Chopstick smiles



They train to smile with chopsticks wedged between their teeth and books balanced on their heads. They must be nearly as tall as the Miss China beauty contestants and produce smiles outlasting any beauty contest: 4 hours and 48 minutes aboard the new train from China’s capital to coast.

The 313 attendants on the 1,318-km Beijing-Shanghai bullet train launched last week have earned the online nickname ‘high-speed sisters’ for their charm offensive. The glimpses of smile training sessions reported in the media served to divert some of the public attention away from the high ticket prices and corruption and safety scandals in China’s railroad expansion.

The pretty army carries forward the Chinese economy’s official obsession with hostesses between 19-22 years who can smile showing only six to eight front teeth. They are now an anticipated fixture in every national project starting from the Beijing Olympics to the Harmony trains launched ahead of the 90th anniversary of the Communist Party.

“Crew members must be female, younger than 28 years, be of fair complexion and have a shapely figure that conforms to selection standards,” according to the China Daily. “The crew must be able to converse in English and know all about the train. They must weigh less than 60 kg and be 165-170 cm tall.”

For pictures of the chopstick smiles, see this.

I was aboard the train, traveling ticket-less on a government-organised test run last Monday, read article.

The second-class compartment (555 yuan or Rs 3,885) had narrow blue seats ideal only for weight-conscious passengers. There was a charging point for my laptop and soon there will be wi-fi. The restroom had full-length mirrors and more space than an airline loo. Ahead in the first-class compartment, seats were wider and fitted with reading lamps. The red leather reclining business class seats cost more than an airline ticket with prices fixed at 1,750 yuan (Rs 12,250).

Perhaps frazzled by the railway officials and foreign camera crews roaming the length of the train last Monday, the high-speed sisters began to look nervous and tired after pushing heavy trolleys laden with KFC breakfast bags and later, chicken curry and shrimp lunch boxes. The attendants I spoke to couldn’t converse in English and kept forgetting to bring anything I requested.

The bullet train has world-class technology and Chinese-style service. When I needed a glass of water, I got a choice of green tea or boiling water. The food selection was meaty except for little plastic bowls containing cherries, tomatoes and grapes. I had remembered to put a bread roll in my hand bag when I dashed out of my apartment at 6.30 am, but I was still hungry by lunch time. I requested an attendant to provide one of the packets of nuts that was distributed when I was away from my seat, interviewing an engineer. She forgot to smile or bring it, but she was kind enough to clear the shells left strewn all over my table by a passenger who enjoyed my window seat in my absence.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (9 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • shan

    @Reshma, Looks like Hindi Chini are indeed Bhai Bhai , in some matters

    [Reply]

  • ajay

    Reshma,

    Your heart is not really in China. you seems to find everything wrong about the place – why do you ask HT folks to send someone whi really enjoy their stay in China and not be so picky about minute details just to pick on problems

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/bappam Bappa Mukherjee

    Critics and detractors of the Anna Hazare movement like Ms. Nandan are displaying an unbelievable degree of petulance. Corruption has infested Indian politics and society at every level. At least, Team Anna has proposed a solution. You can disagree with it only if you offer an alternative. What have you done except nitpicking?

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Team Anna and people who support it are under the mistaken impression that once their version of Lok Pal Bill is passed – there will be no more corruption. How gullible people can be?

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    The first organization which spoke of 2 nations in un-divided India was the Hindu Mahasabha much before Jinnah took the idea up. Brush up your history buddy. 1857 Ghadar is the best example of Hindu-Muslim unity – after that the British took upon themselves to divide Hindus and Muslims to serve their interests. Pakistan was a place for Indian Muslims till the 50s. after 1965, Pakistan ceased to be an option for Indian Muslims. Saudi Arabia was never, I repeat, never a place for Indian Muslims to settle down. We bow before before the Kaaba, which happens to be geographically in Makkah, SA, but not before any political entity. Doubting the credentials of Indian Muslims has become very old practice of the RSS, that is why it is known as an anti India org’n. Muslims do value their identity wherever they are, and it is their survival instinct, nothing more and nothing less. Muslims are extremely patriotic – they are being demonized in the country to serve some interests, thats all. In Kargill, many more Indian Muslim soldiers sacrificed their lives for their country, much more than their proportion in the army – that is enough proof of their patriotism and love of the country. Extremists may go on beating their drums against Indian Muslims and Islam; they may achieve their limited goals, but when it comes to fighting for the country, Indian Muslims are the first in the firing line to face the enemy. By the way, China is knocking on the door – and only a united India would be able to face that enemy.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    You are wrong on the first sentence. The first person to see Hindus and Muslims as two separate nation was Syed Ahmed khan who established AMU.

    RSS/Mahasabha was a much later retaliatory movement.

    Till 1857, Hindus-Muslims faught together against Brits and Hindus being large hearted installed Bahaduyr Shah Zafar as King but muslims after 1858 decided to side with Brits under Syed Ahmed Khan.

    It was muslim league who picked up ideology of Syed Ahmed Khan and even before mahasabha was born the idea of pakistan was articulated by Mohammad Ali and then Iqbal.

    In 1946, 90% of muslims of undivide India voted for muslim league in support of pakistan.

    These are all historical facts. I am not saying that all muslims are responsible for partition. There were few greats like Ashfaque Ulla Khan but muslims marginalized such great patriots.

    Now muslims are trying to act clever and shifting the blame of partition on Hindus. The 33% of muslims killed 0.6 million hindus whereas 67% hindu-sikhs killed only 0.4 million muslims during partition.

    The reason why muslims don’t join armed forces in great numbers is that majority of them don’t want to fight fellow muslims i.e. pakistan.

    lastly you may be a patriot but majority in your community of opportunist patriots or downright traitors.

    [Reply]

  • Ramesh Talwani

    SUNITA ,NEHRU AND MOHAN DAS GANDHI GOT INDIA DIVIDED MUCH FASTER THAN THIS. WHY DONOT YOU READ , last days of british raj and mission with mountbatten.
    IT WAS DONE BY DRAWING A LINE ON MAP.
    HOW MANY PEOPLE GANDHI AND NEHRU GOT KILLED IN PROCESS.PL RESPOND.

    [Reply]

    Saron Reply:

    Then there is all the more reason to learn from history – two wrongs can’t make one right

    [Reply]

  • http://www.desibits.com/ Avinash

    The question is not whether there was violation of any provisions of the Constitution but still there are certain ethics, and established practices to think, discuss and then come to some conclusions after having taking into confidence some eminent personalities or at least the political parties. The way or in a haphazard manner the Bill was approved in the UP assembly the intentions of Mayawati are clear. Her eyes are focused on the forthcoming elections in the State in early months. If the provisions of the constitution not abused but for sure have not been respected either in a democratic manner it should have been done. There are certain ethics, certain established precedents but in politics who cares????????.

    The need of the hour is to have a national debate on such issues and there should be certain amendments made in the Constitution ensuring that the politicians with malafide intentions does not succeed.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    why is it that all HT writers/editors/journalists find everything wrong that non congress leaders does and right in whatever the most incompetent/corrupt and shameless party called congress does. 70 years of struggle makes division of UP/uttarakhand a good case ? Up being the most populous state still is most unmanageable state. It is still a candidate of further division. If it had come from Rahul Gandhi, every single writer of HT from Pankaj Vora to Vinod Sharma would be clapping and saying wah wah kya idea hai!!!

    [Reply]

    Kunal Reply:

    that’s cause HT is Congress propaganda newspaper. it is not impartial or objective…if you want to read good analysis read DNA or The Hindu. I come here to see the reaction in the commentary section.

    [Reply]

    Saron Reply:

    Sorry Rohit — there should be proper ground work and homework before taking such major decisions. They are not done in a huff. Its not a question of non congress governments doing — but the haste in which it has been done

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Coming on the eve of elections to the state assembly, Mayawati has played her trump card of dividing the state into 4 parts in the hope that the people will forget all about her misgovernance of 5 years and accept the argument that UP has remained backward just because of its unmanageable size and Centre’s step-motherly treatment and that smaller manageable states will bring them more central funds and freedom from manipulations of leaders of richer regions or whatever.. It is a pity that the present day political leaders cover their governance sins by diverting people’s attention to issues that will further exacerbate their misery. It is a pure and simple election stunt. Hopefully,the people will see through her loaded game and vote for the candidates who are capable of pulling the state out of the economic and political morass it has fallen into because of the questionable activities of its socalled democratic rulers. How does she justify erecting her statues and amassing wealth disproportionate to the known sources of her income and reluctance to explain how the central funds were used..

    [Reply]

  • http://digitalblogindia.in/ Kunal

    The other smaller states like Jharkhand, Chattisgarh and Uttarakhand are not really doing that great even after separation. What makes one think that UP will do well after dividing into 4 smaller states ? It will just hog more money from the centre when that money could have been used elsewhere. It’s time the Gadgil formula be changed so that bigger states like Maharashtra gets it’s due share from the centre.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Read history first..It is not communalism but bare facts that you want to hide under the patronage of pro-muslim Congress.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Rana,
    But the fact remains muslims divided India. In west pakistan hindus-sikhs were reduced to 1% from 22%. In East paksitan i.e. BD, hindus were reduced to 8% from 28%.

    Pakistan was meant for south asian muslims but now India has as many muslims as pakistan. However muslims still claim that hindus are communal and muslims are victim.

    Ulta chor kotwal ko daantein.

    [Reply]

  • Anamika

    Going through some endings in my life as well…it’s good of you to have shared yours. Good to know that you can hold on while letting go.

    Thank you for sharing

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Hope the endings are not all sad, Anamika.

    [Reply]

  • Kushal

    Hug.

    [Reply]

  • Ag

    Isn’t it bothersome that we are so fawning over Pakistanis even after being kicked in the shin many many times? It is not a strength to be glorified, but a weakness to work on and eliminate.

    [Reply]

  • Ag

    You should check your logic. Vir Sanghvi’s views on the impact of strong Pakistan is not at odds with this piece.

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Being illogical is so much easier.

    [Reply]

  • RajX

    Indian society has this gift of spinning it’s weakness as a strength. Welcoming a leader of a country who have promised to bleed us with a thousand cuts is suicidal to say the least. Do people remember the Mumbai attacks, parliament attack, serial bombing carried out Dagwood “bhai” with Pakistani rdx

    We even spin our relationships with even our past colonizers. For example, we claim that we have a “historical” relationship with Iran. Strangely no one cares to expand on the nature of this “relationship” for a very good reason. This “relationship” is that of the one between a slave and a master.

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    Pakistan suffers from inferiority complex. The pygmies believe that they are the descendants of Chengiz Khan and can any day barge into India, forgetting the fact that we have defeated them in wars whenever they chose to attack us.
    Actually Pakistan is USA’s Israel for South Asia, to be used to terrorise the populace. It was carved out of India to keep a check on us, the communists China and the former USSR. Pakistan played its role out in dismantling of the USSR by helping the Afghans drive out the commies from Kabul. Now it is helping to put a check on India’s growth by sending terrorists time and again and by making us concentrate our troops in the western and northern sectors. Despite China’s help to that country, Pakistan harbours sympathisers of the rebels of Xinjiang Muslim province of China – the USA can any day decide to use these when it choses to. Pakistan is allowed to play in this area by the US and its allies as they stand to lose nothing. All that goes to prove that India is a very tolerant country – it is tolerating Pakistan as its neighbour with this much sagacity and forbearance!

    [Reply]

  • http://thepoliticalopportunist.blogspot.com/ abhishek sharma

    India needs Pakistan and Pakistan needs India to remain countries. Once there is no Kashmir issue, there will be no Pakistan and no India.

    [Reply]

  • Spitz

    To my mind, Pakistan does have wet dreams about having Kashmir, but it would be happy with an independent Kashmir, this would be a revenge for Bangladesh and cool their hearts.

    Further, with water crisis rising in the subcontinent, a non–Indian Kashmir has become a life or death issue for Pakistan.

    Have you guys ever put yourselves in their shoes and imagined what they feel?

    What will they achieve by having friendly thoughts about India? Their nation is destroyed, the least they can do before kicking the bucket is damage India as much as they can.

    Can an India feel genuine friendliness towards China? How can you feel friendly towards someone who has humiliated you in a war and who is a rival? How can Pakistan feel friendly towards India?

    We Indians want peace like maniacs, but just because we want peace we wont get it. It is not in our destiny to live in peace.

    This childish , retarded obsession to be friendly with Pakistan must stop. we should awake to realities of life and create our strategies accordingly.

    [Reply]

  • The Shaft

    Indian workers are heavily indebted to the leftists for whatever perks, benefits and rights they presently enjoy at the factory level. However, industrialization and corruption of the electoral system by higher castes politicians and bureaucrats have left little room for the leftist to maneuvre. On the other hand, you know what benefits and perks are enjoyed by the workers in the capitalist, neo-liberal USA? They are simply mind-boggling and a dream even today – that is why even the most committed marxist worker loves to find a placement in the USA. Can we have something like that happening in India?

    [Reply]

  • vijay !

    @ Zia

    Three days some anit nationals in the garb of Islam attacked the amar jawan jyoti at Azad Bhavan, attacked the media and the public. Two days back in a rally in Lucknow Muslims attacked the Buddhists because they felt Buddhists in Burma had killed Muslims.

    A hate campaign is on against the people of North East based on the perception that they are Budhhists ( being slant eyed)

    This blog is missing in action. Or is the purpose of the blog only to perpetuate victimhood mentality and never speak up when in the name of Islam, crimes against humanity are committed.

    I expected better from you.

    Why dont you write a piece condemning the criminals who destroyed the Amar jawan Jyoti, Why dont you expose the people who want Indian Muslims to hit at Buddhists in India because there are tensions in Burma?

    These guys never got agitated when hindus were driven from Kashmir.

    Condemn these anti-nationals. And Not a conditional condemnation — that becasue the Babri masjid was demolished these guys are justifed… or because it happened in Burma we need to condemn Burma first…

    [Reply]

  • Sumit Bose

    I fail to comprehend the selective outrage of the Muslims. When Muslims massacre Muslims ( Darfur, Iraq etc etc) the entire muslim world and the street-corner rabble-rousing mullas are suspiciously silent. When other communities react to the provocations of the muslims, the entire “ummah” suddenly erupts in loot/plunder mode.
    It was interesting to note that no SMSes were sent out in Gujarat, and in Gujarat no people of the North East, (who are there in large numbers) felt the insecurity to leave Gujarat.
    As if the tragedy was not not enough, our Indian government has reduced the sufferings of thousands to a comedy, accusing Pakistan for this all! Which translates, that the mobsters who terrorized the thousands to leave so many cities will face no force of the law catching upto them!

    [Reply]

  • Nilutpal

    well written zia…i agree with every line

    [Reply]

  • Plumbline

    John 3:15-18…….

    15 so that everyone who believes in him will have eternal
    life.

    16 “For God loved the
    world so much that he gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes
    in him will not perish but have eternal life. 17 God sent his Son into the
    world not to judge the world, but to save the world through him.

    18 “There is no
    judgment against anyone who believes in him. But anyone who does not believe in
    him has already been judged for not believing in God’s one and only Son.

    [Reply]

  • click the next document

    click the next document…

    Chopstick smiles : Middle Order…

  • wiki.axone.ru

    wiki.axone.ru…

    Chopstick smiles : Middle Order…

  • HTTP://wiki.thewaytoactuality.com/index.php?title=User_talk:EdithMosh

    HTTP://wiki.thewaytoactuality.com/index.php?title=User_talk:EdithMosh…

    Chopstick smiles : Middle Order…

  • simply click the following website page

    simply click the following website page…

    Chopstick smiles : Middle Order…