Censorship with Chinese characters



The day I thanked the Big Brothers of Beijing who whiteout all the naughty bits in their country’s newspapers and TV.

A decade ago, the Chinese government invited myself and some other Indian journalists to visit their country. While there were obvious limitations in state sponsorship, the great attraction was that the trip included a week in Xinjiang, a province in China’s extreme northwest. Xinjiang is more than off the beaten path – it helps to realize that it is so far from Beijing that it straddles the same latitudes as Delhi and Kashmir.

But Xinjiang is also home to a restive Uighur minority. The Uighurs are sullen and Muslim. Some harbour dreams of independence, all despise the Han Chinese and very small number have taken up Islamicist terrorism against Beijing. They aren’t very effective, according to some Pakistani truck drivers we met in the capital Urumqi. “Lazy and drunk,” they said dismissively. But they occasionally light a spark.

The morning we were to fly from Beijing to Urumqi, the English version of China Daily slid under our hotel doors had a story that an “explosion” had killed some 70 soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army in Xinjiang. It made the highly suspect claim that a truck carrying explosives had ridden over “a bumpy road.”

My heart sank. The trip is over, I thought. We had heard that Beijing was sending foreign journalists into Xinjiang in part because they believed it had been “pacified” and could now be showcased to the world. I shared my views with the other journalists when we went down to the hotel lobby that morning, suitcases ready, and waited for our official interpreter and handler, Mr Li.

But Mr Li showed up promptly with two taxis and without any fuss drove us to the airport. We flew for hours across China. The sky was clear much of the way. I had a window seat and can still remember vividly the dark purple, deeply fissured terrain that we passed over. While it may look enormous an a map, the truth is that China has only a little more arable land than Bangladesh. Much of the rest is formidably hostile to human settlement. And you could see much of it, both in terms of its vast size and its inhospitability, on this flight.

We landed at Urumqi and Mr Li took us to a shiny multi-storied hotel. When we had checked in, I commended Mr Li. “I hadn’t thought we would be brought here after what happened here yesterday,” I said.

He looked puzzled. “What happened?”

I pulled out the China Daily and showed him the story. His eyebrows rose.

He quickly pulled out his own newspaper. It was in Chinese which I can’t read, but I presume it was the People’s Daily. He quickly went through it, page by page. “No mention in here,” he said, and shrugged.

I thought he sounded relieved. He had the perfect cover if his boss rang up and yelled at him: “Are you mad to bring foreign journalists the day after a terrorist attack?” He had the perfect excuse. He could say: “How was I to know? The Chinese language newspapers and television didn’t mention it.”

It crept into the press a day or two later. China’s then economic czar, Zhu Rongji, was shown visiting victims of the blast and denouncing “splittism” – the code word for ethnic separatist groups like the Uighur East Turkestan Movement. I presumed that confirmed that it was Uighurs who were responsible. though some British diplomats, years later, were to say they actually thought it was an ordnance malfunction.

It was one of the few times that I’ve ever thanked censorship, especially one as tight as China’s. Of course, I was back to cursing it the evening of my first day in Urumqi when I found that most of the better known English news websites – the BBC, CNN, most US and UK newspapers, and of course Yahoo and Google – had been blocked. I got around it by going to the Indian website, rediff.com, which carried the same stuff but was fortunately unknown to the Chinese censors.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • vivek

    China believes in Gandhi’s three monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil, talk no evil and evil is defined by the Chinese communist party every morning!

    [Reply]

  • http://www.blurbpoint.com/link-building-services.php Link Building Services

    These days truth just remains in the talk and not in the life on the person. And if person is completely true then he does not need to find the goodness and beauty anywhere else , but through the truth he/she can find the beauty of the heart in own self. Thanks for sharing such nice article on truth with us.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Some MYTH busters:

    a) Lokapal will be an uncontrolled monster: Please go through the fine prints of Jan Lokpal draft, same is there on the net. It talks of creation of a body (Lokpal) which will create a fine balance among all three pillars, Lokpal, Legislature and Judiciary, all three will be independent of each other, yet keeping an eye with a legitimate control on each other.

    b) Media is fair: There is a huge amount of money being spent by the ruling dispensation (congress and its allies), they have bought media and spending huge money on Online Reputation Management which means online agencies are hired who have deputed huge manpower to counter the growing anger against govt, this paid team writes blogs, articles, comments (like you are seeing above and below) and create a sense of sympathy for the govt. and try and prove that public opinions are highly divided and more against Anna. Similarly news Channels are organizing detabes but keeping the panel highly imbalanced, invariably it will be 4 v/s 2 (two from govt. two from govt. funded NGOs or Print publication chief editors and two from team Anna), channel will give an impression that it’s a balanced panel which is not. Also you see the entire discussion will be designed to tilt towards vindicating govt. standpoint. How? Please closely observe and you will notice that amount of time given to air their view will be a lot to govt. and govt. controlled representatives while team Anna voice will be curbed there also.

    c) Anna is playing politics: When Congress says that Team Anna is indulging into politics then Congress needs to learn the very definition of politics. Politics is done for political gains. Team Anna has time and again reiterated that they will never fight an election. If opposing the ruling dispensation means gain to the opposition parties then one can’t help.

    d) Kiran Bedi is corrupt: Corruption or Bhrashtachar or Bhrasht Acharan first needs to qualify the criterion of ‘intent’ of personal gain. In Kiran Bedi’s case her ‘intent’ was to generate funds for NGO for good cause. Diggi Raja was equating Kiran Bedi’s act with that of Kalmadi and A Raja where the ‘intent’ behind the gross irregularities are well known.

    I urge the people of this country to keep up the pressure and beware of the paid PR and other tactics of govt. which can go any length to sabotage this movement.

    Please DON’t PAY HEED TO THESE GOONS & KEEP SUPPORTING ANNAJI.

    [Reply]