Fine wine, oysters and Euro-despondency



I have come to expect that European conferences will be marked by excellent cuisine and mediocre ideas. It’s not that people who congregate on the Continent are somehow mentally addled by the taste of fresh oysters, endives and Chablis – it’s just that Europeans get ever more tongue-tied trying to match their soaring international objectives with their declining domestic capacities.

I had a sense of déjà vu at this year’s Brussels Forum, hosted by the German Marshall Fund for the United States (quite a mouthful, probably one polysyllabic word in German). If anything, the Euro-gap was even wider then ever.
There were three or four reasons for this impression. One was that the European Union gamefully continued to push those issues that would make the world a better place like carbon cuts, human rights, No More War and so on. Yes, there was an acceptance that Europe had to be more flexible and tack a little here and there. But the speechifying was replete with talk of values, confidence in the euro and diplomatic solutions to all and sundry.
Two was a distinct sense that the world was moving in another direction, one of hard-nosed power and national interests. The Great Yellow Hope of Europe a year ago had been China. China, speeding its way through its industrial revolution, it was argued, would become a responsible global power in an equally rapid fashion. Then Beijing got brutish about Tibet and the Dalai Lama. Then Copenhagen happened. And it’s been downhill since then. A Chinese delegate at the conference, after listening to a few Euro-dominated sessions, was contemptuous. “They don’t realize the world is changing,” he told me.
Three was a continuing lack of coherence within the governing structure of the European Union. I heard the new EU President, Herman von Rompuy, and the new EU Foreign Minister Catherine Ashton. Jose Manuel Barroso and a pantheon of other Euro-greats spoke. They were all articulate and intelligent. But ultimately “there was no there there.” Von Rompuy seems to be known best for his ability to write haiku. Barroso for trying real hard. And Ashton for fully mastering very thin briefing books.
Finally, the Europeans are again uncertain about their US crutch. They have found Barack Obama is not as enthusiastic about them as they had expected – because the EU continues to be so bad at going beyond words. So the Europeans went on and on about how they were sacrificing in Afghanistan, how the two sides of the Atlantic shared values and how they all shared genes, names and a few World Wars. But no one, including the attendant US diplomats, addressed why Obama skipped the last EU-US summit (reports had it he said “nothing much happened at the last one”).
So the forum proved a wonderful feast for the palate and a confirmatory one for the cerebrum. The oysters were indeed good, if mildly gritty (Euro-decline? Climate change?). Brussels was pleasant, but there seemed to be more Gypsy beggars on the street and more shuttered shops since my last visit some seven or eight years ago. But I didn’t feel like exulting as I walked about. I have a soft spot for the Belgians. After all, they invented cricket – even if they have since forgotten the fact and the game.
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://www.imcashsaver.com/Hosting cheap website hosting

    haha … the only who is posting the comments :D

    [Reply]

  • http://juanale68.adalsteinn.info/uncategorized/dont-lose-precious-time-on-these-weight-loss-programs/ Altha Twining

    Can I submit your post to my wordpress weblog? I’ll add a backlink to your forum. That’s one really great post.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.arackiralama.us ankarada oto kiralama

    Many people don’t understand the effects misleading effects. I knew what you meant. It can be more effective to give people little opinion with facts here. I recognize this problem but with little clue, so we must face the topic together. With new assurance, we hope that the skill of other categories can be found together. Nice people can work with great people, and great resource is important for us in analyzing the case. I’ve studied for more than 4 years to analyze them, but the fact still can’t be discovered. In order to do that, we must deal with the changes of management resources. With so many resources here, we can develop new ideas for solving to problem. Let’s give opinion, let’s discuss them, we can take charge with our resources. The last one but not least, I support your analyzes to face new one. With many resources that we can collect, all of them can be handled well.

    [Reply]

  • Ramesh Talwani

    Dear learned author,kindly clarify what was his role in PARTITION OF INDIA. WHY THIS GREAT SOUL DIDNOT FAST UNTO DEATH AT PARTITION,?WHILE THIS WAS HIS COMMON TOOL AFTER PUBLIC STATEMENT THAT PARTITION WILL TAKE PLACE ON HIS DEAD BODY.
    THOUSAND OF PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE THEY TRUSTED HIM.
    DID HE TRY TO CONVINCE JINNAH THAT PARTITION SHOULD BE ACCEPTED.?
    WHY OUR GREAT MAHATMA MADE SUBHASH TO QUIT AFTER BEING ELECTED 2ND TIME CONGRESS PRESIDENT AGAINST HIS SECRETARY?
    WHY HE CHOSE TO VISIT BENGAL IN1947 WHILE BLOODSHED WAS MORE SEVERE IN PUNJAB?
    WHY THIS APOSTLE OF TRUTH CHOSE NEHRU OVER PATEL AS PRIME MINISTER OF INDIA.?
    WHAT WERE THE CONSIDERATION.?

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    the biggest secret this exponent of truth hid and which has affected indias pOlity for the last 60 years . —he was instrumental in giving social recognition and his name to one mr firoz khan who married indira gandhi in london . INDIRAS NAME WAS CHANGED TO MAMOUN BEGUM . aFTER OPPOSITION BY KAMALA AND NEHRU THIS COUPLE BACK IN INDIA UNDERWENT A VEDIC FORM OFMARRIAGE FOR PUBLIC CONSUMPTION BY VEDIC RITES AS NERHRU THOUGHT THAT OTHERWISE BOTH HIS AND INDIRAS POLITICAL FUTURE WOULD BE IN JEOPARDY . GANDHI SOLVED TE PROBLEM BY DECLARING FIROZ TO BE HIS ADOPTED SON AND HENCE GAVE HIM THE NAME GANDHI

    THE REST IS HISTORY AND A DYNASTY WAS IMPOSED ON THE COUNTRY —-
    ONE WISHES THAT THIS APOSTLE OF TRUTH ETC WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE TRUTHFUL IN THIS MATTER AND MENTIONED HIS ROLE IN ALL THIS — TRUTH CAN BE TAILORED TO SUIT ONESELF AND ONES OPINIONS
    READERS CAN GOOGLE WIKIPEDIA FOR MORE DETAILS

    [Reply]

  • http://www.blurbpoint.com/link-building-services.php Link Building Services

    It is definitely true that there is nothing above than the truth. And if one speak truth for entire life then he/she does not have any kind of guilty through the life. And through the truth one can win the any kind of race whether it is of life. Even Mr. Gandhi spoke lie once during his life journey. And he has mention all the deeds which he has done ,in his book that is “Experiments of Truth”.

    [Reply]

  • Syd Ram

    Unlikely. I think the method of even compiling a selection committee should be revamped. After, all everything is to be earned on merit and not given to them because they played cricket earlier.

    [Reply]

  • R.Kannan

    While we need to make changes, there is a need to go about it carefully. Kohli is yet to establish himself as a regular in the test team. arnab is correct that changes are needed. Probably, the next test should have Dinesh Kartik, Rahane, Kohli, Rohit Sharma, Pujara, Raina/ Yuvraj, Jadeja, Ashwin, Zaheer, Yadav, Rahul Sharma / Ishant as the playing XI. Kartik should be recalled as he has runs against SA in SA & England in England before he was dropped as Sehwag returned. His innings were the start of Indian wins on those tours. There are a number of talented youngsters around but it would be better to give the captaincy to a more experienced player – Yuvraj or Raina or even Zaheer. Zaheer can certainly lead for a couple of years & pass on the mantle to one of the youngsters later. Dhoni is far too defensive on sporting pitches & his keeping / test batting record is far from good.

    [Reply]

  • Prince

    How people can become forgetful and thankless is being seen with their attitude once Dhoni and “Team” failed in two test series. The biggest reason for this failure is failure of our batting line up..but Dhoni has to be blamed for it. Gambhir and Sehwag have emerged as the most failure batsmen in these two series and before Dhoni is asked to resign from test captaincy, these two guys should be asked to leave team India and play for IPL in which they stay happy. Not a single pesonality in the current team is a better captaincy material than Dhoni. Records tell that.

    [Reply]

  • Bond

    Wonder what spark you see in Kohli apart from his omnipresent middle finger. If Kohli becomes the captain them we will have a team of brats who will hurl abuses after taking taking every wicket and scoring every half century.
    The temperament and behavior of Virat Kohli reminds me of the infamous Pandher Kohli of Noida.

    [Reply]

  • http://twitter.com/authorspeak BS Murthy

    Given his behavioural pattern Down Under,
    isn’t it a scary idea to have Kohli as skipper?

    [Reply]

  • vishal

    dhoni should not be blamed for it he cant go and bat for the whole playing 11 alone.its the batsman fault not dhoni .

    [Reply]