India on a Chongqing bus



“How is Shah Rukh Khan doing?” asked Paul Zhang.

At 9 pm, the locked doors of the Agape Church opened and a crowd of twenty-something Chongqing residents with backpacks and guitars streamed out to chat on the dimly-lit pavement.

From the outside, the church looks like an office building. The newcomer in the group is a student member of the Communist Party of China. The medical student introduced himself by his English name, Forever. We were in Chongqing, the southwest sprawl on the Yangtze, with a population as big as Mumbai plus Kolkata. It is the largest municipality on the planet, a cluster of districts including 40 counties under central administration.

“In the future, you will see Shanghai in the east and Chongqing in the west,” said Zhou Bo, a propaganda official. For now, the metropolis is still laidback. In the sweltering afternoon when temperatures hit 39 degrees, the city goes to sleep. Chongqing is better-known for the iron fisted rule of its top official Bo Xilai, who has sent over 4,000 criminals into jail and ordered the singing of Mao-era red songs in public places, than for its new Chongqing-Antwerp freight train transporting thousands of laptops.

I opted out of the Yangtze cruise to see the Chongqing nightlife and decided to wander on foot, subway, a taxi reeking of tobacco and by bus to glimpse a slice of student life in this nationalist wartime capital of China. During the entire evening, I never spotted another Indian. Forever met me at the Hilton, which was last year downgraded after a raid on ‘prostitution and gang activities’, making it perhaps the world’s lowest priced Hilton.

We walked to the Lianglukou entrance of the new Chongqing subway. The maps were entirely in Chinese so I needed an attendant’s help to buy a ticket to the station closest to the church. “Careful. Risk of hand pinching,’’ warned a signboard.

The subway, one of the latest transport projects in 20 cities across China, was surprisingly empty considering the population of Chongqing. As we poured out of the station into the basement of a high-rise mall, Forever said just one thing. “Wow.” I wondered where were all the people in the most populous city, because the mall like the subway station, was near empty.

We waited on the pavement for the church doors to open. I was told this is where more and more children of atheist Chinese parents are coming in search of spiritual solace, often against their parents’ wishes. They sing hymns, discuss the Bible and practise English with foreigners. Personal challenges typical to modern Chinese life including job pressures and rising property prices that delay marriage prospects come up in the discussions.

Paul, who spent a year working as an interpreter in India, said he was baptised this summer, much to his parents’ consternation. “Jesus found me,” he said.

Jacky, an English schoolteacher, learnt to read the Bible while studying English in university. “I feel inner peace when I am inside the church,” he said. This group says it believes in state authority. Chongqing has a separate set of believers who congregate in underground house churches.

We strolled past the church to the liberation monument, first built to commemorate Sun Yat Sen. The wooden tower is circled by luxury storefronts, pedestrians out for evening walks and ‘bang bang’ men, who earn a living carrying shopping bags on bamboo poles, sleeping on the pavements.

I asked the students about the nightspots I Googled — a singles bar called True Love and Pirates Pub — and heard that both were shutdown.

So I hopped aboard Bus number 405. A stock broker returning home from an ‘English corner’ where locals gather to hone their conversation skills, began chatting about how his city changes by the month and taxi drivers who return from annual holidays get lost in the maze of new landmarks.

I wanted to ask him more questions about Chongqing. But the man became insistent to talk about India. “Aren’t you going to ask me about India?’’ he demanded.

As my bus stop neared and the lights were switched on, the man had his say in a rush. “I don’t want to put a hammer on your heart,’’ he said in English. “But we want India to be prosperous and developed. So that Indians will stop thinking about war.’’

For more comments on India in Chongqing, see this.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 4.78 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Jai Khosla

    This blog lacks depth. It should be cancelled. The blog owner is above her head and should look for another job.

    [Reply]

  • wei

    Here are some photos for different areas of Chongqing:
    http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1334377

    [Reply]

  • http://tinyurl.com/cirailway CIRailway

    Please join our petition for a railway between China and India!

    [Reply]

  • Ramesh Talwani

    PAWAR DESERVES BETTER THAN BEING SLAPPED.
    AFTER ALL ONLY POLITICIANS HAVE A RIGHT TO HIT PEOPLE. EVEN INNOCENT PROTESTERS.
    SUNITA WAS SLEEPING WHEN TWO BRAVE CENTRAL MINISTERS ALONG WITH PRAMOD TEWARI AND POLICE WERE HITTING ,KICKING A PERSON SHOWING BLACK FLAG ONLY .WHY SUNITA REMAINED SILENT IS KNOWN TO ALL ON THAT ISSUE. WHY THOSE MINISTERS ARE ROAMING FREE.
    THAT REMINDS ME THAT FAMOUS LINE “IN DEMOCRACY ALL ARE EQUAL,SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS.”
    PAWAR HAS A VERY COWARDLY PAST.
    PARLIAMENT DISCUSSING THIS INCUDENT AND WASTING TIME IS HIGHLY REGRETTABLE.

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    Throwing a boot at George Bush and missing him was a great form of offensive protest – the boot-thrower achieved the intended results without physically hitting the target. Hurling a boot at George Bush in itself generated more sympathy for Iraq’s cause worldwide than it would have had the boot hit its target. Harvinder, being crass, missed this fine point – throw a shoe, slipper, chappal or even a punch – BUT NEVER HIT THE TARGET. For as soon as the protester hits his/her target, he/she misses the goal of achieving unadulterated, undivided and wholesome sympathy and attention for his/her cause. Pawar is a very senior politician who commands great respect; also he is cancer-sticken and that demands care definitely – slapping Pawar had only belittled Harvinder and had completely defeated his cause.

    [Reply]

  • Sharma_r81

    It is so sad. The dream team of Manmohan Singh, Montek Ahluwalia, Pranab Mukherjee and earlier Chidambaram have done very little for the economy. If we look carefully, all companies are suffering. Major projects which were supposed to be executed in the PPP mode are now floundering. God save India.

    [Reply]

  • Jake

    Why not anymore update?

    [Reply]

  • Ganesh

    Mr Ravi,

    Compliments on putting the spotlight on the very typical and now well known RSS game of back seat driving this great country’s politics.

    They are R S S – Rumour Spreading Society – and this title was given to them by none other than the right hand man of Advani today – Sharad Yadav- way back in the seventies.

    The middle class of this country – huge sections of it – loves to hate the Gandhi family.Yet they keep coming back to power.Why ? Because the middle class of this country is politically irrelevant.They do not contribute to any political discourse in a meaningful manner.

    They just work up rubbish like Sonia being an ex – maid etc ( a non issue when Supreme Court of India has already clearly spelt out legal position vis a vis her belonging to India – legally and constitutionally )

    In fact,she speaks Hindi ( when Jayalalitha does not even make an effort to learn ) she has spent the worst time of her life with her family and has faced all tragedies gracefully.

    She has been one of the finest BAHU s if that is a validation for so called Hindu sanskars.She has been a great mother apart from being a loving wife.

    She never reacts or hits back at these idiotic stupid falsehood based rantings of these middle class dumbos because they should be left where they deserve to be – rendered irrelevant and sent to trash bin.

    UPA II has been a tragic story of Congress behaving as a hurt housewife rather than a party that is supposed to show leadership.Opposition ( including the socalled Team Anna ) have got away with rumour mongering,astronomical figures which have no confirmed basis and mindless ranting only because THEY HAVE NOT BEEN COUNTERED.

    UPA II has not been such a disaster.Time has come to hit back with decisions,focussed leadership and visiblizing performance ( instead of behaving HURT or GUILTY ),

    UPA still remains the only relevant coalition.

    What bothers me is NAZI type thinking of these RSS apologists online.Either agree with them or run the risk of being called mad insane dalaal what not and what not.

    Can there be any better indication of a frustrated bunch of individuals who know while we may love or hate UPA II but there is indeed NO ALTERNATIVE right now.

    Instead of venting your diseased spleens on UPA II,my advice to these RSS rumour mongers is SET YOUR OWN RIGHT.That sure is one way to get back to power.

    [Reply]

    Ravi Reply:

    Ganesh
    100% agree with you.

    [Reply]

  • pankaj#1

    Agree with you Dr. Sharma.

    [Reply]

  • abhi

    ho ho ho….tells a lot about the candidate who is supported by muslims……for sure obama is a low grade president and bad deal for america

    [Reply]

  • suraj

    Muslim votes do not matter in US elections. Muslims are the most communal people on earth.

    [Reply]

  • singhisking

    True…because both r useless!!

    [Reply]

  • Faulitics

    Zia seems to be encouraging block voting and block thinking on communal basis even in the US among Muslims living there. Muslim voters don’t matter in the US. That’s the reason many candidates openly criticize Islamist ideology because they do not fear any electoral consequences because of backlash from muslim voting block. This may change in the future but not anytime soon. But that’s not the case in UK where all the local white politicians stay silent on the Islamist ideology practiced by many Muslims especially Pakistanis there.

    [Reply]

  • vijay kumar

    I wish Zia had written an article on how ALL minorities ranked the two Presidential candidates.

    To talk about only Muslims would be to promote a mindset which has kept them behind in India. The next logical step in this sort of argument wold be to talk about which candidate would support a separate personal law.

    [Reply]

  • Plumbline

    John 3:16-18……

    16 “For God loved the world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 God sent his Son into the world not to judge the world, but to save the world through him.
    18 “There is no judgment against anyone who believes in him. But anyone who does not believe in him has already been judged for not believing in God’s one and only Son……….

    [Reply]

  • engrich