Why I loved last week



I read four books last week that I absolutely adored.

The first was The Case of the Deadly Butter Chicken by Tarquin Hall, the latest in the series featuring Vish Puri, India’s most private detective.

I’ve been a fan of Tarquin Hall ever since I read To the Elephant Graveyard, an account of his travels in Assam with elephant experts; by now I think I’ve read every book he’s ever written, fiction and non-fiction, including the three Vish Puri books that I adored from the first. But I think The Case of the Deadly Butter Chicken is the best so far. There’s murder, moustache-stealing and match-fixing – and the case hinges on a part of our history that I am rather fixated on: Partition.

I’m a Sindhi, and I’ve always had a road not taken sort of feeling about the fact that I have never seen the towns and cities and villages of the place where both sides of my family have their roots. Not that I ever want to live there – from what I’ve read about it, it seems entirely the wrong place for a person like myself. Also, I rather like being Indian without a ‘home’ state – I can never be communal because the whole country is mine. I can never be Sindhi first and Indian after. When I define myself in terms of place, I’m Indian and my home towns are Calcutta and Bombay. I love the freedom of that.

But sometimes I wonder what I’d be like if Partition had never happened and I’d grown up in my parents’ home town, Hyderabad. Chances are I never would have lived there anyway, my dad is a Calcuttan born and bred who only ever went to Sindh on holiday with his parents and, I think, wasn’t very fond of the place. But I’d have been there at least sometimes, I’d have had a ‘home’ state, and I wonder how that would have shaped me.

(And often I think about the trip I made to Wagah in 2004, when I looked across a fence guarded on either side by very large men with very large moustaches, and saw no difference in the land. So much bloodshed and heartbreak and inhumanity and upheaval caused by that demand to put up a fence, but there is no difference in the land.)

In The Case of the Deadly Butter Chicken, someone remarks that no one really talks about Partition. The people who went through it almost never talk about it to other people and their own children and grandchildren. It’s something they’d rather put behind them. I noticed that myself, with my own families and family friends. As a child, the only references to it I ever heard came from my neighbours’ grandmother and a peripatetic aunt of my father, who travelled all over the country, staying for months at a time with one relative or the other because she had no home of her own. She’d lost her husband, home and many members of her own family because of Partition. But other than these two old women, and, of course, the stories in my Hindi literature textbooks, I never heard a thing about Partition, never connected it with myself, till I was much older and consciously seeking information, especially after I read Urvashi Butalia’s book, The Other Side of Silence.

Which made me very intrigued when I finished The Case of the Deadly Butter Chicken and moved on to Uncomfortably Close by Lily Brett, a book starring a highly eccentric (and I identified so much with her) middle aged woman, the daughter of Holocaust survivors. Lily Brett, when I looked her up on the internet, is the daughter of Holocaust survivors herself.

Uncomfortably Close is the second of two books starring Ruth Rothwax and her father Edek, both utterly delightful and adorable people. Too Many Men is the first book, but I read that second – I’d borrowed Uncomfortably Close and by the time I got to page 5, I knew I had to read everything by Lily Brett.

The odd thing is, though both books are about the same people, and the second book is built off the first, Uncomfortably Close is not a sequel to Too Many Men. In Too Many Men, which is about Ruth looking for her roots by asking her father to go with her to Poland, visiting the town where he grew up and Auschwitz and Birkenau, the concentration camps where he and Ruth’s mother were placed, Ruth is 43 and single and never wanted kids. Six years later in Uncomfortably Close, in which Edek decides to set up a restaurant in New York together with Zofia, a woman he met in Poland when he travelled there with Ruth, she’s in her early 50s, married, and has three grown up kids.

But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that these are both fantastic books, funny, simply written, with characters you can’t help but love. And for me, having just read The Case of the Deadly Butter Chicken, intriguing because Indians don’t talk about Partition, they never want to remember it and their kids (mostly) don’t know about it – or know much about it. But the kids of Holocaust survivors are just as damaged as their parents.

Is this a cultural thing, I wonder? Big Bazar showed us that we shop differently from westerners. Do we deal with unimaginable horrors differently too?

Finally, I read The Long Song by Andrea Levy, that tells the story of slaves in Jamaica from the point of view of a slave. I usually avoid books like this, what with my Partition fixation and Holocause fixation, I don’t want to know about MORE horrible things that people did to other people. But when I browsed through book, I was very taken with the writing – and I had to have it.

There was an interview with the author at the back of the book and she said exactly what I thought myself – that she hadn’t ever wanted to put herself through the trauma of researching what had been done to her people. But then she thought about it and realised that however abased they were, the slaves had lives and they had lived them, with ups and downs and humour and happiness and pain and hurt and grouchiness and that was what she wanted to write about. And that was what she did – very well. The Long Song is a breeze of a book. I loved it. Now I want more by Andrea Levy.

Four great books in one week.

Last week was wonderful.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Anonymous

    Sunitaji
    Read your piece. But I was looking for something more meaty. This was not good enough….. We would like to see how you read the current mood of UP. There is a new political dispensation, but the signals are confusing and there appears to be a sense of disquiet instead of deja-vu. The CMs office seems to tbe run by a cabal , the family members ,and Azam Khan.Each behaving like an independent authority. Do let us know yr views.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/kanikadhupar Kanika Dhupar

    You are cool……… really cool!

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Er… thanks, Kanika. The books are cool.

    [Reply]

  • masha

    I Love Love Love Vish Puri!!! Been trying to get my hands on the latest one but alas the neighbouring Time-Out has only The Man Who Died Laughing.. The descriptions of the idiosyncrasies of Delhiites are spot on.. I read and say “Totally seen something similar”.

    As a Bangal, I totally get what you mean about the Partition.. My paternal grandmother’s family had to leave their ancestral home in Bangladesh and come over to India in the middle of the night for fear of their lives. Nobody talks about how it was, mostly because not many are left who remember it. I also understand the absence of tangible roots as a probashi. Conversations are so awkward:
    Them: So where are you from?
    Me: I’m a Bengali..
    Them: Oh so you’re from Calcutta!!
    Me: Not exactly, I mean, I did most of my schooling there, but my parents are currently based in Ahmedabad..
    Them: So you stay in Ahmedabad?
    Me: No, I stay in Bangalore/ Chennai/ Delhi/ Mumbai (insert current city of residence)
    Them: *Cross eyed from all the info*

    But then I remember orchids have no grounded roots either and they’re so pretty, so rootlessness isn’t such a bad thing either.. :)

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Yes, that’s another thing, Masha. Bengal was partitioned too, but growing up, I hardly ever heard about it.

    And rootlessness can be lovely. So much freedom.

    Why don’t you order books from Flipkart or other online bookstores? There are great discounts and cash on delivery makes it so easy. Now that I hardly travel to Delhi any more, I’m dependent on Flipkart. The Bombay bookstores pretty much suck.

    [Reply]

  • Abhiroop Banerjee

    Big Bazar showed us that we shop differently from westerners. What do you mean?

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Before Big Bazar launched, they did an extensive study on how we shop. The study showed that Indians don’t like shopping in large areas with lots of space, they like crowded aisles (just like the narrow streets of bazaars) and like the jostle and bump of human contact, rather than open spaces. There was lots more that was different from the west. I read this study in a McKinsey report and I was fascinated.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001904292850 Raj Singh

    Dude well written and good research work.

    [Reply]

  • Cheryllne

    Thank you for this timely piece. Exquisitely and thoughtfully written.

    [Reply]

  • Akash Satyawali

    I really don`t understand what was meant to be conveyed by the article. Let me start with the last line where you say, it took the nation to handle those terrorists, and the price was paid by Bombay. You seem to toe the line of Shiv Sena here. And the part on the authorities should have informed the media o not cover it, didn`t the media have that sense? At places you narrate it like you were there present when everything took place. I mean what do you exactly think this is? A movie? Whatever happened should surely not be repeated, another thing that does not need to be repeated is an article as such. Just dont understand why people have voted it 5 on5, when other posts happen to be better.

    [Reply]

  • SK

    Hindsight is 20-20, which is what Vir is harping on. It possibly could have been prevented, as was 9/11, but that is an irrelevant question today. Today the question that needs to be asked is what has changed to prevent something like this from happening again? Is there better coordination in place between the intelligence agencies, and how fast is the reaction time once there is an intelligence input. What organisational changes are in place to intercept the next terror attack, whether home grown or from across the border.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/jyothi.shankaran.1 Jyothi Shankaran

    How true. So much information and nobody acted. What a shame! And we were acting as if we were taken by surprise! So, how did the govt come back to power in 2009?

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    It’s always easy to do post analysis and blame. Given the Indian geography, population composition, maturing democracy and very many other factors, it’s very difficult to draw certain strategies. We also suffer from enemy within, which make life even more difficult. It’s probably only the time which will make us more responsible in tackling such terror related problems.
    By the way lets also respect the fact that Bombay was renamed to it’s original name Mumbai. If journalist like Vir doesn’t follow the protocol, how do you expect ordinary people of India would?

    [Reply]

  • patriot

    You can not really say all failed Bombay on 26/11 but blame it on poor adminstration and police who is nothing but”Nikami”Please watch Farid Zakaria HBO made documentry on 26/11.Many of our problems are because of Congress party who has appeased all along muslims and that is why we have some enemies within.Corruption is another evil ailment which is part and parcel of Congress party and if you look honestly we have chaos every where.Surprisingly this party is winning again and again because of solid muslims and majority Christian votes.We need immediate change and new honest educated party otherwised we are doomed and there will be no end like Bombay carnage.After 26/11 our Government is doing business with Pakistan as usual like nothing has happened.

    [Reply]

  • raj

    ok, we had intel about this, but when polic start investigation, so called secular brigade will shout innocent slims harassed. when police hv proof of bombs, again secular brigade will shout, police don’t know about bombs, and even its a bomb it was not exploded. after explosion, what use in catching terrorist, when they work from pakistan, so we should improve relationship with pakistan to get culprits. you are alos member of this brigade , mr vir… stop this crocodile tears.
    its reading articles like this which makes me angry.

    [Reply]

  • Ramesh Kumar

    First of all ,instead of attack on Mumbai ,we must say it was attack on India.THe biggest tragedy of the nation is ,we talk as if it was a local incident.IT WAS NOT ATTACK OM MUMBAI BUT ON INDIA.
    Remember initial reactions of pm and other congress leaders.what happened after few months ,we were sending dossiers to pakistan.IS THIS THE WAY TO DEAL ATTACK ON SOVERGNITY OF A NATION.
    Media was playing its role.You could hear sentences like ,how fast life in mumbai became normal.What do we expect from those who are not dead,not to work ,not to eat or live.
    People after cremating even their dear ones has to become normal.
    I feel sad on whole approach.

    [Reply]

  • KSAM

    I am sad to read the story and he is right that our force could save the people but i think this was a planned attack on Mumbai and some big shots were involved. in one sentence i will say This was happened to eliminate The Great Karkare the ATS chief.For this shameful attack we will blame our Leaders(Both from congress and BJP RSS ShivSena) those are selling the country for their selfishness.At that time where were our bravo Shiv Sainiks those say they are nationalist.

    [Reply]

  • Asifiya

    We can expect this from our politicians but Muslims who call Islam a religion of peace can carry this massacre of civilians in name of Islam is more shocking. Besides 26/11, Mumbai has been hit many times by terrorists- all Indian Muslims- acting in name of Islam. This is something we need to debate as well.

    [Reply]

  • http://twitter.com/aumshanti1 aum shanti

    veer sanchvi is kayar sanghvi who is anti national congress’s paid anti national who is hired by hindustan times to get more advertisements

    [Reply]

  • patriot

    Why telling all failed Bombay on 26/11 when it was adminstration and “Nikammi”police responsible for it.But our Government is doing business with terrorist country Pakistan as usual like nothing happened on 26/11 and LeT is now threatning to attack on Vishno Devi temple in Jammu.Untill and unless appeasement by our Government will not stop to muslims we will be always in trouble.It was big mistake to keep muslims after partition.Please see documentry on Mumbai terror narrated by Farid Zakaria and produced by HBO.

    [Reply]