First taste of single malt and making my own blend of whisky



This week’s special treat is a guest post from Sai Raje who works on my team and recently returned from a trip to UK and Scotland.

I was never a whisky lover who could wax eloquent about the finer differences between a whisky and a whiskey. But blending your own whisky at a Scottish Highland distillery is just the sort of thing that turns you over to the other side.

I know that ‘I had stepped into a scene from a Hans Christen Andersen fairytale’, is not the sort of tacky opening line you’d expect in a description of a distillery. But what else can you say about a 175-year-old distillery that has a cosy little cottage with wisps of smoke rising from its chimney for an office and a gurgling stream behind it thrown in for good measure?

Only European red oak casks will do for our single malt

Only European red oak casks will do for our single malt

The whisky distillery that displayed no external signs of being one had a definite appeal to someone like me who doesn’t get too excited about the golden stuff. My encounters with whisky have been few and far between, limited to a sip (only tried a few cheap, Indian blended whiskies so far) and usually followed by a grimace. When it comes to wine, I can fully appreciate the toffee, vanilla, citrus, smoky, flowery and what other notes have you; no such luck with whisky.

But then, at the risk of sounding absolutely snooty and highhanded, I suppose you have to be at a true blue Scottish Highland Single Malt distillery and be offered a tour and tasting by their master blender to know why they worship single malt or why whisky is fondly called ‘liquid bread’.)

I had read about how seriously the Scots take their whisky but fully understood what that meant on two occasions. The first was when our fiercely Scottish tour guide in Glasgow, in a dramatic tone, as if he were reading poetry, sighed and pronounced whisky ‘the water of life’. And the second was when our trip coordinator who was half-Scottish, told us how her sister’s great love for whisky was jokingly attributed to her mother filling her ‘doodoo’ bottles with single malt instead of milk when she was a toddler. ‘But jokes apart, Scots get a first taste of whisky quite early,’ she said.

The charming Glengoyne Highland Single Malt distillery

The charming Glengoyne Highland Single Malt distillery

At the Glengoyne Highland Single Malt Whisky distillery, north of Glasgow, where we were in for a distillery tour and a master blending session, 1.1 million litres of highland single malt whisky are produced every year. I had a taste of the fine stuff as soon as we reached the distillery as we were greeted with a small glass each on arrival. It was super smooth, subtle yet full of flavours, which I am not connoisseur enough to describe in precise adjectives here and certainly the most fantastic thing you could be offered to warm you up on a typically cold, grey and rainy Scottish morning. Must pick up a bottle from duty-free for dad, I thought.

The distillery, which is known for producing the world’s best highland single malt whiskies, needs about 100 litres of water to produce just one 750 ml bottle of this special whisky. For any whisky to qualify as single malt, it needs to be produced in one distillery and aged for a minimum of three and a half years in oak casks, among other things. Glengoyne’s youngest single malt is aged for 10 years and they use special European red oak casks that have previously held sherry to draw in its colours and flavours into the whisky as well. A blend of single malt and several grain whiskies (which don’t have a production method as stringent as single malt) from different distilleries is what is called a blended whisky. This has a much lighter flavour than single malt.

My very own blend of whisky, Glenraje

My very own blend of whisky, 'Glenraje'

Now single malt may be valued much more for its rich, pure flavour and complex characteristics as opposed to a blended whisky, but that does not really make money sense for the distillery. While a bottle of blended whisky costs as much as 10 pounds in the UK, single malt costs upward of 25 pounds. Glengoyne’s 10-year-old single malt costs 71 pounds or Rs 6,000 and their 40-year-old costs 3000 pounds, which is about Rs 2,40,000 (hmm…must abandon plan of gifting dad a bottle).

There just aren’t enough people buying single malt as there are buying blended whisky. As the master blender at Glengoyne tells us, only 20 per cent of their single malt is bottled and sold. The other 80 per cent is just sold to blended whisky distilleries. That’s where their profits come from.

Blending single malt with several grain whiskies is a complex process as well. The master blender really has to know the characteristics of the whiskies well before he/she decides which flavours are best married in a blend. And that’s what the master blender’s session at the Glengoyne distillery takes us through.

We mix 60 per cent of single malt with 40 per cent of our choice of four grain whiskies. I choose the grain whiskies based on the flavours mentioned on each of its labels and a fair amount of sniffing and tasting happens before I decide on the varying amounts of four grain whiskies that make up 40 per cent of my blend. I am partial to the ones with the apples, vanilla, toffee and fruit notes and I ignore the ones high on the cereal, oak and smoky flavours. I carefully bottle 200 ml of my blend into a tiny bottle, which I label carefully with my surname prefixed with ‘Glen’, as is tradition.

The bottle even has a dainty, blue ribbon tied on its neck. Perfect memento for dad. As the folks at the distillery tell us, Scottish single malt has the flavour of the land, with oak, sherry and even the scent of the wind in it.

It’s a whole country in one glass.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (5 votes, average: 4.4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • jasneet

    i will be waiting eagerly for next post………………on ‘liquid bread’

    [Reply]

    Sai Reply:

    Thanks for the high spirited reply, Jasneet. :) You seem like a single malt buff.

    [Reply]

    jasneet Reply:

    sounds really interesting

    [Reply]

  • http://debashisgupta.rediffblogs.com Deb

    Souds interesting. Though I’m more of a wine person, would love to know about the joys of single malts (haviing tried only blends till now). Maybe even give it a try, someday

    [Reply]

  • http://www.gocubans.com/ Harry Wood

    In America they prefer Blended than Single malt because of its cost, consistency in Aroma,flavor etc. But Single Malt sounds interesting. Some of the Single Malt whiskeys are kept for 40 years. The taste must be amazing. Hope to get the taste soon.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.royalhabanos.com/ George Allen

    Yes i agree with Mr. Wood that we love Blended whisky.It is a product of mixing one or more single malt whiskies together with other grain whiskies or neutral grain spirits.Scotland, Ireland, and Canada are the most common countries of origin for blends. The blended whisky has its significant aroma,taste and strength. It is comparatively cheaper than Single Malt whisky.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    I think Anil Kapoor is simpleton about nature of man. His observation of rich of western countries and poor of India is superficial.Can anybody study deep deep unconscious mind of man.What man speak or tell in interview is mostly lie.Man id s hypocritical animal he never disclosed his true nature mostly he also don’t know what he want. He changes his mind moment to moment.In this circumstances how can anybody read the mind of others?

    [Reply]

  • Aditya Vikram

    Dude, you couldn’t be any further from the truth. It is his ‘unimaginative’, ‘ultra defensive’ leadership that got India the Number One Test Team status for the first time ever. Which other captain can boast of that. Its fickle fans like you that put India to shame. You are like rats that would jump ship at the first sign of trouble. If it wasn’t for His leadership you would still be dreaming of world cup wins….and hey comparing his records with other top order batsman is foolish, he comes at number 6 obviously his runs would be less than top order batsman. My suggestion to you – refrain from posting blogs when you dont know squat about the game.

    [Reply]

  • Rahul

    It’s interesting that the 2 comments reflect the antecedents of the commentators – big city vs small town boy. What’s lost is a dispassionate analysis of what ails the team. While Dhoni can’t be blamed for all that ails Indian Test cricket – he is the captain and must be held accountable if his current abysmal track record abroad continues for the next few tests. It is also true that we can learn from the Aussie experience of weeding out the aging superstars with journey-men who are young, athletic and want to win.

    [Reply]

  • M. DEKA/GUWAHATI

    I support your views. Cricket and poetry are not same thing.Cricket not only requires cricketing ability,it requires patience/coolness etc also.Dhoni is a cool captain. He might have got defeats,but his coolness and leadership are admirable.Oxford/Cambridge education hardly matters in cricket…………………………..

    [Reply]

  • cricket

    This writer has no clue as to what he is talking about. He dosent know the right end of a cricket bat from the wrong end

    [Reply]

  • Guest

    This is totally wrong. Dhoni in a nutsheel is doing what he is supposed to do, but the issue is that neither the bowlers nor the batsmen are handling their tasks well. In australia, when their pace bowlers can bowl us out twice in the match, we are struggling to even save runs. Our batsmen are too fragile there. We probably need to let seniors take some rest and show faith in young batsmen like Rohit, Raina and so on. I believe we have OK pace bowling attack with Umesh and Zaheer, but Ishant needs to be mentally strong. He can not bowl wayward all the time. He is not a newbie anymore. Irfan should be considered if he is consistently doing better in domestic cricket.

    Sacking Dhoni won’t do anything good. My 2 cents.

    [Reply]

  • Anhan

    so “anyone else” is better than Dhoni now….. wow…..

    [Reply]

  • IndianAussie

    Just a thought.. Shouldn’t the coach be making these analysis??? He surely isn’t at the matches as a spectator, may we should change the coach

    [Reply]

  • Proud Indian

    At last, someone is asking the right questions. Dhoni’s early successes as Test captain came mainly at home. His record outside the subcontinent is abysmal. I have a revolutionary suggestion. Remember, when SA were down and out (for different reasons), they appointed Graeme Smith captain and resurrected their fortunes. Make a complete rookie, like Ravichandran Ashwin or Virat Kohli (if he is able to seal his position in the Test team as a batsman), captain. The likes of Sehwag, Gambhir and Zaheer can guide the new skipper the way Pollock, Kallis and the other seniors helped Smith. What’s the downside? At worst, we’ll fail. But it can’t go much worse down six whitewashes in six games.

    [Reply]

  • Jo Kurian

    A wonderful article,; completely tru and to the Rght point !
    But my question is, especially ince you stated “anyone’…Who could be the next captain of Team India?!

    We obviously cant keep any of the Veterans in those shoes (or rather for how long).
    The next option of Ghambir? (Bad current form)
    Sehwag? (a personal No)
    Kohli’s, i feel too young, yet.

    i’m stumped!

    But excellent writing :)

    [Reply]

  • Sharma_r81

    Totally disagree. India has always axed its captains whenever it lost overseas… and it was always counter-productive. Lets instead face the truth. We suck in away matches. A green pitch makes us see red. We are tigers at home and mice away. So lets not blame only the captain. Lets look within and at the BCCI, which despite years of bitter experience has refused to make fast pitches on which our local teams can practice.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Our players can only be made to perform only if-
    1. BCCI fine them 100% of match fee for every loss (the players who underperformed)
    2. Ban underperforming players from playing in IPL.
    3. Ban underperforming players from signing any commercial deal.

    These guys don’t perform because they know money is raining for them in India in the form of IPL and ads.

    [Reply]

  • subby

    I am the first one to comment on this , and perhaps the author is correct in saying that glamour and gossip churns the spiritual India . If this was an article about cricket or bollywood there would be hundreds of comments by now . unless and until population control becomes a prime mandate the human beings shall continue to encroach the lands and cause extinction of not only tigers and leopards but native flora and fauna too. Darwinism truly plays out in India in it full glory , and it is the prime predator ” humans ” who shall win . The govt. has other things on mind , let us not always blame the govt., the people of India have no importance for these species amongst them , they rather travel the globe to Australia to see the Bengal tigers and leopards in Zoo’s . Funny I had a young Indian child at the Taronga zoo in Sydney say to his parents ” wow Australia has such beautiful Bengal tigers “

    [Reply]

  • aam aadmi

    vir sanghvi…. basterd congi stooge……

    [Reply]