Why China’s stack of US bonds means less than you think



T-bills aren’t America’s underbelly yet.

There is a widespread belief that the US must kowtow to China these days because there is one else who can finance America’s ballooning government debt. Post the global financial crisis, China is T-Rex – King of the US Treasury bill.

The statistical story of who bought and who dumped US assets during the financial crisis tells a more nuanced story.

Basically, though China did level off its purchases of Treasury bills in late 2008 and early 2009, it didn’t matter. Why? Because pretty much every other government in the world concluded that US government debt was the safest haven at a time of financial storm.

Further, I would argue China doesn’t seem to have made much of concerted effort to buy up US government debt in a strategic manner. If anything, among the BRIC countries, it has been pretty conservative in its purchases of Treasury bills. The amounts are large because its reserves are big, but nothing extraordinary as a percentage of its total foreign assets. (I take India out of this equation because the composition of its foreign exchange reserves is somewhat opaque and, anyway, over half is kept in deposits with other central banks rather than securities. See

I draw these crude conclusions by looking at the Council of Foreign Relation’s recent tabulations on foreign ownership of US debt and the reserves of the BRIC countries.

Foreign ownership of US Treasury bills actually peaked in the 1970s and 80s, when it touched about 40 % of the US government’s debt portfolio. Far from falling because of Lehman Brothers et al, it surges by about a third because of the crisis – but still far below the figure of the 1970s and 80s.

Why does it surge? Not because of China which pulls back from buying T-bills from late 2008 and early 2009 as the crisis comes to a head. Mind you, it doesn’t stop buying, it just levels off its holdings of T-bills.

This is not out of keeping with overall Chinese foreign asset holdings.

T-bills have generally been about a third of its foreign assets for the past five years or so. That percentage falls by just a few percentage points.

And there was no question of this roiling the markets. Because there is a veritable stampede towards T-bills by the rest of the world. The CFR charts show that Russia, for example, dropped everything for T-bills. Brazil moved away from dollar assets, but returned after several months but this time also went only for T-bills. Even India bought a few more T-bills than normal, though from a small base.

Paul Krugman and others have long argued that this supposed China hold over the US was a load of bovine excreta. If China dumped T-bills, he has argued, the dollar would weaken – and help US export more, and China would see a huge drop in the value of its remaining and enormous dollar assets. I would take it a step further. I suspect there would be enough buyers of T-bills in the Rest of the World that the US government wouldn’t have too much trouble financing its debt, even at present rates of interest. China is big, but it’s not that big. There are plenty of other countries who run large current account surpluses who also need to do something with their piles of dollars – most notably energy exporters like Saudi Arabia and export-driven economies like Germany and Japan. And they seemed to have bought up T-bills faster than China could slow down its own buys.

What is striking is that what got dumped were bonds issued by US government-sponsored enterprises, so-called agencies. These include government-backed mortgage-doling firms like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

They were treated like lepers by everyone. Beijing also dumped them, though at a more cautious pace than other countries.

So why does everyone go on about the T-bill connection? In large part this is about perception. I’ve heard so many US officials say about China, “We have to be careful with them, they are our bankers.” The evidence is that they are, but so are plenty of other governments. China has also occasionally reminded the US who owns whose debt. But, in real terms and in the present time, the truth is the US doesn’t really have all that much to worry. Let the US follow the Greek path of fiscal rectitude and over a few decades we could seriously be talking about the decade that China Bought America. But not yet.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (7 votes, average: 4.29 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Zaheerul Hassan

    I think media should stop now. let the couple enjoy. There are elements in India those have the desire to target Pakistan and as ususual starting dragging Pak-India relations in wedding issue. Lets ask our governments to resolve burning issues like Kashmir and water as per UNO regulations instead discussing stories like wedding of stars.

    [Reply]

    Rahul Sehgal Reply:

    Dude, what are you smoking? I want some too! :P
    Who the hell is talking about Sania Mirza?
    Seriously, what ARE you smoking?

    [Reply]

    Espi Reply:

    What was the provocation for Hassan to bring Pakistan into the discussion? After all Pakistan is bankrupt and wants large amounts of American “aid” which of course would be hogged first by its voracious army and what is left would be licked clean by corrupt poiticians and crooked contractors. It is acute inferiority complex that drives Pakis like Hassan to display his visceral hatred of India and link unrelated issues like Kashmir or Indus river water sharing with the merits of India buying US treasury bills.

    [Reply]

  • Kylie Batt

    The statistical story of who bought and who dumped US assets

  • http://%/q2131q2121 Kylie Batt

    А у меня уже есть давно!!!…

    T-bills aren’t America’s underbelly yet…..

  • Guest

    Who is financing it? The oil industry?

    [Reply]

  • Roger

    well said,no more to add,wars are planned that way…..who will cover the expences.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    your tax dollars (and counting) at work…

    [Reply]

  • http://mybloganilkhanna.blogspot.com anilkhanna

    there is an element of mysticism in creative work.Art and Religion are, then, two roads by which men escape from circumstance to ecstasy. Between aesthetic and religious rapture there is a family alliance. Art and Religion are means to similar states of mind.
    :clive bell.

    [Reply]

  • RajX

    It’s funny seeing an illiberal Islamist like yu talking about progressive citizens and liberalism. There is no end to your Islamist hypocrisy. Shameless.

    [Reply]

  • RajX

    Hey “vikram”, you want us to be friend with Pakistan? That Pakistan that sent people to attack Mumbai, the same Pakistan which conducted so many attacks on in Indian soil? Looks like you are more loyal to the ummah than to your country.

    [Reply]

  • RajX

    One of the best articles I have read laying out the challenges before the indian foreign policy establishment and their current state of lily liveried stupor.

    [Reply]

  • MSR Ayyangar

    A sensible article with the logic of power equations. Power begets respect and respect begets compliance. Power not shown is as good as absent. Politics of power is to exhibit but never use it. India has to learn a lot in mind control. But for that we have to break away from the slavery hangover that still persists.

    [Reply]

    Abu Ahmed Reply:

    Only now do we seem to have some extra dough to be spent on counter espionage activities. How many countries in the world can afford to spend money influencing politics of ohter countries like the USA, once-upon-a-time-USSR and now China? Do they have a BPL population of say 500 million at least?

    [Reply]

  • Impotent Rage

    I like your approach; did our leadership struck back after 2008? and you talk of striking at **** nukes? Do u imagine us to be Israel with the backing of the US and Europe?

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    What Mitra envisages is the policy of developed and wealthy nations. The only remark I would make on Mitra is that he is living in a fool’s paradise, or USA’s Israel. If India becomes as powerful as Israel, that is be able to wag the dog, then much more can be done in the foreign sphere.

    [Reply]

  • engrich

    Palestians are lazy good for nothing people

    hassan the only thing i can say is that u are an ignorant man.palestanian are very hard working intelligent and productive people.

    [Reply]

  • engrich

    support their cause and take away the pressure from the facist Arab regimes of Kuwait,Saudi Arabia,etc

    they are welfare states not fascist.israel is apartheid fascist state voilated many uno resolution.they are the secret intigators of most of the voilence in the region.

    [Reply]