Reality check for TV channels



Is the TV boom over? It is certainly beginning to seem that way. In the English news space, only the Big Three (NDTV, Times and CNN-IBN) continue to rule the roost. Though Headlines Today has improved enormously, it has still to crash into the ranks of the Big Three. None of the new channels seem to have made an impact. And even then, I doubt if a single English news channel is making a profit. That’s why they are all cutting back, shedding staff and slashing salaries.

In the Hindi space, a virtual bloodbath is under way. Not one of the new channels that were launched in the last 18 months seems likely to survive. All of them are bleeding heavily and many have ceased operation.

Most interesting of all is the Hindi entertainment space. Two years ago, the conventional wisdom was that it was only a matter of time before Zee overtook Star Plus. Then, people began to say that we were heading for a situation where all the channels would have roughly the same share of a fragmented market with one being slightly ahead one week only to lose the top spot the following week. This hypothesis was altered again once Star convincingly beat off the threat from Zee. Now, people began to say that the top channels would continue to flourish and that there was no room for new entrants.

Over the last few months, even that view has been discarded. The spectacular success of Colours, which is now a serious threat to Star Plus, has demonstrated that there is always room for the right kind of new entrant.

On the other hand, it’s beginning to look as though there is no room for the wrong kind of entrant. Of the new channels, 9X has collapsed and Real has got off to a poor start. Real’s first week GRPs are significantly lower than the launch GRPs for any new channel, with the exception of 9X.

Sahara and Star One muddle along while Sony faces so much turmoil internally that it is hard to see it as a serious player in the months ahead. Even NDTV Imagine has not lived up to its early promise.

Of the proposed new launches, not one is likely to go ahead. Even Anil Ambani’s Big TV has put its plans on hold. Other software companies that spoke of entering the entertainment channel space have retreated.

What went wrong?

Well, my view is that many of these channels recognize that they had no hope of breaking even in the foreseeable future. They knew that the TV market was over-crowded. But it was the stock market that interested them. They believed they could float their companies, sell shares to a gullible public and cash out quickly.

The recession has ended that dream.

A fallback plan was to sell shares to a foreign entertainment company. Ever since Disney came in and bought channels from UTV, entertainment bosses have believed that all you need to do is to create a channel. Some foreigner will then come and buy it from you at a profit because all foreign companies want a piece of the Indian market.

Sadly, the foreign companies no longer have the money to buy out any Indian channels.

So, what happens next? More bankruptcies; more blood-letting; and more lay-offs, I fear. The future is bleak.

Two months ago, I ran into a fund manager I know on a Jet Airways flight. Did he regret his TV investments now, I asked.

Oh, absolutely, he said. Quite apart from the fact that he had invested in the wrong people, he had now come to the conclusion that TV was a bad investment.

So, he was out of media?

Not quite, he said. He was now looking at print, which was a much better investment.

So, who knows? Perhaps TV’s loss is print’s gain!

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (17 votes, average: 4.12 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://soumyajain.weebly.com/ Soumya Jain

    I think people are basically bored of television channels. Nobody is even interested to give a first glance to any new news channel at least. You are right – TV’s loss may result in print’s gain. At least I hope so…

    [Reply]

    Puneet Reply:

    I doubt that TV’s loss will be print’s gain. They cater to a different segments altogether. However, the recession has hit them hard.

    As you point out in your earlier blog: “….The media will take the biggest hit. And this year, that hit will be bigger because the last few years of spectacular growth led to increased advertising budgets and absurd media expansion. Many publishing houses ventured into businesses and products they had no understanding of, believing that the revenue from their existing cash cows would increase so dramatically that they could subsidize losses in the new businesses. That dream is now dead. That’s why some publications are closing down and others are certain to follow….”

    Having said that, I still feel there is a need for serious news and entertainment programmes. Most channels need to rethink their content strategy if they are to survive.

    And please, no more Reality TV, gaming shows, family sobs…oops! soaps I mean; and talent hunts!!

    [Reply]

    A.M.Rehan Reply:

    I belive that 24*7 news channel is not needed and not natural. it is very difficuilt to get the news every now and then, leave aside the breaking news. the pressure of getting more TRP or GRP has change the news channel to infotainment channel and lead to sensationalism and has damage severly the perception of 4th state of democracy.These fragmentation of channels into, GEC, sports, news, films etc is disgusting. I SUGGEST OLD PATTERN OF DOORSDARSHAN ERA was more natural.
    Sir we like to hear from u about the changing dynamics of journalism specially after the newschannel.

    [Reply]

    rahul sharma Reply:

    I don’t think that TV will lose out. These changes are mere upheavals towards a more stable setting. As a media TV is more effective than print. Only yesterday The New York Times carried the news of a popular newspaper shutting its print edition completely. I am sure its only a matter of time before the market bounces back and we will see the TV boom yet again. As for print media, I am a die hard fan, but news is so much more interesting when its spoonfed, isn’t it?

    Yatin Reply:

    HA HA HA HA this blog has reminded me of a great melody by the legendary Freddie Mercury and his band Queen which appealed radio ” SO stick around coz we might need you when we would be tired of all these visuals” . I still find print and radio better as sorce of E-E. And how could I forget those great AIR dayz back in hostel life. SO all we need is “RADIO-GA-GA”

    Rajesh Kumar Jha Reply:

    In a country like the size of India, any thing could be for a short while. So to say or think that the TV boom is over, will be jumping the gun. Of course, as you have rightly pointed out that only quality channels have survived the onslaught. So with your own logis taking a little further, if a good channel comes up in future, it will survive.

  • nithin

    It is true what you have said.During the boom so many channels were launched and the other HT carried an article in the print saying that there were around 300 odd news channels waiting for license.M not sure about the number but it was huge.There are so many channels offering the same thing that its of no use.Rather than foreigners coming and buying our people could join their 4 or 5 badly running programmes and make it as 1.Saves us the time of skipping channels and save them the ruins to pick up after their shattered channels.

    [Reply]

  • Dreamy Boy

    As an ordinary viewer with a slightly more interest in news, I can tell you that there is a limit to which news even I can digest. There is so much repetition and news is replaced by junk.

    As far as print is concerned, a friend of mine was a good reporter with a Hindi eveninger in Indore. After 15 years of good journalism, he was getting Rs 6,000. While any new manager with little knowledge about paper, was given 50,000 by the same owner. In those days he said how can the owner easily give these high salaries from a product of Re 1. My friend used to tell me how these managers make the papers bleed by convincing owners. I don’t know the truth but is it true in Delhi also?

    [Reply]

  • A S Rai

    I think that out of this bloodbath some serious and entertaining channels will emerge.I do not think TVs loss is going to be a gain for the print media,for both cater to different audience.My feeling is that as time goes along,TV news channel have a better option of surviving for their format is more in tune with natural tendency of human beings to talk and discuss.Reading is not an faculty with human beings are born with.

    [Reply]

    Anusha Reply:

    nice thing about Colours is the risk its taking, coming up with social issues, offering variety, different from the typical attire of popular channels.

    [Reply]

    D.R.GULATI Reply:

    With politicians providing all the ‘entertainment’,'action’,'breaking news’ and every thing else,who cares about the electronic media.The news channels being ‘cousins of Doordarshan’ ,there’s less of ‘news’, more of ‘one sided propaganda’. The day is not far off when each word spoken on TV would be sponsored.All ‘reality shows’ are similar and canned in an unreal way . Ads seem to be the ‘program’ ,others as ‘fillers’.What else is left to view?.This is my ‘reality check’.

    [Reply]

    Bhupesh Reply:

    I am totally agree with your view.But if you go through the contents of english news channel you will find that they are not corelating with the aam aasdmi.Most of the time they are crying about an incident which are not of any importance to common man.And if profit making is their only aim then we cann’t expect anything else.This is also a fact that most indians do not understand english that well so these channels are catering to metros only.whereas in the case of Hindi News Channels they are ridiculous.

  • Alok

    Well going by the way the print companies are performing your friend might be better off not investing there too. but then fund managers and PE guys are more led by herd mentality.

    [Reply]

  • http://linuxmemory.net Joannah

    I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

    Joannah

    http://linuxmemory.net

    [Reply]

    Suman Reply:

    9X collapse is not correct. It is the best news channel right now. Only news, no claptrap or silly opinion from dimwit bimbos etc etc

    [Reply]

    pooja mathur Reply:

    i totally agree with your view that the content is the true king. in my opinion colors became successful because it had totally new concept and at the same time they had researched well about contents the viewers would like to read.
    Expect for times now,cnn ibn and ndtv none of the channels seem to understand that people want to hear some serious news stuff.
    the channel real has been not doing well because the content is not up to the mark,
    when NDTV Imagine started it was a very good channel but it deteriorated.
    with the current problem of recession its better to put the plans on hold and its good that the co.s have realized this.

    [Reply]

  • ali

    I am all for new channels

    I completetely disagree that print will now gain from the current situation. Newspaper circulation will not go up because tv channels have become repetitive or boring. Thats a fallacious argument. Print always had its own place under the sun and it will continue to do so.Though no one can deny that apart from the analysis bit newspapers carry what tv channels have already carried the previous day.

    Television is in the “here and now” and there is no chance that anything will be able to compete with the televison medium in that respect. Not even the internet , where news websites update much after the story has gone on air. Lets face it whenever theres big news like mumbai 26/11, people will always tune in to the news channels. Have you ever seen anyone turning to newspaper or internet at such times?

    As regards, breaking into the big three of the news channels and slow sinking of new channels, I believe that most people actually keep switching channels in the news band as in, most people move up and down the news channels and stop at what interests them and that could be any channel even a new entrant.

    What i really mean to say is for an indian audience, channel loyalty is minimal…A person will stay with the channel only because it is delivering the goods, not just because it is NDTV,or Times now. Its a different matter that Times Now has consistently been delivering the goods. lI will give that to the channel.

    Its not like a person would have preferences for a channel in a way say he or she would have preferences for a mobile or a shoes brand. Have you ever heard anyone saying ndtv or times now is my brand in the same way as someone would say nokia or nike is! Basically in Tv , even while having a prefernce for one channel theres no exclusion of the others.However there could be programme loyalty. I can imagine someone watching “BIG fight” religiously or “face the nation” regularly.

    The “top three” is a myth, that breaks the moment another channel comes up with a unique and interesting programme and it could be any small insignificant channel breaking that myth. Aajtak broke it as a new entrant when against all convention it showed unedited footage of Gujarat earthquake in 2002. More recently, India Tv broke it when it brought stories from the back and the beyond, that caught the audience’s imagination. All said and done, the channel became the talk of the town. And finally “Colors” have done it with its innovative programming. Until Big Boss and Ballika Vadhu came to the audience’s conciousness, soneome else was ruling the roost. Therefore there is hope for every new entrant.

    After all every channel is only as good as its last show. If times now, ndtv and cnn-ibn are the big three today, it is only a matter of time till some other channel goes the colors way and does something pathbreaking!

    Its true that all channel carry the same news, which is why presentation is so crucial. Recall value is the main touchstone. If the last experience with a channel is memorable, the viewer will come back to it.The channel that connects best with the viewer is one that is crisp and clear in its content, one that evokes the right response and one that engages the viewer with a rivetting, and refreshing style. Ofcourse achieving that ideal is a huge challenge.Lets give the new entrants some time.

    [Reply]

  • Suman

    Sorry, meant NewsX, proper name of the best news channel on TV. IBN is close second. If they stop going yadayadayada, they will catch up with NewsX

    [Reply]

  • Atul Lal

    For once, I will disagree with Mr Sanghvi.

    I believe that media companies seem to have forgotten what their true reason for existence is. It is Return to shareholders, or is it delivering news, and associated analysis / opinions to its audience?

    Look at the amount of advertising on TV / Print.

    Take India Today. Till recently, I always considered it to be an advertising supplement with editorial content thrown in between. Those fold in front covers almost made me stop reading it.

    Why, even on HT, the amount of Column Centimeters ads take are higher than content. Are these euphemisms for the Internations Product / Services Finder?

    If we see TV, for some inexplicable reason, all the ad breaks coincide on each news channel. And on some channels you have to contend with 3 to 5 minutes of ads before you get any content worth watching. And when one does get content, it is a shabby repeat of the earlier break. Are TV assuming that thier viewers log in every 5 minutes, and need a complete capsule before they move over to some other channel?

    Many times, BBC ends up reporting news that does not even find mention on local news channels. How strange is that? Please spare me the caterwauling of the Hindi news channels, or the deafening arrogance of Rajdeep Sardesai, or the righteous dismissiveness of an Arnab Goswami.

    If the media does not get its positioning right (and that does not happen by sitting in proverbial ivory towers), there will be instances galore, print or TV, of failures.

    Give us what we want, and we will repose our faith in you.

    Take us for granted, and live with the uncertainity.

    And speaking of print, raddi prices have shot up after the Govt banned polybags.

    Now, Is that an opportunity?

    [Reply]

  • Nmankale

    I agree with Vir Sanghvi that news channels are going downhill. Even entertainment channels are not attracting viewers. If you compare our TV channels – news and entertainment – to the western (american) channels, you will realise that our news channels are not professional. The news readers / anchors are so self centric and love to hear their own voice. Also coverage is not good. Hence of late people are not watching TV as much as sa one year before. Hope this phase brings some sanity back in our lives where the channels realise that news should be real news and not just cricket and stars and other superficial things. My 2 cents worth!

    [Reply]

  • Shahnawaz Akhtar

    Sir,
    Going through your well analysed article I feel you are partially right that the attraction of tv channels is not so much as before. There is always a room for the new entrant, because people want a change frequently.
    The other reason is absolutely the contents of the news have been not so imperative, it has become rather entertaining. People are still serious about news , they want really thought proviking story and of course reality, in the name of news, but they do not get it in the entertaining news channels of these days. Print media is gaining popularity as the middle class hindi speaking population is increasing. People can easily find local and national / international news in print media in their regional language at very affordable price.

    [Reply]

  • rabindra

    Dear Sir;
    Although India has a vast pool of educated people, but sorry to say that our MEDIA is largly politically /commercially inclined, just ignoring their very basic duty of reporting (we need just unbiased news).
    Can we expect some improvement here?
    See most of the TV channels have decided please some GANDHI or the Other (Sonia, Varun etc) and not highlighting 100’s criminal contesting in this Election, who will get elected in few days only to rule us and mak life difficult for every spectrum of life.

    To say the least, No one even bothers in their dream to report on Poverty, Illetracy, Corruption, red tepism, villages, Farmers committing suicide, also no reporting done on Huge SWISS bank deposits unpatriotic people (which snatched from common man’s pocket, id collected will errdicate poverty from India).

    May be this writing will put some though in your mind, you may write jena601@gmail.com

    Thanks and best regards
    Rabindra Jena

    [Reply]

  • Suraj

    ….Of course there is nothing like saturation …untill unless one think in that way. Innovation is the word.

    Idea is to entertain …the viewer ..rather …dumping anything or everything. See …he likes entertainment …which has its different dimentions…..after all he is a living being. how cud you expect …that whatevr being thrown upon ..he will take. Yeah ..i do admit …since he has time to consume …it doesn’t matter …he is the foolest of all. then comes ….Innovation..dat Color identified. It entertains the viewer …in positive sense. so to say ..it has the touch …on viewers nerve or ..watever that may be. So before becoming mototonous …be aware ..of the word ..Innovation. It’s free for all.

    For print media … they are trying to mixing up with ..masala …and news… save few pages. I believe that …rather going short term ..gain.. ..it should ..be more aligned to long term objectives. i think …most of the today’s print media ..is looking for short term…..save again very few. One of the ..Innovation can be long term objective ..of nation building ..as far as basic idea of print media is concern ..as what we read leaves ..much greater impression than any other form….

    I hope …it make sense. [:o]

    [Reply]

  • Raj

    well look at media also as a business. then it needs t deliver goods and services. What are the goods and services?? good news, correct reporting..not yellow journalism and painting of saffrn/hindu as extremists…. u stop that and present the accurate picture…u will win…if not u will become irrelevant and die a natural death…..simple economics!!!!!

    [Reply]

  • pavitra

    Why does(do) quack intelligentsia(s) take the JOB to comment on spirituality with out knowing the objective and existential realities about self and human being: I could not understand. Do they not feel that their writings and sayings drags readers and listener to the area of SUBJECTIVE HALLUCINATION.Which facilitate the people for accepting mercurial and arbitrary conclusions about GOOD, TRUTH, JUSTICE, UNIVERSALITY and HUMANITARIAN CHARACTER. As per these people so called GOD ( unproven and unconfirmed faith of human being ) is only the perfect and person can attain the EXCELLENCE only; Whereas reality is that standards of perfection and excellence are created and formed by human beings only on the basis of POWER; the EVIL.

    [Reply]

  • https://me.yahoo.com/a/NJgNuLUmq5Itz8Qd3ypKBXkOQ8Uh#8a5a0 ashok

    The columnist sure has his ear to the ground.

    [Reply]

  • Sharma_r81

    Totally disagree. India has always axed its captains whenever it lost overseas… and it was always counter-productive. Lets instead face the truth. We suck in away matches. A green pitch makes us see red. We are tigers at home and mice away. So lets not blame only the captain. Lets look within and at the BCCI, which despite years of bitter experience has refused to make fast pitches on which our local teams can practice.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Our players can only be made to perform only if-
    1. BCCI fine them 100% of match fee for every loss (the players who underperformed)
    2. Ban underperforming players from playing in IPL.
    3. Ban underperforming players from signing any commercial deal.

    These guys don’t perform because they know money is raining for them in India in the form of IPL and ads.

    [Reply]

  • ge wang

    Thanks for sharing such a useful site, I will be checking your blog for further updates!

    .sexylovedolls.com.

    [Reply]