After hibernating for over a decade, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad is back playing the Rama temple dhun.
It is certainly not in tune with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent assurance to the minority community of not allowing any religious group, belonging to the majority or minority community, to incite hatred against others, overtly or covertly. That is if the assurance was not a typical example of a politician’s doublespeak.
Senior office bearers of Ram Janma Bhoomi Nyas met in Ayodhya on Tuesday, 16th of June, to reiterate their demand for the enactment of law or creation of special bench in the Supreme Court to fast track the temple/mosque case. Ironically, it was almost after 12 years that the full board meeting of the Nyas was held in the temple town and the first after Modi came to power in May 2014 without any divine intervention. The All India Muslim Personal Board has been making similar demands.
By now, we all know that the emotive issue of Rama temple/Babri mosque is a matter of faith and may ignite communal temperatures but the disputed issue has lost much of its political charm in India, which is on the move. Modi and BJP’s national president Amit Shah also knew that their development model had more electoral appeal than the contentious issues of Hindutva, including construction of Rama temple in Ayodhya, in 2014. Then how would it help the BJP mobilise votes in the upcoming Bihar elections followed by UP. Undoubtedly, the two states were worst affected by the temple movement in the 1990’s. But not now.
The meeting did not limit itself to resolutions but also announced another public mobilisation campaign. In 1989, they had launched ‘shila pujan’ across the country and brought shilas to Ayodhya amidst much fanfare. The shilas are now rotting there . The Nyas will now be gathering stones from Indian villages for their use in the construction of Rama temple even though there is no guarantee when and how it would be used. Loads of carved stone have been lying in desolate Kar Sewak Puram in Ayodhya for almost two decades.
Ashok Singhal, now 25 years older than his age in the 1990’s, told the media that their stone gathering movement would be akin to the one taken up during 1989, when the temple movement was at its peak.
However, much water has flown down the Saryu all these years. A new generation born after the demolition of the disputed structure doesn’t get excited by such religious issues. They respect their faiths but won’t die for it.
It’s time the saffron brigade realises that building of a Rama temple or even Babri Mosque is unlikely in another century. The dispute dates back to 1885 when the first petition was filed by Nirmohi Akhara seeking permission to pray inside the disputed structure. In 1986 the Faizabad court had observed, “It is most unfortunate that a masjid should have been built on land especially held sacred by the Hindus, but as that event occurred 356 years ago, it is too late now to remedy the grievance.”
It’s time the Sangh Parivar accepts it.
I know I will be flooded by hate mails. But let me have my say.
I recently asked a friend, who is in the RSS, as to why Narendra Modi wears such a stern and serious look when in public? Read more
The outpouring over Narendra Modi has deluged all other issues, it seems. If you look at Modi’s elevation dispassionately, it is just a development that is having a cascading effect in his own party. Read more
The UPA government told Baba Ramdev to keep off Delhi for a fortnight. The BSP government told him to go to Delhi, if he so desired, via Haryana. The BJP government offered him full security in Uttarakhand. Read more
In some ways the national guidelines on communal harmony appear quite significant though I am not sure how far they would be practical. The guideline suggests an active role of the victims in tackling communal riots. Can sufferers actually turn into saviours? Perhaps yes. Read more
How can you claim innocence? Agreed public memory is ephemeral. Agreed a new generation has been born since the self-styled champions of Hindutva had pulled down the 464 years old disputed shrine in the temple city in full media glare? Yes, they may not know the facts. It’s history for them. Read more