China in Labour



Here’s an interesting claim

http://www.bcg.com/media/PressReleaseDetails.aspx?id=tcm:12-75973

The Boston Consulting Group has issued a report claiming that China’s labour costs are rising so rapidly that, combined with productivity gains in US manufacturing, many of the factory jobs outsourced to the Middle Kingdom will start to go in the opposite direction. Quite amazingly, the report claims that manufacturing salaries between the two countries will converge by 2015.

That time period seems a bit too short. And I am not sure if the US can expect to necessarily be the big gainer that BCG predicts. If the US and China are too expensive in terms of labour, surely there are other countries a maker of widgets can go to. India, obviously, is a probably place to go. But that is only if India gets its infrastructure into some decent shape over the next few years and, preferably, also gets its overly restrictive labour laws relaxed as well.

There is no shortage of options. What is interesting about a comparison of labour costs in Asia in the future is that how many Asian countries are roughly at the same place when it comes to wages An IMF comparison of Asian wage overheads show that India, Indonesia, Pakistan, Vietnam and, for what its worth, Laos all have the same rough wage costs – about $ 1000 as annual wage overheads per worker. See chart in:

http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2011/01/19/china-near-top-of-the-list-for-wage-overheads-in-emerging-asia.html

And then there’s Africa and possibly even parts of the Arab world. China has built itself an excellent industrial infrastructure with some of the most efficient logistical systems and cheapest power in the world. This is in part compensation for rising labour costs. It also has a lot of still poor people in its interior provinces who work for less than their more affluent coastal counterparts. But ageing is probably cutting into this as well. China’s geriatric revolution, especially in the next 10 years is quite remarkable.

http://www.uschina.usc.edu/article@usct?aging_china_14680.aspx

The stakes are large. China exported $ 1.58 trillion worth of goods in 2010. That’s a lot of capacity to start walking around the world looking for a new home.

The BCG report argues the US will get a large chunk of this prize because it will have the advanced systems to get a lot of the upper end stuff.

Again, this may be exactly where India will do best. After all, one of the more interesting phenomena of its trade profile is the huge surge in engineering goods exports. In April-February 2011, for example, the export of such goods surged over 80 per cent in India. I suspect auto components and intermediary manufactured parts were the bulk of this. Interestingly about 65 per cent of these goods went to the most competitive markets – the US and Europe. Indications that India is already in a good position to seize the moment, seize the market, as China prices itself out of the manufacturing trade?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (4 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Ashish

    @Pramit,
    I share your scepticism regarding the conclusions drawn by the report you quote at the outset. As you say, 1.58 trillion dollars of capacity does not suddenly find a new home! And, the home being US? Nah!
    China is not small; the part that is prosperous and exports to the rest of the world is by area and population not even 20% of the total China- we have not yet seen the trickle down effect. Why would capital flee China? It would flee the coast, the PRD and move inwards.
    The wage arbitrage correcting itself over a period of time is not new. We have seen it in our own software industry. The wage imbalance that existed 20 years back between India and US was a lot more than what it is today. How did the industry react? By moving up the value chain, by setting up software factories in tier 2 and tier 3 cities etc. Similar things will happen in China- at least no reason to suppose it would not.
    China is a atop a tiger it dare not get off- in its own interest, it has to push prosperity down to the interiors, spread education, create jobs in the interiors.
    Your comments about India’s oportunities in the engineering exports is spot on- away from the spotlight enjoyed by the IT industry- light engineering sector has worked quietly over the past many years where they could be on the cusp of great opportunities.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/hiteshking Hitesh Kapoor

    Thank you! for respecting Mr. J.N. Sharma in your blog, indeed he was a great man. Mr. C. B. Satpathy also might not be an exception.

    [Reply]

  • sksingh

    solution lies with the problems. Start thinking with the common man solution will come. No politician today talks of common man. Its always the PM or corporate. Gujrat sold its land to the corporate.

    [Reply]

    RG Reply:

    Yeah I’m thinking of common man from last 65 years ..and that’s all we did “thinking” – RG

    [Reply]

    RG Reply:

    Yeah I’m thinking of common man from last 65 years ..and that’s all we did “thinking” – RG

    [Reply]

  • AR

    private sector is primarily driven by profits….. one cannot force them to have impose employee reservations based on caste…… A pvt sector would just care about actual ability of its potential employee rather than the caste and creed he belongs to….. if you really want to empower all sections you got to do away with reservations …… Ensure that primary education is made compulsory and a quality education is imparted to all sections of society….. Make them equally capable and let them free to compete with each other…..

    [Reply]

  • dfer

    He can start by empowering a promising guy from a backward community to be the CEO of the county..a certain Mr. Narendra Modi. How bout that? :)

    [Reply]

    TMM Reply:

    So that he can divide and communalise this nation like he has done in Gujarat???

    [Reply]

  • Nishant kumar

    Does he own a mantra or similar to Namo Mantra, common the guy is too naive to even find his brain at the right place..

    [Reply]

  • corrupt congress party

    the mantra for success of any industry any here in the world had been the workers ability to perform to the best as per accepted company’s standards and as per if a person belongs to any lower class or minority such as scheduled class or backward class or belonging to a minority such as muslim .

    [Reply]

  • corrupt congress party

    if the rahul wants to give away jobs because a person belongs to the minority or a lower class .then he would be better off giving away some of the money his mother has looted thru various scams to the tune of $900,000 crores and increasing daily,instead of asking industry to give the jobs away whether or not a person is qualified to do it or not.

    [Reply]

  • AshishC

    Spin away…
    Rahul speech received a lukewarm reception because it was anti-pvt sector? Or pointed out non-inclusive nature of pvt sector policies?
    It received a lukewarm response because it showed up an immature young man for what he is. It was a speech full of “huh” and “duh” moments.

    Sample these:

    - “if you can do business in India, you can do so on the moon”- Who takes credit, Mr Gandhi?

    - China’s development/ social sector progress got dismissed, rather arrogantly- “dragon”/ “simplistic place”/ lack of accountability- witness this driver who ran over pedestrians and absconded. Point??

    - Beehive – again, what was the point? That we all slog and the Queen bee grows rich?

    Anyway,

    [Reply]