking facts.
At times, they do go overboard but aren’t, like some Pakistani counterparts, behaving as stenographers. Forged papers pedaled as Wikileaks documents by a news agency and a news portal illustrate best the phenomenon.
In the instant case, even relatively responsible English language newspapers such as The News, The Nation and The Express Tribune, a partner of the International Herald Tribune used the documents without verification. They could have reverted to the original recipients of the Wikileaks feed— The Guardian and New York Times— to verify their authenticity. They didn’t.
Acting out of predilections rather than foresight, they found the forgery irresistible — talk as it did of Indian involvement in Balochistan and Waziristan; Indian military leaders as incompetent and Kashmir as another Bosnia.
They cared not that the original purveyor of fake leaks–- Online News Agency — was a propaganda tool of the Pak Army and Daily Mail, the newspaper that first hoisted the forgery on its website, a newspaper known for publishing gossip, conspiracy theories and other stuff normally used to blackmail, misguide or character-assassinate.
The faux pas has triggered a debate on journalistic ethics in Pakistan. But its outcome is unlikely to change the media’s approach to India. What makes me all the more pessimistic is a phone call I received the other night from a friend with whom I’ve worked over the past decade to build peace between our two countries. “Nobody publishes me in Pakistan any more,” he said of his writings on India-Pakistan peace and cooperation.
Quite obviously, the Army and the secret agencies hold complete and total sway over the country’s affairs. The issue to be probed is as to who did the forgery? How the fakes got into newspapers is a no-brainer; intelligence inspired stories being a daily affair in Pakistani publications.
Journalists who refuse to play ball with snoops get threatened, beaten up and even have their houses burgled. I know many such upright Pakistani scribes whose struggle against army dictators and civilian autocrats has few parallels in India.
My own experience in India is somewhat similar. I find the constituency for peace shrinking every day— be it on account of Wikileaks, Islamabad’s prevarications on bringing the culprits of 26/11 to justice or the daily dose of adversarial statements. Even the most ardent of Indian peaceniks are lying low, unsure of the road ahead.
Indian media that played the facilitator in the past hasn’t been on board since 26/11. Its skepticism is only reinforced by propaganda meant to vilify India on the lines desired by the Pak Army, its intelligence agencies and their beachheads in Pak newspapers and TV channels. A bit of that malaise is visible also on our side with intelligence-based stories finding space without much ado.
The clout of secret agencies has been a reality in Pakistan since the days of General Zia-ul-Haq. But in India, the trend’s relatively new, felt with full force with the recent disclosure of the Radia tapes.
Regardless of who let the tapes out, snoops or corporate rivals, the revelations have hit the media the most. A top Pak TV anchor had had to similarly run for cover after leakage of a recorded conversation in which he was heard exchanging notes with a Taliban leader on intelligence operatives. A former ISI chief also went public recently with details of money distributed to put together a regime in the 1990s.
Gathering information is no easy task as a thin line distinguishes journalists from lobbyists and spies. Tread carefully. That’s the moral to be drawn from Radia tapes in India and fakeleaks in Pakistan.
Hindustan Times





Rahmat Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 4:15 am
Let us not bring in Noam Chomsky the blatantly anti establishment iconoclast who has lost any relevance. I can tell this on some authority based on my living and working in Boston at one time, and having closely followed Chomsky career graph and work. Even his contributions to linguistics are seriously being reexamined. He is totally consumed by self seeking gibberish.
To call Pakistan media totally free would be an abject absurdity as would applying similar label to media in India where it is not the nationalism but the sensationalism that trumps everything. Now let us not exonerate Gen. Musharaf who had journalist toe every line. Remember how he dismissed judges and made them swear allegiance to him that led to many noble self respecting judges to resign rather than mortgage their conscience to a dictator who bit the very hand that fed him.
[Reply]
Naveed Khan Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 9:08 am
Pakistan should concentrate west and north west fro alliances, business and neighborly ties and ignore India. India can never be Pakistan’s friend because seep inside Indians have not accepted Pakistan. China, Iran, Afghanistan, Turkey, Central Asian republics should the focus of Pakistan. India will always an enemy. Pakistan must Never provide trade and air routes to India.
[Reply]
ibiubu111 Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 9:30 am
….well said, I totally agree.
B.V.SHENOY Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 9:33 am
Naveed Khan,
your suggestion for Pakistan to look west (US) and north (Europe) is eminently sensible. You can beg for money and arms and they are always ready to loosen their purse strings. They are always willing to listen to your breast-beating tales of India trying to destroy you. You can also blackmail them and arm-twist them to give you more and ever more money just to keep your country afloat. China can only humour you along to spite India.
No other country will allow another vassal state to blackmail and/or dictate terms even while begging for alms.
G. Mustafa Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 10:05 am
Naveed,
Too late call, already Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Hindustan have signed the gas pipeline deal.
Pakistan has even allowed Afghanistan for transit trade facilities to have links with India.
India too has shown tremendous interest following the trails of China and to have investments in Afghanistan for good reasons (have my fingures crossed). Good if they stick to development plans, I doubt if it comes through altruism.
vijay kumar Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 11:41 am
I think India will give a peaceful, non violent method of development to Afghanistan. The afghanis are gentle peaceloving people who were used by Pakistanis and CIA to become Islamic fighters and Taliban, They have a lot of affection for India.
In case India manages to give them a meanginful, secular model of growth, hopefully Pakistan will also start reforming…. I am keeping my fingers crossed…
G. Mustafa Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 1:13 pm
Why not Nepal, they have Maoist rebellion, why not Burma they have political turmoil? Would Inida like to invest there? These countries are India’s first door neighbours, they are more in need than Afghanistan.
Dont come up with self made excuses, atleast introspect the very formula you propose. Media in India should make aware its large masses for this change.
Rajeev Reply:
December 15th, 2010 at 1:34 am
Mr.Mustafa,
India provides for 50% budget of Bhutan, gives substantial aid to Nepal, just given USD 1bn soft loan to Bangladesh, helps Sri lanka with aid so what’s wrong if we help Afgahnistan.
We are even willing to help you if you leave your terrorist ways..
vijay kumar Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 11:43 am
@ Naveed
Not onl has India accepted Pakistan but also the fact that most Indians are very very happy that we seperated at birth.
Tell me one thing in Pakistani history you can be proud of??
B.V.SHENOY Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 4:59 pm
It is more like ‘doomed at birth’
Raju Kurien Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 5:42 pm
Is there any detailed study/authoritative book published on Pakistan/India as to why one country prospered in spite of seemingly monumental difficulties while the other country continued to spiral down although both countries, relatively speaking, started at the same foundtion, and in a sense almost same people..
Was one genetically predisposed to an authoritarian rule (army/dictator)? Did they start with religion as paramount or did some later day rulers injected strong religion? Why was land redistribution never done and never demanded by the masses..
Obviously all the choices made by Pakistan were in the wrong track.. Was it total stupidity or were there contextual reasons?
How did democracy and particpation become widely ingrained (as we can see from th Bihar election) in India where as it never got a chance there?
Is it Islam, or corrupt leadership, or lack of leadership, …..
I will appreciate if any one knows of any book that does the comparative study
Rajeev Reply:
December 15th, 2010 at 1:35 am
Naveed,
You pakistanis are decendents of Arab, Turks, Mongol, tight-assed greek so better beg from them. We don’t want you begging around in the neighbourhood anyway.
FK - Karachi Reply:
December 19th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Seems like this blog is not a place known for having readers with a balanced view and approach, I regularly ready the dawn blogs and honestly i find the Indian contributors there both balanced and logical in their approach as are the Pakistani comments. All i can read here are hateful statements that stem from no study or data just facts that are made up.
Sorry but i cant help but laugh at one of the comments here,
you sir have obviously never been to Afghanistan or met an Afghan. no disrespect to the Afghan nation but if there was no one else to fight they would probably fight each other which by the way they have for hundreds of years and they seem very proud of it.
Vijay said that “afghans are peace loving ppl”.
G. Mustafa Reply:
December 14th, 2010 at 10:23 am
Rahmat,
I’ll leave Chomsky aside to me he is still a good critic if not an expert linguist (will defend on some other day).
Yes, Gen Musharaff had tried his level best during those days but quite a lot media communication channel to express one made start during early days of his regime. The media in Pakistan is still immature, it is free though as i see. The trouble is if it develops into a mafia. That needs an authority check.
[Reply]
Mahesh Reply:
December 15th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
Rehmat,
You said :
” I can tell this on some authority based on my living and working in Boston at one time, and having closely followed Chomsky career graph and work. ”
Huh ? Since when has geographical proximity become a license to authoritatively comment on someone’s work ?
” Even his contributions to linguistics are seriously being reexamined. ”
Do you mean his contribiution or his theories ? Care to be less blatant here and instead provide something concrete as a basis of discussion ?
” He is totally consumed by self seeking gibberish.”
Uh-oh, never mind. You have already judged Chomsky.
- Mahesh.
[Reply]