Birth of an era



When we talk about the geniuses of Indian publishing and write about the magazine boom, there is one name that rarely comes up. And yet, in my view, there is nobody who has been more influential in the development of the Indian magazine industry than Nari Hira.

If your response is, “Nari who?” do not be perturbed. That’s how Nari Hira likes it. Throughout his astonishingly influential career, he has kept a low profile, promoted young people and then sat back and let them take the credit for achievements which are largely his own.

If the name Nari Hira means relatively little to you, then I am sure that the name Stardust will certainly ring a bell.

Stardust was the first modern Indian magazine. Not only did it virtually invent literate film journalism (after the broken English of the Baburao Patel and Devyani Chaubal era), it also invented people journalism for the Indian market.

It happened this way. Hira ran Creative Unit, an advertising agency, which employed a talented former model called Shobha Rajyadhyaksha. One day, Shobha told Hira that she was bored of advertising and wanted to leave. “Don’t go,” he told her. “Let’s start a magazine.”

And so, the two of them started Stardust with Nari as the owner and Shobha as the first editor. Not only did Stardust transform the relationship between film stars and journalists, it also began the process of taking Hindi cinema to an English-speaking audience. Throughout the Seventies, even as Bollywood movies were resolutely down-market, Nari and Shobha managed to write sophisticated articles about the stars that were read even by those who never bothered to watch Hindi films.

I may be exaggerating but I do believe that if Stardust had not created this constituency, there would be no audience for the movies of Aditya Chopra, Karan Johar and Farhan Akhtar. Stardust made Bollywood hip and a new generation of film-makers reaped the rewards.

In the late Seventies, Shobha said she was bored again. So, Nari encouraged her to start a new magazine. She decided that she wanted to start a woman’s magazine, meant, she said at the time, “for the woman who does not think with her uterus.” She decided to call it High Society until, shortly before launch, Nari found a hardcore porn magazine called High Society on the news-stands in New York.

So, they settled on Society as a title. In a month or two, it became clear that a) the magazine was much better at people coverage than it was at tackling women’s issues and b) that Shobha was bored again.

Shobha left soon after launch to start her own Celebrity magazine and Nari hired Leela Naidu to replace her. Leela turned out to be a figurehead and Nari ran the magazine himself, behind the scenes. His vision was simple: Society would be a people magazine that would refuse to kiss ass just as Stardust had refused to suck up to movie stars in the way that such magazines as Filmfare had done.

Take away Stardust and Society and you have no Indian magazine boom. The two magazines between them set the template for many of the magazines that followed. Editors came and went but the quality never suffered because Nari was always the super-editor.

Since then, Nari has launched many other magazines of which Savvy is probably the most famous. He does many other things and his career has taken in the establishment of Bombay’s Otter’s Club, a successful travel agency in New York, a book-selling operation, various low-budget movies and a home décor exhibition sideline. All of them have made lots of money for him.

But his heart remains in the magazine business. His devotion to his publications is matched only by his commitment to the staff. He will hire people with no experience, will nurture their careers and will make them editors, never ever acknowledging publicly that he has been entirely responsible for their success.

Even now as the Indian magazine market faces an onslaught of foreign titles, Nari’s products have more than held their own. Stardust is a global phenomenon. No magazine of its type has as much impact on any film industry anywhere in the world. Society remains in a class of its own. I won’t compare it to the suck-up magazines, the Hellos, the OKs, Hi Blitzes and the sadly disappointing People, which are content to print any lies that any self-promoting neo-celebrity tells them.

In fact, Society deserves to be compared to other, more serious, magazines. I nearly always learn something I did not know when I read it. And am always astonished by its willingness to tell it like it is, attacking the famous and the powerful if the story demands it.

I haven’t met Nari for years. He must be nearly 70 by now. But judging by his photographs he looks exactly as he did when I knew him in the early 1980s. Because I know his style I can spot his interventions in his magazines and they are nearly always delightful.

In a world that is full of shysters and self-promoters, it is encouraging to find a true pioneer who seeks no credit for himself. But one day, when the history of Indian publishing is written, Nari Hira will get the credit he deserves.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (17 votes, average: 4.35 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://www.CareerAdviceByRandy.com Randy Pena

    Hello.

    I would like to put a link to your site on my blog roll if you want to do the same for mine. It would be a good way to build up both of our readerships.

    thank you.

    [Reply]

  • http://diptakirti.blogspot.com Dipta

    I have quite a few Stardust issues preserved from the early 70s and am quite amazed at the ‘investigative’ journalism they did and the stars they put down in every issue! Wonder how many law suits they had to battle?

    To poke fun at the industry, there was a period when Stardust used to do a very quirky Awards special every year. Awards like Best Death Scene, Most Romantic (read: cheesy!) Dialogue etc. This came around the time of the year when Filmfare awards were given and this tongue-in-cheek award issue was a brilliant foil to the ’serious’ ones.
    Pity they stopped it in favour of their own Awards, which are somewhat like a poor cousin to the other ones.

    [Reply]

  • Rajinder

    I fully agree with Vir about his comments on the society magazine. It, indeed offers quality stuff to its readers. And thanks Vir for letting me know about the man behind “Society’.

    [Reply]

  • Amitabh Varma

    Nari Hira was also instrumental in the launch of video films in the mid-eighties. Aditya Pancholi used to act in most of them.

    [Reply]

  • Jyotisman

    Stardust is indeed one of the better magazines on the Indian film industry and celebrities. I remember as a child I would eagerly pick it up from the library shelves and devour its content. Great work Nari!

    [Reply]

  • Srini

    Vir, You are right when you say Nari was a pioneer, but your conclusions on some of the magazines is completely off the track. you know that you were being influenced when writing on Stardust. It is a yellow journal and its crculation says so too. No one takes it seriously. It is the other extreme of Hello and OK, published by your friend Vijay Mallya. It has been sliding since the last 10 years. Flimfare and People remain the dominant forces.

    [Reply]

  • Ramesh Talwani

    A NATION WHO HAS PERSON LIKE KAPIL SIBAL AS EDUCATION MINISTER,WHO CAN LIE ON 2G SCAM -ZERO LOSS THEORY OR HANDLING BABA RAMDEV ,WHO HAS SUCH A LOW CREDIBILITY – COULDNOT GETOUT OF HIS CAR IN CHANDNI CHOWK SHOULD BETTER QUIT EDUCATION.
    WE NEED A SELF RESPECTING INDIAN WITH PRIDE IN INDIAN ETHOS.
    HE SHOULD BETTER GET BACK TO HIS LEGAL PRACTICE RATHER THAN PLAYING WITH FATE OF BILLION INDIAN CHILDERN.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.blurbpoint.com/link-building-services.php Link Building Services

    Only spending lots of money and to build the colleges and universities is not the enough thing and to make education globally is not required. Instead of this , people of India need to get the such education by which they can get the own growth and not the money growth. And the leader like kapil sibbal can see the education only with the money benefits point of view and not interested to update the current education system.

    [Reply]

  • Nidheesh Manu

    Dear Shafat,

    As an Indian I am ashamed of the atrocities we commit in Kashmir and the North East. As a citizen of India it is my responsibility to showcase dissent and act against them. Having said that, these are internal issues that we Indians have to deal with. You have more pressing concerns in your backyard – go figure.

    On the other hand if your intention is genuinely to act of as a voice for the downtrodden then lets do that in a civilised man. Take the lead or walk amongst us;we will gladly welcome you to our midst.

    This whole Indo – Pak story has become one of ‘my dick being bigger than yours’…Its adolescent and the bravado is fleeting.

    Lets try and behave and get along.

    Cheers,
    Nidheesh Manu

    [Reply]

  • Nidheesh

    India’s internal problems are not because of the Muslims who stayed behind. I wish we Indians wouldn’t talk in such terms.

    [Reply]

  • Neeta

    “His followers and other militants spread a trail of terror all over
    Punjab, specifically targeting Hindus. Buses would be stopped. Hindus
    would be separated from Sikhs and shot dead in cold blood. Prominent
    Hindus were assassinated. Funds were raised through robberies and
    extortion. Women were kidnapped and kept prisoner for the sexual
    gratification of militants. Bombs were placed in public places to kill
    innocent civilians. Moderate Sikhs were threatened and murdered.” – Hindus were separated from Sikhs and murdered?! There is literally no evidence of that! Sikh extremists did not target civilians, they targetted politicians some of whom were even Sikh like Beant Singh

    [Reply]

    Impi Reply:

    LIAR! I grew up in those times and I remember clearly. So do most moderate Hindus and Sikhs. It was in the news everyday. The period from 1982 to 1984 is dark in my memory. How did you miss it?

    Sikhs act like the government lost its mind and attacked the Golden Temple.

    It is only when KPS Gill and Beant Singh came in that Sikh militants were killed in encounters, that’s when collateral damage happened and innocent Sikhs were also killed alongside.

    This is a well written piece Mr. Sanghvi and I know you extend the same logic to Delhi and Gujarat riots.

    [Reply]

  • don

    we are searching about Rasia’s photo and can’t found it!

    [Reply]