Hindustan Times
Mehsud’s death will remain a mystery
Is Baitullah Mehsud’s a case of a dead man telling no tales? Could well be if he’s really no more. The haze around what happened at Zangarha, where the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan chief was reportedly blown up in a US drone attack, only shows that getting at the truth is always a big challenge in Pakistan where intelligence organizations are a law unto themselves.
If the hellfire shots that took out the Tehrik-e-Taliban leader were triggered by a Pakistani tip-off, the reality shall forever remain buried under the wrecked house of his in-laws.
Why? Well, overtly the civil-politico-military establishment has been crying hoarse over the violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty in the North West by the American air incursions targeting Al Qaida and its Taliban supporters. They are at their wits’ end whether to welcome or protest the attack, the target this time being a man whose suicide bombers had left thousands of innocent Pakistanis dead across the country’s four provinces. By the establishment’s own admission, the TTP leader was Pakistan’s enemy number 1.
His hand was suspected in Benazir Bhutto’s assassination—currently under a UN probe— and a string of bombings in Islamabad, Lahore, Peshawar and elsewhere. At one stage, he was even accused of acting at the behest of Pakistan and India.
Any official admission or confirmation of his death in the drone attack would give the lie to accusations of his links with India and the US. At another level, it would bestow upon the dreaded killer a martyr’s hallow he doesn’t deserve. The US involvement in the region is the subject of hugely partisan debate that cannot ever lead to a consensus, regardless of Mehsud’s actions and assaults on the Pakistani State.
Those willing to accept as “necessary evil’ the American intervention in areas bordering Afghanistan, where governmental writ is non-existent, are still in a minority, their voices getting drowned in popular, nationalist fervour.
The world therefore will never get to know as to what really happened to Mehsud, his wife and in-laws. Pakistanis are still awaiting a word on who killed Benazir or for that matter even the 1988 midair explosion that rid Pakistan of the scourge called Zia-ul-Haq.
Before signing off, I reproduce my impressions of a famous Peshawar street I had penned some years ago during the Indo-Pak friendship cricket series.
Story tellers’ street
In Peshawar, there’s a storytellers’ street, the Kissa Khawani Bazaar, where professional storytellers would once narrate tales of war and love to throngs of traders, soldiers and tribesmen. Nick-named the ‘Piccadilly of Central Asia’, it was home also to Prithviraj Kapoor, whose family migrated to Mumbai to trade memorable tales in Bollywood’s celluloid bazaar.
As India played Pakistan at Arbab Niaz Stadium, I was reminded of my 1993 visit to the Kapoor Khandaan’s ancestral haveli in one of the many bylanes behind Kissa Khawani’s Kahwa-shops decorated with large brass samovars, teapots and teacups. The men who sold Kissas (stories) over cups of tea had long vanished. But romance lingered at high noon in the bazaar’s cool, tree-lined ambience so appropriately captured by a local bard: Kissa Khawani dey bazaar ajab lehar hondey hai, thandi thar iddey tikhad dopahar hondey hai. My own bag of stories from Pakistan has to it an assortment of human encounters. It’s a mix of the good and the bad, the foremost among them being the one related to me by the great Lata Mangeshkar.
The Lata story figures high on my list for it tells so much about the rivalry between the sub continental neighbours. At a reception for the team which toured Pakistan in the early Eighties, the then BCCI Chief, N.K.P. Salve, walked Sunil Gavaskar up to Mallika-e-Tarannum Noorjehan: “Have you met the great Sunil Gavaskar?” Barely had Salve turned to Sunny than the lady, known for her myriad moods, declared: “No, Imran (Khan) is the only cricketer I know. “
“Oh!” muttered Salve. “But Sunny, you must have heard of Noorjehan….” Never one to let snobbery go unpunished, Gavaskar was quick to dispatch the Noorjehan googly to where it belonged: “No, the only singer I’ve heard of is Lata Mangeshkar.”
A decade later, Gavaskar, whom the Melody Queen couldn’t or didn’t recognize, was hailed across Pakistan for having wagered on Imran Khan’s squad despite its early defeats in the 1992 World Cup. One wonders whether Noorjehan was invited. But Sunny was the guest of honour at a tea party the then Pakistan Premier, Nawaz Sharif, hosted for Imran’s boys.
The spectacle now on display in Pakistan isn’t just cricket. It’s a Maha Kumbh that took almost 15 years to happen. From Lahore, the Indians have traveled through Karachi, Rawalpindi and Peshawar without a stone being pelted or a Pepsi bottle tossed on the ground. Quite obviously, popular mood is changing in Pakistan. It’s a dialogue of a different kind, a dialogue denied over the last five decades.
The series has also done a lot of good to Pakistan, whose best-known satirist, Ibne Insha, once wrote about his encounter with an angry young man who demanded to know as to where the need was to seek a separate homeland for Muslims if people were to behave as Sindhis, Punjabis, Pakhtoons and Baluchis. “I told him, maaf keejiye, galti ho gayi, aage se nahin banayenge.”
Insha died in 1978. Had he lived, he’d have been a happy man seeing his countrymen finding a catharsis in Indo-Pak cricket.
(5 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ...Posted by Vinod Sharma on Monday, August 10, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Filed under Uncategorized · Tagged Baitullah Mehsud, Benazir Bhutto’s assassination, Kissa Khawani Bazaar, Mallika-e-Tarannum Noorjehan, Tehrik-e-Taliban, US drone attack, Zia-ul-Haq
Brilliant article, especially loved reading about the Sunny-Noor Jehan encounter!
[Reply]
Well i guess there will be lots of other mehsuds if this one goes. We have to ready for the next one. Maybe this fellow was getting to big for the shoes or held too many secrets for the pakistani establishment and had to be bumped off. IT might also be that Uncle Sams next cheque is due and some head was in order. And what about the LeT and the dawoods ?
[Reply]
Dear Mr. Sharma,
Very well said indeed! How ironical is the helplessness of the Pakistani intelligence agencies in confirming or refuting the death of a terrorist, a man known to have master minded the killing of a popular leader of their country. It goes on to show the consequences of raring a tiger. But honestly will the confirmation of his death bring relief if not joy to a million hearts? I don’t think so. He represented a thought practice not a one man army. His death may be a blow to the infrastructure of hate in Pakistan but surely it’s not an end to the process of hate.
In fact if I would quote Ibne Insha and say, “yeh batein jhooti batein hain, yeh logo ne phelaiye hein; Tum Insha ji ka naam na lo, kya Insha ji saudayi hein?”
Keep writing for the process of peace….as you have always being doing.
Truly,
Dr. Shah Alam Khan
AIIMS, New Delhi
[Reply]
vinod Reply:
August 11th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
Thanx doc. Am really fascinated by some of your posts on this blog. U too keep up the spirit and the good work.
[Reply]
Was he killed to hide some truths about Benazir’s murder?
[Reply]
Usman Chaudhry Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 10:51 am
No. He was involved in master minding number of suicidal bombings on administration & military institutions, hotels, intelligence & police centers. He openly denied his hand in Benazir’s assasination but claimed all suicidal bombings. The government believes him to be the culprit but he refused having any connection in BB’s murder.
[Reply]
vinod Reply:
August 13th, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Yes of course one Mehsud will be replaced by another perhaps more ruthless man. But there are doubts whether the successor will command the same kind of hold over various disparate militant groups.
[Reply]
Dear vinod,
Pakistanis would never know about the killer of Benazir as we are still wondering who killed Liaqat ali khan (First PM of Pakistan) and Army chief and then president of Pakistan Zia ul haq. Its a great tragedy with Pakistanis.
[Reply]
vinod Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Yes indeed Kara Sahib. Leave alone punshing the killers, people are even denied the knowledge as to who ordered or carried out the dartardly murder of a hugely popular leader like Benazir. As for Zia, he died by what he lived— the sword he always pointed at things any civil society deserves.
[Reply]
kara Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 3:05 pm
Vinod you are right in a sense , that majority of people know who is involved with whom in the conspiracy of Benazir’s murder but we can not say it openly. And it is known fact vinod that CIA likes to play dirty where ever it wants to. You are a very learned and seasoned journalist and I believe you have the first hand knowledge about all these political stunts in World arena. I am sure you don’t need any proof for the hand of CIA in all these dirty killings in south asia.
[Reply]
Amit Reply:
August 14th, 2009 at 3:35 am
I guess we can blame CIA for swine flu too, or at the very least, I know for sure that the agency is responsible for my upset stomach.
Do we know who killed JFK or Robert Kennedy?
[Reply]
vinod Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
No. But we know who killed, Mahatma Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi or Indira. Two wrongs do not make a right. The lack of an honest probe into Benazir’s killing is the issue.
[Reply]
Usman Chaudhry Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
CIA is blamed for JFK’s killing. Ghandhi’s, Bhutto’s, Kenedy’s all seem to have same patterns.
In Pakistan intellectuals blame CIA for BB’s assassination. Apparently this might not sound or look so but because of her deep involvement with military intelligence and aggregating situation of terrorism in Pakistan it is very much believed she knew the undercover purpose of west. Something which a good political voice can challange unlike military dictatorship rule.
[Reply]
Rajeev Reply:
August 12th, 2009 at 7:49 pm
If one murder mystery is unsolved, it doesn’t mean all other murder mystries must not be solved.
[Reply]
Mehsud died so wht there are 100 of mehsud in their team n among them 1 will be declared as successor of Mehsud .Talibani’s excersise may get slow for while but it will keep on going N who knows this sucessor may “perform ” better than Mehsud .
In BB’s case its not diffcult to find if Govt wants they can get to the root………………but yes “If”
it seems as if govt also taking advantage of Taliban’s name
rgds
[Reply]
A very enjoyable piece by you. I always admire your deep knowledge and story telling skills. The one involving Noor-Jahan and Sunil Gavaskar is a treat to read. Gavaskar as always took sweet revenge.
Mystery regarding Mehsood’s death is mounting. Everybody wanted to know from him motive behind assissination of Benazir Bhutto. With his death it will be very hard to know the fact now.
[Reply]
vinod Reply:
August 14th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
Finding the motive for Benazir’s assassination is not difficult. She was removed from the scene as she alone had the commanding presence on the Pak political landscape to change the mindsets that guided the supporters of the Taliban and the Al Qaeda.
[Reply]
I hope Baitullah is alive. He is giving Pak a taste of its own medicine
[Reply]
If you connect the dots, it will be obvious that he was killed by a US predator (or reaper) strike. The ground intelligence was provided by thye pakistanis.
In fact toady in the DAwn newspaper, there is a news article to the effect that 99% of predator strikes in pakistan have the covert nod of the pakistanis.
[Reply]