Indo-Pak presser from hell



(An informal remembrance of the Indo-Pak foreign ministers’ meeting in Islamabad on July 15)

1. Press conference scheduled for noon is suddenly put off. Oooh. Something big in offing. I’m asked if I would like to ask the sixth and last question of the Q and A. I say aye.

2. Thirty-plus Indian party head to Pakistan Foreign Ministry building in three buses. Presser, we are told, will be 245.

3. Arrive at press room an hour earlier. Bugger. Pakistani scribes already in place. All the chairs are gone. I find an empty seat in the back of the room, behind two lines of TV camera crews.

4. Indian spin doctors tell me I have to sit in front since I’m asking a question. No seat. So I join others sitting on the floor near the podium.

5. Air conditioning struggling. I count about 40 TV cameras. Two people per camera. Plus 150 or so diplomats, print people and lesser beings. 250 people. Islamabad in July. Quite warm.

6. Podium is fronted by a big rectangular wooden thingie with a flower arrangement on top. Looks familiar. I turn to a Western journalist next to me: “Doesn’t this look a coffin?” She looks. “Yes. It does.”

7. Suddenly all the cameramen come to life. Everyone runs to their seats (or part of the floor). False alarm.

8. Minutes pass by. Room getting stuffier. People inside getting stickier. After a few hours past the supposed starting time, everyone is joking. “Having brought peace to India and Pakistan the foreign ministers’ must have moved on to the Israeli-Arab conflict and Taiwan.”

9. About six everyone rushes to their seats again. Ministers have arrived. They go upstairs and continue talking. False alarm.

10. Hear rumours water is being served in a corner. Go there. Urban myth. End up taking a swig from a journalist who has brought a bottle from the hotel.

11. A white-clad waiter with a teapot on tea tray walks into the room. Everyone applauds. Refreshments. Then he walks out. For the negotiators, we are told.

12. Pakistani scribes make up for their boorish government by surrendering their seats to the female Indian journalists who are sitting on the floor. “You are guests,” they explain. Being male I don’t benefit.

13. Young Pakistani next to me gets excited on finding out I share his last name. Tell him it is a less exalted name in Bengal than it is in Punjab. Chaudhuri vs Chaudhury. He works for government radio. He assures me it is purgatory. Lots of political pressure. “I cannot leave. Once you are a government journalist, you are marked for life.”

14. Another rustle at the entrance. It’s been nearly eight hours. No water. Lots of sweat. Good preparatory ground for a commando. “You will be expected to survive in a government building for hours. No water. No food. You will live only on your wits and write only what you catch in the wild. Do you understand, soldier?” The ministers arrive. It’s the real thing.

15. SM Krishna and SM Qureshi make separate statements. Talk about desiring cooperation and good neighbourliness. How they respect each other. How everything is sweetness and light. Clearly didn’t agree on anything whatsoever. Pakistani journalists murmuring how tense and tight-lipped Qureshi is.

16. They can’t possibly allow questions. I am wrong. The first question reflects an eigh hour wait for nothing. “The two of you made us wait for so long and accomplished nothing. Do you have an explanation.” To be said with contempt and rudeness.

17. Krishna and Qureshi waffle through the questions. Qureshi attacks Indian Home Secretary’s interview from the day before, prefaces it with the words, “We both believe…” 250 heads turn to look at Krishna. Horizon gazing. “He didn’t hear the word ‘both’..,” say muttering heads.

18. Qureshi asked about terrorist chief Hafiz Sayeed’s anti-India statements. “You refer to Hafiz Sayeed’s statements. May I draw your attention to the Indian home secretary’s statements on Pakistan…” 250 heads turn to look at Krishna. Horizon gazing. Someone says, “He’s been negotiating for 10 hours. He’s an old man….” But it is clear the two are now playing to their domestic audiences.

19. The pre-arranged six questions are over. Getting up to leave. Running through synonyms to use in the heading. “Deadlock or stalemate?” “Collapse or fiasco?” One Pakistani fellow yells, “Sir, we have waited so long. We should be allowed more questions!” Qureshi suddenly raises his arm. “I agree with my friends in the media. They should ask more questions.”

20. Questions come. But now it’s whoever yells the loudest gets heard. Things were going downhill. Now they go off a cliff. “What are you doing about Indian terrorism in Balochistan?” “What about Indian soldiers using rape as a weapon against Kashmiri women?” And so on. It ends with one long tirade to Krishna about the horribleness of Indian policy in Kashmir. Krishna looks angry. Gives a curt, “That’s your opinion.” 21. 21. Suddenly the conference is over. Journalists run to the door. Indian official team disappears. Qureshi begins spinning immediately. Holds an impromptu press conference on the stairs.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (6 votes, average: 4.33 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • bala srinivasan

    this is the outcome of copycat western press conf.neither the media is truly interested except their country’s or even the specific publishing house.no balance or decency but emotion&prejudicial.so it is almost impossible to expect any useful outcome just like the foreign ministers meet itself.

    [Reply]

  • ghallughara

    Waste of time and money, these realtives of Mugals will always hate India, and will never stop terrorise
    India, these international FAKIRS, LIERS, CRIMINALS, BEGGARS, BLOOD SUCKER EVILS, etc….
    they don’t want to improve relations with India, these FAKIRS left befind in life, they rather beg from international community, this overheated and shameless 170 million terrorist, like to see blood.

    [Reply]

  • sr

    Looks like pakistan came out victors in pushing their propaganda according to this narration. Equating the home secretary’s statement (which i agree was untimely) to a terrorist head (not part of the official response) seems crazy – why didn’t any of the journalist ask, so Mr. Querishi, do you accept that hafiz sayed said that and do you agree with it?

    why aren’t jurnalists putting politicians on the spot with questions? is it because they are afraid? or are they not allowed by their company? or is it the risk of being cut-off from the loop, if you do so?

    I believe we need to engage with pakistan (as there is no other alternative) but engage with them assertively – otherwise, they make a fool of every minister talking to them … send subramaniam swamy – by the way, what happened to him?

    [Reply]

  • Neutral

    As ever nothing else but blame games. Peace can never be accomplished due to the childish politicians on both sides. It starts with creating lots of hopes for common men on both side who are starving for peace for almost a century. And always the talks end with abusing each other for failure. There should be in camera talks , so people can see who is laying and expose the hawks on both sides which cause failure to peace efforts. In the past politicians blame it on Pak army and Indian bearucrates. But what is the truth , how sincere are the Politicians? secret hands on both sides denying peace to billions of poor people need to be exposed.

    [Reply]

  • Neutral

    Good column though. But media is also equally responsible for adding fuel to the Fire. And fostering hate in the mind and hearts of people on both side and mostly losing rationality. Only a positive role from media and cooperation between journalists on both sides toward peace is only HOPE.

    [Reply]

  • Harry

    Thats was really a hell.I agree.
    I hope Qureshi doesn’t come to India and we don;t have to go through this ordeal again. There should be no more talks.

    [Reply]

    Praveen Saxena Reply:

    Only goes on to show that Pakistan is a boorish country with an uncouth foreign minister who lacks minimum etiquette. Much better and more civilized arrangemnents are made by Indian Govt bodies in domestic press – conferences.

    [Reply]

    Rajeev Reply:

    In short, we got royally sc*rewed by Pakistanis especially Jihadi Qureshi and Fanatic media.

    If we don’t reciprocate this hospitality in November, we should simply admit defeat and merge India with Pakistan under Pakistani flag.

    [Reply]

    vijay kumar Reply:

    Rajeev,

    I would disagree. Our Foreign Minister is soft spoken, that’s it.

    Remember Narasimha Rao. He too was Soft spoken , yet after Indiara Gandhi was the only Prime Minister who could see through the duplicity of the Pakistanis.

    So even as Benazir did her histrioncs show on the world media, Rao was smart eough to organise RAW to match ISI’s terror with terror. It was around 1194 when we started retaliating for Punjab and Kashmir by actions in Sindh and Karachi.

    Unfortunately an idiot called I K Gujral surrendered everything in the name Jhelum diplomacy.

    And today Pakistan continues with its game, while we have surrendered all our assets.

    I think we should pick up from where Indiara Gandhi and Narasimha Rao left us.

    [Reply]

    AliKhan Reply:

    Yes Vijay great suggestion!! while you sit safely tucked away in your home in front of your computer encourage the killing of thousands more on both sides!!

    Vijay Kumar Reply:

    We have been suffering at the hands of brainwashed jihadis who feel that they are goping to jannat by killing innocents. Time we kill a few of them :)

  • Rajiv

    SM Krishna, should be summararily dismissed after that pathetic performance.

    [Reply]

    Rao Reply:

    I like these on the spot notes vs all the contrived or constrained reporting!

    [Reply]

    vijay kumar Reply:

    Er.. .. the date is 1994 and not 1194 !!

    [Reply]

  • http://Hindustantimes.com Anil Ruparelia

    Even though I don’t agree with Mr. Krishna’s comments about Mr.Pillia’s responce, I will tell one thing that is for sure. Pakistan is treuly a Hell on the this Planet we call Earth.

    [Reply]

  • http://Hindustantimes.com Anil Ruparelia

    sorry, I meant truly a Hell on the planet we call Earth.

    [Reply]

    AliKhan Reply:

    Well its obvious that you are a hindu right winger and thats why you see Pakistan that way. To us Paistan is the best place on earth and India the garbage can of the earth!!
    To each his own!

    [Reply]

    diya Reply:

    Everyone knows reality anbout u pakis, whole wolrd knows u garbage peoples fdont have food to eat but need AK47 to kill innocent peoples, u r hell peoples everyone hates u islamic scum religion peoples. U r digging ur own grave and will get buried soon in it. TumharaBAAP america is tumhari mayyat karega , start preyin g ur last wishes,terrorists

    [Reply]

  • http://Hindustantimes.com Anil Ruparelia

    Is the moderator a Muslim?

    [Reply]

  • Panditiji

    Manmohan Singh and SM Krishna are the two worst softcocks in India and are well supported by other softcocks in MEA. In any other country, they would tried for incompetancy if not treason. Chidu and Pillai: KEEP IT UP AND KEEP THESE TWO OLD FARTS HONEST.

    [Reply]

  • Arbinder Singh

    Bilateral talks between a confused Democracy/Dictatorship like Pakistan and India (largest democracy) is fruitless. A part of Kasmir is held by both the countries so that is a resolve in itself. Pakistan or India is not going to get any more of Kashmir over and above. Case Closed!

    [Reply]

  • vijay kumar

    There is a Punjabi word, which probably has no parallel in other languages– KHAPPI.

    For all non Punjabis out here, let me explain and expand. A KHAPPI is a loud mouth, a braggart, a foot and mouth disease sufferer who walks around with his vocal chords working perenially with no link to his brain.

    KHAPPIS can be entertaining or boring or just plain PIA’s . (pain in the a_ _ _)

    However they owuld always be the centre of attraction in any group.

    Shah Mehmood Qureshi is clearly a KHAPPI of the loudest order.

    Let us nominate him the — “KHAPPI of the YEAR ” !!
    :)

    [Reply]

    Shaikh Saleem Reply:

    followed your frustration and its time i declare you as ”gappi of the year”. same comments all over the globe and on different forums. you’ve be caught with same mantra on various blogs.

    [Reply]

    vijay kumar Reply:

    Just goes to show that you are following me on all the forums… and yes you have no defence to shield your boorish foreign Minister who is the KHAPPI of the year… :)

    [Reply]

  • r

    there is a UN resolution for plebiscit and a promise by Nehru because at partition it was decided that all muslim majority states would join Pakistan. All the protest and killings should tell you and whole nation that they Kashmiris do not want to live with us, today or tomorrow we have have free it. I hope the sooner the better cuz we will stop bloodshed and earn our respect as a largest democratic nation in the world. That is the right thing to do whether be ethically, politically, economically and neighbourly.

    [Reply]

    Vijay Kumar Reply:

    Dear Pramit,

    I am now inserting an idea into your blog which is about India and Pakistan, but not strictly about the topic u were talking about. however it would indeed work as a platform for reforming our neighbour, as well solving our problems.

    It as below….

    ——————————————————————————————————

    TRI-FURCATING JAMMU and KASHMIR-

    a solution to India’s problems

    Jammu and Kashmir, the northest part of united India, is our pride and yet today is crying,

    needing our helping hand and a healing touch.

    So many formulae have been tried in the J&K and yet nothing seems to work as finally

    the separatists and the Pakistanis start creating problems and violence.

    Let us now, as Indians, seriously take up the proposal for tri-furcating J&K. This makes

    sense seeing the history and the violence which has almost killed 50,000 people.

    This will strengthen the secularism of India. If we can have separate states of Ladakh

    and Jammu, and Kashmir is reduced to 2500 sq km, things will be easily managable.

    The Kashmir problem which looks sizeable on the world map would immediately be

    reduced to the size it actually is. To a narrow strip of land, 30 km by 70 km in size.

    We could then use our resources to win over the hearts and minds of the people in this

    strip of land. As well as create a good infrastructure for tourism and industry.

    The salient features.

    a) Kashmir should be divided in such a manner that the river flow to the rest of India is unhampered.

    b)Terrorist violence basically happens in 2500 sq km. Once J&K is trifurcated, it would be easy for the army and the civil administration to control 2500sq km

    c)A plebiscite will never happen as we are too strong to let the world force us. However in case of a hypothetical situation that it does, then India has the right of taking the vote of Jammu, Ladakh and Kashmir.

    d) Pakistan has already integrated Baltistan as a seperate state, so we have to see what others are doing. In fact they have changed the demographic pattern of Muzzafarabad and occupied Kashmir so that Punjabis are in a majority.

    e) Once kashmir is reduced to 2500 sq km, it will make the separatists realise that their dream of a small landlocked independent country is futile.

    f) We can revoke section 370 for Jammu and Ladakh immediately after trifurcation so that patriotic Indians from all over the country can buy land and settle there.

    g) Ladakh has Lakes, mountains, and calmness as well as Buddhist tourist spots. A huge potential exists. While Jammu attracts lakhs for the Vaishno Devi Yatra.Once they shine, Kashmiris will be inspired to give up the gun and join the mainstream

    h) People of Jammu and Ladakh have time and again asked for separate states or UT status.
    Let us make them as states. Srinagar can be the capital of all three distinct identities of Jammu, Ladakh and Kashmir, and would be a Union territory.

    i) There is a huge section of people in Kashmir, Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims who always favoured India over Pakistan or freedom. They would always remain with us. Infact they would work with double zeal to get their brothers who have been misled, back into the mainstream.

    At the end of the day all people from the J&K region would be proud to be Indian. Currently we are holding the people of Jammu and of Leh-Ladakh hostage to the political machinations of a few outsiders.

    Why should we not, as Indians, push our government to start working on this tri-furcation?

    It is your duty as a proud Indian to tell your friend, your email contact, your local politician

    that he has to work for this.

    [Reply]

  • Sumer Dahiya

    Majority of Pakistani muslims are living in times of 12th century ( I would like to add our own Kashmere muslims to that catagory in view of ethnic cleansing of K.Valley ). Remember Jihadi Musharaf’s earlier statements as Army Chief. Until Pakistanis change their mindsets, there can never be peace agreements. In fact, they are mentally unable to reconcile to the present world realities. By now, India and the world , know their lies, lies and lies. Pakistan forgets the ancestor’s saying ’sau din chor ke, ek din sadh ka’

    America is being blackmailed to pay BILLIONS OF DOLLERS for pakistan’s deceitful acts due to which its attitude/behavior towards India continues to be of 12th century times. BUT this can go on for ever. Pakistan has previously paid historical price in spite of USA on their side AND will again pay in spite of Nukes. This will be due to their nuclear ‘Ahankaar’.

    [Reply]

  • Piyush

    It was good refreshing break to read a light hearted article on the Indo Pak press conference after going through all the cliches…

    Thanks and I sympathise . I believe scribes have more reason to be angry for inconclusive Indo Pak conferences. After all that time in the press room you have to get back home and make some story about the conference and figure out how not to make it a cliche

    [Reply]