Blood will always be thicker
The day Amar Singh, Anil Ambani and Amitabh Bachchan had raised a toast to celebrate the ascent of their friend Mulayam Singh Yadav to the Chief Minister’s chair, people were reminded of the Bollywood blockbuster Amar, Akbar, Anthony.
Some enthusiast had even painted posters on them and their friendship. I happened to see one of them at Singh’s residence in Lucknow. They zealously read an inherent message in their coming together — Netaji’s socialism gets a Bollywood and a corporate touch.
But soon the trio decided to tread their independent path. Anil Ambani quit the Rajya Sabha seat that Mulayam had gifted. Amitabh preferred his wife and Samajwadi Party MP Jaya Bachchan handle politics while he worked on the revival of his ABCL. Remember the lyrical lines on the channels in Amitabh Bachchan’s baritone voice, ‘Uttar Pradesh main hai dum, kyonki yahan zurm hai kum’ during the assembly polls. He was the brand ambassador of UP, the state where he was born.
And now it’s the turn of Amar Singh. The bonhomie has gone. Soon they will tread different political paths. In their own words, ‘I believe in looking ahead’ (Mulayam) while Amar remembered the famous lines, ‘Pathik ekla chalo.’
What puzzles me is that even a shrewd person like Amar didn’t know that in Indian politics blood is thicker than love and loyalty.
The tension between the two friends is not sudden. I remember my telephonic conversation with Amar Singh when discussions were going on on who would replace Chief Minister Mulayam if he decided to quit his chair and play a major role in national arena.
It was late in the night when Amar had called up. My question was obvious, the reply shocking. “Why Prof Ram Gopal is quite competent, he also handles Delhi for Mulayam?
After I dismissed the name saying Ram Gopal is more of an academician than a politician, Amar quipped, ‘Shivpal Singh Yadav and if not him then Akhilesh Yadav’. To my casual question as to why not Amar Singh, he had quipped, ‘because I am not a Yadav.”
Two days back when Amar on his return to Delhi was counting the family members holding various offices in the party I was instantly reminded of that night’s conversation.
Many may still believe that Amar would remain in the party as an ordinary worker, others may even predict the coming together of Amar-Mulayam, the fact is they have drifted apart and their supporters will try hard to widen the differences and not close them.
Why is Amar planning political programmes if he quit the posts on health grounds?
Amar had once told me, “The first thought to quit politics had come to me when I was in Singapore for treatment. Politics is very cruel. If something happens to me, the utmost the party would do is hold a condolence meeting. But it’s my family, my two daughters, who will suffer. Not the party. Look at the pressure on me. My children are small”.
Perhaps Amar’s calculations went haywire. One, he wrongly believed Mulayam would not find his replacement – in his words ‘someone who can fight legal battles, work on communication chemistry.’
Secondly, in believing friendship will be thicker than blood. Yes Mulayam did marginalize his senior leaders to keep him in good humour, but not when own blood is involved.
Thirdly, in believing that he has no stakes in politics as he neither aspire to be a Union minister or a Chief Minister.
Politics often puts forth much more than that. Who else knows is better than Amar Singh himself!
Hindustan Times



Pravin Tiwari Reply:
January 20th, 2010 at 9:57 am
I surely agree with Rajeev. Yes, it was bound to happen. Everyone knows how political equations work. Look at the Shivsena, Same has happened in UP too. Amar and Mulayam are just new characters in old story.
[Reply]
Anil Kumar Reply:
January 21st, 2010 at 6:27 am
What irks me that these idiots will rather sit in opposition but won;t let their family rule weaken over the party. Today if Shiv-Snea is sitting in posititon it’s purely due to the fact that Raj Thackrey was overlooked by Bal Thackrey in succession battle.
Then we have in Bihar Rabri dumb Devi.. people still vote for these idiots.
These idiots make the case for congress family rule .. Had they practiced modicum of intra party politics liek BJP or communist India would have been spared the yoke of congress mediocrity and incompetence of 5 decade.
[Reply]
sunita Reply:
January 21st, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Anil,
——– it is also a fact that communists could never rule India and BJP came to power on a communal issue
Anil , till we, the electorate decide to vote for the best, they —- whatever you wish to call them—- will continue to play fames – family games. caste and communal games
They want power, by hook or crook
Anil Kumar Reply:
January 21st, 2010 at 9:21 pm
Sunita Ji you people have jaundiced vision when it comes to BJP.. Congress hobnobbing with Muslim Leageu is shove under carpet. Congress hobnobbign with soem Anjuma whose ultimate goal is shariah is shoved under carpet..
Rajeev gandhi doign Shilanayas is shoved under the carpet Rajeev gandhi unlockign Ram temple is dhoved under the carpet.. btu god forbid BJP talk abotu Ram temple they become communal..
Now go ahead and please find me even single sentence that could be termed communal in BJP Manifesto..
YEs they don’t have genrous offering of communal cards liek Haz subsiidy and yada yada but I forget that comes under secular bracket in India..
Praveen Saxena Reply:
January 23rd, 2010 at 5:06 pm
I think the biggest distortion is the complete takeover by the Left of the academia and the Press. The JNUites had a free run and are strongly entrenched in the academic field, Press, govt funded cultural bodies etc. The foot soldiers , the reporters, desk persons , the new entrants in the field of literature/ culture/Art /Music etc seeking to make a career in these fields have no option but to submit and obey . The grip of the LEFT is very firm and they work in tandem . In a situation where the businessmen owners are concerned only with the revenue streams , the overall scenerio regarding the Role being enacted by the Press and the impact they are having on society is serious. It is acceptable to loudly say that the communalism of the minorities can be ignored but that of the majority cannot be accepted. It is accepatable to call Leftist historians as ” noted historians” but those not agreeing with them are called ” BJP sympathisers”
The entire coverage , the language and the idiom is so lopsided that it is impossible to for the ordinary man with limited time, to have a true account or interpretation of events.
Rajeev Reply:
January 22nd, 2010 at 2:11 am
Sunita,
I have followed your blog closely and I sincerely believe you are rare breed of NEUTRAL journalist but I guess it is a requirement at HT to bash everything Hindu and anything remotely connected to BJP.
According to me all parties in India including congress do communal politics. The only difference is that media tries to hide congress and so called secular parties’ communal politics and never leaves an opportunity to berate BJP.
If there is communalism in India, it is purely because of muslims and christians who have programmed to believe that hindus are pagans and needed to be saved (read converted) or marginalised. The Indian media is not at all Indian in character rather it is controlled by foreign money so no wonder it continues to push western and islamic agenda in India.