Dateline Pakistan



I have known Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States Hussain Haqqani since 1991-92 when he was spokesperson and special assistant to Nawaz Sharif. He performed similar duties for Benazir Bhutto when she replaced Sharif as Prime Minister after the 1993 polls. The first PM he served was Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi.

An erudite man who writes beautifully in English and is equally well versed in Urdu poetry, Haqqani has had his share of controversies in a career that also took him on a diplomatic assignment to Sri Lanka. He succeeded Gen. (Retd) Mahmud Ali Durrani (who returned home last year to briefly serve as national security advisor) as Pak envoy to the US where he had lived in exile during Musharraf’s regime.

Husain Haqqani

Husain Haqqani

Haqqani isn’t as much a subject of this blog. What has brought him in news is his defense of two US journalists blacklisted by Islamabad. He took issue with his government on being approached by top executives of news channels represented by journalists on the exit list: CNN and NBC.

A former journalist and contributor to leading international publications, Haqqani feels Islamabad can ill-afford the controversy while Washington debates clearing a USD 1.5 billion per annum non-military aid to Pakistan.

The envoy has promoted his country’s interest by holding brief for the US scribes. But he has raised in the process a bigger question: If Americans could be so browbeaten, what to talk of Indian scribes in Pakistan and their counterparts in India? I’ve myself suffered long, anxious waits for renewal of resident permit or visa while serving in Pakistan between 1991-94 and am aware of similar problems Pakistani journalists have had in India.

So pernicious can be the Indo-Pak visa regime that correspondents from either country often find themselves in captivity at their place of posting with no visa but only the promise of an extension. It happened to me in 1993 when I couldn’t— for want of timely visa renewal— travel to Delhi for the death anniversary of my father who had died the previous year.

I returned home for good after the failed 1994 foreign secretary level talks; two other Indian scribes similarly denied visas over the next few months. A Pakistani journalist’s experience last year was equally bitter.

His wife and two sons were stranded in India and couldn’t join work and college back home on time for want of visa that came too late. The result: loss of fees and an academic year for one of his sons.

More recently, an Indian journalist in Pakistan faced the ire of secret agencies. The matter was resolved— but only when President Zardari played the Good Samaritan at the urging of some senior Pakistani journalists.

Amid such intolerance and distrust, one can only hope that the establishments on ether side will some day recognize the futility of it all. Till that happens, I can only recollect what I told Pak Interior Minister Naseerullah Babar before leaving Islamabad in 1994: media relations are much too serious a matter to be left to intelligence organizations given to treating journalists as undercover agents! The Minister heard in silence as I said: “Aney wali naslen aapako eis bhool key liye maaf nahin karengi….” The PPP’s back in power in Pakistan and so is the hounding of the foreign media. Difficult to say whether it reflects the establishment’s distrust of the ruling dispensation or that of the guest scribes.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 3.8 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://www.indiaandbharat.blogspot.com Shah Alam Khan

    Dear Mr. Sharma,
    Thanks for yet another thought rousing article from your pen. Well the denial of visas to foreign journalists would come naturally to Pakistani diictators but hanging on to this practice by a democratically elected goernment is a matter of concern. I presume it goes on to show the poor implantation of the seeds of democratic rights and freedom of speech in that country. Journalism is a direct measure of freedom within the civil society and unfortunately Pakistan needs to work hard on this record. How ironical that Faiz could write the following lines living in Pakistan:

    Bol ki lab aazaad hai.n tere
    bol zabaan ab tak terii hai

    Teraa sutawaan jism hai teraa
    bol ki jaan ab tak terii hai

    Bol ki sach zindaa hai ab tak
    bol jo kuchh kahane hai kah le

    Truly,
    Dr.Shah Alam Khan
    AIIMS, New Delhi
    Read my blog at: http://www.indiaandbharat.blogspot.com

    [Reply]

  • http://thetrajectory.com thetrajectory

    I am a regular follower of your blog. I am writing a research paper on interactions across the India-Pakistan border through the blogging community. Since your write about India and Pakistan in your blog, is there anything of particular interest that you would want to share. I mean are the responses to India-Pakistan specific posts rational or nationalist? Are you accused of taking sides? Are there any blogs by authors on either sides dealing with India-Pakistan relations that you find interesting? And finally what according to you is the role of the blogging community in defining India-Pakistan relations?
    I would appreciate if you can share your responses. You can mail your response to thetrajectory@gmail.com
    Thanks

    [Reply]

  • vinod

    I think it is the intelligence culture bequeathed by Gen. Zia.

    [Reply]

  • (Dr.) B.N.Anand

    Dear Vinod Sharma ji

    I recently had a chance to go through the book, “DATELINE ISLAMABAD” by Amit Baruah. He was a correspondetn of “HINDU” in Islamabad for some time. He describes how the Indian scribes are always tailed by the Pakistani intelligence on a motor cycle. It became so obvious when he was cycling and the man behind on following him on a matorbike at the speed lesser than that the speed with which he was cycling. That was just one of the many tales of harrassment he mentioned while on job in that country. You must have undergone the same type of torture while you were there. I am amzed you still advocate for any hope of friendship with that country. Yes, the situation may be a different when one considers relations between the citizens of the two countries on personal level. But given a chance, the same citizen will start speaking different language vis-a-vis our country if that gentleman becomes a part of ruling apparatus in that country. I cite the case of Mr.Mushahid Hussein who as a journalist was always nice but once he became the Information and Broadcasting minister of that country , his langauge changed and it was as acidic as it could be of any other politician of that country.

    We migrated from the NWFP areas in 1947(to be precise, it was Kohat) and I wished to go at least once to see my birthplace. As I also often go to USA for my academic assignments, some people who matter advised me against doing so. As once my paasport was stamped for having visited Pakistan, my future chances of going to USA will totally recede. That really discouraged me. But it also brought out the general percept of the dangers of having friendship with an almost “failed” state”.
    The history of our relationship with that country always shows that we have always been cheated by that country under the guise of friendship. Besides 1947, 1965 and 1971 wars,Kargil and 26/11 Mumbai are the most prominent examples.

    However all these events do not seem to have discouraged you. May be you are too convinced or rather obsessed with the belief that friendship with Pakistan is possible. But I beg to differ with you. We can have just normal relationship without involving any emotional element in it and without lighting any candles at the borders. Just like we have a working relationship with China.
    However , it is always a treat to read your articels, though we may not agree on our appraoch to dealing with Pakistan.
    Regards
    (Dr.) B.N.Anand

    [Reply]

    Nikhil Reply:

    Dr. Anand,

    I concur with your views. I prefer a plain business like relationship with our neighbor in the West; the way we are now having with China, Russia or the US.

    [Reply]

  • (Dr.) B.N.Anand

    Dear Vind Sharma ji
    I just posted my comments. On rechecking it, I found some typing errors in words like “articles”

    “amazed”. There may be a few more. But these were all inadvertent. I regret for these errors.

    BN Anand

    [Reply]

  • vinod

    Dear Dr Anand,
    I hadn’t gone to Pakistan with any illusion or false hope. I don’t believe in recalling the problems I faced during my stay there for that’s a given in a conflict situation and very much a hazard of our profession.
    In seeking peace with Pakistan I am being true to my belief that belligerence against that country will help fundamental forces on either side whose objective is to see India deviate from its secular path to become a Hindu theocracy. And a theocratic India will provide justification for the two-nation theory we negated by declaring ourselves a non-denominational secular state after the Partition.

    [Reply]

    Nikhil Reply:

    Dear Vinod,

    I think you’re mistaken. Both the BJP and the Congress have demonstrated their deep desire for peace with Pakistan by taking bold initiatives. The people of India have also rallied behind such moves with the hope to end terrorism. I wonder what belligerence towards that country have we displayed in the last decade or more.

    Neither do I see any cause of alarm for India becoming theocratic. The prospect of Theocratic India will never be a reality, it never was; despite what some journalists or politicians would like to believe. Only when the uber-liberals, wedded to their idealogy, go on an overdrive to villify the majority in this country, the hard-liners get emboldened; not otherwise. Let India go through its ups and downs without the baggage of history of the two-nation theory. We never signed up to make our neighbors to be more sane, did we?

    [Reply]

    Sam Reply:

    Between neigbhors, there can be many levels of relations.

    So why can’t we be just indifferent neighbors, without frienship, without trade and a big “without interference”.

    We tried being friendly, just business…nothing to seem to work.

    So just cutoff everything.

    Basically there is aggression in Islam and Muslims.
    Since 7th century Bin Qasim, violent invaders always came from west to india.

    So just build a “chinese wall” and move on…
    maybe that will work.

    [Reply]

    (Dr.) B.N.Anand Reply:

    Dear Vinod Sharma ji
    Yes, You have a point and I agree that we do not have to be the proponent of two-nation theory. But it is difficult for an Islamic state to remain peaceful with a neighbouring secular one, especially when the secular state has as much population of Muslims as the population of the neighbouring Islamic state. The sole agenda of Islamic state is “Jihad” which they attribute to be a part of their religion. So the secular state faces “Jihad” not only from our neighbour but also from some (may be a fraction) of our own coutrymen. We should not forget that it were only the ten terrorists which held the whole Mumbai under siege for three days. When ten armed motivated people can cause so much carnage, the fraction of our that population can become their easy collaborators. That is what happened on 26/11.
    Please tone down your extra enthusiasm for friendship with our Islamic neighbour. Yes, we should have just normal relations with out any fanfare or hype for anything extra.
    Anyway thanks for your time for listening and responding
    Regards
    (Dr.) B.N.Anand

    [Reply]

    Sam Reply:

    Why should we be friends ?

    Before that, let us try to be to be indifferent neighbors.

    India can has the genetic make up to take that role.

    Pakistan cannot do that, due to islam, 2 nation theory, arab invaders…
    they see their role as islamifiying the whole india.

    so they are not even capable of that non-interfering role.

    So it is stupid for india, to keep asking for friendship and getting backstabbed all the time.

    Show me a single time, Muslim rules or kings or their heroes kept their hands off other people (especially when they are in power).

    Imagine the opposite of India’s size and pakistan.
    Pakistan is 8 times bigger than India.
    They will be drunk with power and will wage a never ending wars until they get all Hindus forcefully converted.

    The question for Indians is,, there should be a poll across the whole nation.
    Q1. Is India better off with or without partition ?
    Q2. Is India better off with or without Muslims ?

    Only after these, they should even try to have any relations with Pakistan.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.solar-panels-shop.com/ Solar Panel

    Whoa, good post. I just found your blog and I’m already a fan. 8)

    [Reply]

  • Himalayagarden

    soldiering is not only a job but a life style. before stopping recruitment then government must create alternatives of employment and be able to offer just as good alternatives as both IG and BG. these soldiers, like hundreds of thousand of other nepalis have left nepal to work abroad as there is a lack of work, less possibilities, a wage not sufficinet to live on and many other reasons, government should firstly improve the conditions and possibilities of work at home beofre closing avenues and good possibilities abroad….
    colonialism….is not to serve the Indians or British but nepals largest threath is from her own politicians being corrupt, greedy and not serving the people….

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1607350817 Chris Brammer

    Sad that some should think the elimination of The Gurkha Regiment is a test of the new Republic. As usual the politicians have it wrong and are trying to make a name for themselves. It is more an indication of their lack of confidence. The British Army supports the brave and valuable traditions of the proud and noble people of Nepal.

    [Reply]

  • arani

    What ever happened to Anu Kottoor? she was as big and famous as Mehr Jessia and Madhu Sapre

    [Reply]

  • daphne

    hey guys check out this University of Nigeria website, http://www.unn.edu.ng

    [Reply]