Talk to the Hand



I’ve had a cough for more than a month now. A nasty hacking cough that, when I go into a paroxysm, sounds as though I’m going to die on the spot. I’ve been to three doctors to figure this out and have taken so much medication that I’m convinced I’m the sole stay and support of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Yet the cough clings to me like a limpet.

So last night I threatened it with the worst. Listen, you nasty lump of congestion, I said to it, wagging my finger sternly. If you’re not out of here in the next 10 minutes, I’m going to charge you rent. Bombay-ishtyle, complete with brokers’ fees, stamp duty and hours and days of standing in line to get the lease registered. That’ll teach you, you dirty little squatter. Space comes at a premium in this city and don’t imagine you’ll get it free.

And after that lecture, I felt better. Really. I didn’t even cough for the next 10 minutes. That showed that the nasty lump of congestion was taking me seriously, I thought triumphantly. And then of course I started coughing again and sounded as though I was dying and all as it had been before the lecture.

Now, of course I didn’t expect the nasty lump of congestion to actually listen to me. (For one thing, I don’t think nasty lumps of congestion even have ears.) But I’ve realised – partly thanks to this blog in which I tend to ramble to not much purpose, which means that I pretty much talk here the way I do in my head – that I have a habit of talking to animals, inanimate objects, natural phenomena (such as the climate) and, in this case, a nasty lump of congestion, just as though they were people I could have a conversation with.

This confession could well send me into the nearest loony bin even without a doctor’s certificate, but I don’t care. It’s fun talking to animals, inanimate objects, natural phenomena (such as the climate) and even a nasty lump of congestion. Aside from the joy of coming up with inventive combinations of expletives if necessary (such as I cannot mention on this blog – but I wish you could have heard how I ticked off that nasty lump of congestion, that was a doozy), these conversations happen in my head, so no one knows how eccentric I really can get. And finally, but really importantly, animals, inanimate objects, natural phenomena (such as the climate) and, in this case, a nasty lump of congestion, cannot talk back. And that is perfect when you’re being stern.

I don’t know when I started holding these conversations with non-people. Possibly during a very lonely period in my life some years ago when I was in one city and most of my friends were in another. Most likely though, I’ve always done it and just never noticed it.

I figured this out a few weeks ago when I was patiently explaining the art of using commas to an intern and I told her to read the sentence aloud and place the commas where she automatically stopped to draw a breath.

After she left, I thought about what I’d told her and realised that when I read, it’s not just that my eyes scan a page. I actually hear the sentences in my head. It’s like I’m reading aloud to myself.

I don’t know if this is the case with other people when they read, but with me, there are definitely voices in my head. From that to having conversations with non-people – well, really, I’m just thinking aloud though it’s all happening in my head.

Do you do this too?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 3 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Anonymous

    It’s amazing that Sujata has not written a single word criticizing Congress… This is what is called classic case of paid journalism.

    [Reply]

  • http://twitter.com/am_i_akshay Akshay Shetty

    a very well written piece. i am amazed at ur bravery to pen such contentious articles. but i along with many other readers have placed my trust on u. please don’t disappoint us

    [Reply]

  • Abu Ahmed

    Anna did a great job – that of crystallizing public anger into a movement against corruption. The later political part played by Team Anna is of course unacceptable in a democratic and parliamentary set-up. Therefore, he was defeated politically and should now retire to his village – however, Indians do owe a great thanx to Anna.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    ” VERY WELL RESEARCHED & DARING PIECE, I SALUTE YOUR VALOR & INTELLIGENCE IN BRINGING OUT THE TRUTH ABOUT ANNA !”

    Now you may not mind sharing the booty you earned for writing this piece.

    [Reply]

  • ashok

    To use a phrase much favoured by food writers, Sujatji’s sources are to die for.

    [Reply]

  • abhiji

    “From what I understood, the RSS and the BJP were the ones who had decided to put Anna in his place:”
    Great job. Shooting two birds with one stone.
    I am surprised why the congress is so pleased that the movement against corruption seems to be fading, and the lokpal bill is stalled again! In my mind;

    This government cannot, simply cannot, pass a strong lokpal bill and lose control of CBI. If that happens, all the skeletons will fall out of the closet. Starting with the Great Bhopal Gas Tragedy, where 30000(?) Indian lives were traded for a few pennies in Swiss and other foreign banks, to Bofors and Quattrochi, to a scam a day today, when Billions of Dollars of Indian Tax Payer’s money is being deposited in Swiss and other foreign banks by sick(?) worthies going on foreign travel tours covered by official secrets act and coming back healthy when their job is done, all these skeletons will fall out of the closet. Where will the Queen hide then? It is the duty of all her minions to protect the Queen. No, this government cannot, simply cannot, pass a strong lokpal bill and lose complete control of CBI in the process.

    Long live Anna!

    [Reply]

  • anil

    Try this and do a test. Put Sonia, Priyanka and Rahul’s nice pictures on HT’s front page for a week and see how it can work as repellant to drive people nicely away!

    [Reply]

  • Moro

    I hope there is a Plague in that city of amethi for supporting Mrs Maino and Mrs Roberts.

    Let them burn in helI

    [Reply]

  • Nair

    Ehat isn that they have done to Amethi and Rae bareily?. Don’t just priase then you immoral christain women

    [Reply]

  • masha

    Oh yes, the voices in my head.. Such lovely people they are, always ready for a conversation and never too nosy.. :) I talk to myself all the time, eliciting alarmed looks from bystanders who either see me laughing for no reason at all (Just told myself a good joke), or having animated conversations with myself.. Oh and have always been known to speak to dogs as if they are human.. :P
    I guess it comes out of a) having a rich imagination and b) being an introvert we much our world in our head, thus giving rise to dogs who speak back and the irritating lump of congestion.. :) Either way I love talking to myself (and my dog) and no amount people looking at me strangely will change things.. :)

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    Hooray! I’m not a loon. Or at least I’m not a loon alone. Thanks Masha!

    [Reply]

  • Kushal

    I suppose looniness will occur if these things start talking back, Sonali.

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/kanikadhupar Kanika Dhupar

    Yes, I have these conversations too. Though I feel miserable when I come up with a wisecrack, which refuses to occur to me at the right time.

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    I KNOW Kanika. So frustrating.

    [Reply]

  • Abhiroop

    I realised I do it when people on the street gave me strange looks, quickly averting their eyes when I turned to look at them. I’m training myself to talk with my mouth closed and hands still. I address all animals with one name only – moron. I also talk with characters from books and have been present in the Bastille when the King and his Queen were guillotined. I do not remember what I was wearing.

    [Reply]

    Kushal Reply:

    S’okay Abhiroop, I never remember what I wear anywhere either.

    [Reply]

  • sayaji

    We do not want medieval laws (Sharia or Manusmruti). We want secular laws with modern sensibilities. We need here simple amendments to CPC where by the law will fulfill its role as a deterrent of crime and the instrument of justice in the context of rape, and related attempt to murder, and the murder.

    [Reply]

  • Waltair

    The death penalty is not the patent of any religion. It is a hangover from medieval times in the minds of people who refuse to see that killing by any name is just killing. Religious mythology of any religion is just a story of good versus evil, relevant to a particular point in time. Don’t think that Hinduism is the only religion whose religious books are a myth. It is not the degree of punishment but education and the surety of punishment that will stop it.

    [Reply]

  • engrich

    hakims are found only in india.medical report on rape is accepted.before most of cases woman used to lie.punishment is death so they were taking many witnesses.

    hindus have no lawsof their own.sharia is better than european laws.suppose if i kill somebody sharia has third option of financial compensation.in muslim world 25 lac is blood money many times victim accept this being more useful to family of victim.

    [Reply]

    shankar Reply:

    Plus blood money for non muslims is 1/6th of that of a muslim. So even in death, islam divides people as superior muslims and inferior kafirs. And u talk about division of society in hinduism!!

    [Reply]

    rao Reply:

    .blood money is same for everybody,hindu or muslim.sharia laws are cheap and practical.

    [Reply]

  • jainu

    we don’t need any religion laws.ammend hundred years old cpc . recruit more police personnel ,train the police with modern equipment ,more police training institutes,crime related course in universities ,upgrade police with latest technology, increase ratio of police,non interference of politician in crime cases,Effective policing,teach children in school about duty of a citizen instead of useless histories,harsh punishment like life sentence with out parole,treat rape as non bailable offence .All this will reduce the crime rate.Media should always give maximum importance about rape issues

    [Reply]

  • Sumit Bose

    @kanishka, it is such a futile wasted effort to make any Islamic nuthead see any reason.
    “kutte ka dhum, sau saal seedhi naali meh rakhkar nikala, toh dhum thedi ki thedi hi rahegi.
    These Indian converts in a total denial mode, they do not want to admit that it was one of their ancestors who was brutalized into “honouring himself” by submitting to Islam of the muslim conquers, and have created this inverted myth of Brahminical “oppression” to deflect from the capitulation of their own ancestor and the vapidness of a fake Arabic identity, only to get “kicked” by the Arabs.
    Sadly, their ancestor had no choice, but, this dimwit has no brains., and whatever is there is only with a Don Quixotic hate of the Brahmins. Engrich Mia, i am not a Brahmin, but if i have any issues with Brahmins, i would like to resolve it as an Indian, I wont wear the garb of a Pseudo-Arab to pick issues with a Brahmin.

    [Reply]

    rahmat Reply:

    tum gadhon ko sivaye hafiz saeed aur daood ibrahim ke ata kya hai.
    bose hinduism is mother of apartheism.conversion is liberation even mnroy and vivekanand gave call to suppressed to india to embrass islam.
    you are kayasth means that u are illegetimate offpring of brhmns.u bstrds are talking big.

    21 century mein cow and penis par apna sar patakne wale humko ratsa dikhate ho.
    u people are gang of idiots.nothing more.
    sharia will chage india.

    [Reply]

    Sumit Bose Reply:

    @rahmat, a very interesting “Freudian slip”! 1slam cannot be “embrassed” anymore, than by its own intrinsic vacuousness. My simple suggestion to any of these fired up 1slamic nutheads is to read the texts in a language that you can reflect upon the stupidity contained within, leave aside the mountains of absoloute balderdash and brutality proscribed as the path to attain 72 virgins, 23 pre-puberty boys and 80,000 servants.
    One is wary of the power of the sharia, right from Morocco to Malaysia, we have enough of Nobel prize Laureates, progresses in sciences, technologies and culture to want that to be set upon other sections of humanity. I cannot agree more with you when you say “Sharia will change India”; India will sink southwards as Pakistan and Bangladesh are scraping the lower depths of the barrel.

    [Reply]

  • Arjun

    There are strict Hindu Vedic laws that applies against incest and rape against women. The problem in India is politicians does not enforce laws strictly and do not punish criminals harshly like in the U.S. These problems can be solved without Shariah, there are more modern and better laws than Shariah. India has a secular democratic constitution that takes precedence over any religious laws. In Muslim countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan women are being killed and brutalized everyday and there are no protests. Atleast in India I see mass protest against such heinous crimes.

    [Reply]

    rajeev Reply:

    There are strict Hindu Vedic laws that applies against incest and rape against women

    can u tell me what are they.far more women are killed in india than anywhere in west.hindu religion is slavery have no laws.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Vedic religion came first.Buddha himself was Kshatriya.Ashoka was HIndu before converting to Buddhism.

    [Reply]

  • Ehsan

    abey Ch**ye pehle tujhe ye pta hona chahiye k sharia law na pakistan mein hai na Afghanistan.

    [Reply]

    Kaffir Reply:

    Send these pigs to where they belong…Pakistan ya Afghanistan

    [Reply]

  • Gladtide

    u nomad doughtier rapists, muslims rulers built magnificent monuments, roads, markets and cities,,,In united currptstan there is no place for justice!!!

    [Reply]

  • Moo ham head

    When americans shove a danda up the *** of mullas n took away raymond davis even when whole porkistan was yelling to hang him,real usefullness of saria came to be known.They paid them blood money n took their man even when he shot 2 porkis in broad daylight.

    [Reply]

    engrich Reply:

    at the end they have eaten shit in afghanistan and bited dust in iraq.

    [Reply]

  • http://twitter.com/macgupta123 Arun Gupta

    It turned out the death penalty for kidnapping made the kidnapper more likely to kill the victim – minus a witness, for no extra risk. The same holds true for rape.

    [Reply]

  • Roy

    @ sha.. few days ago a person was burnt alive in Pakistan as fanatic mass thought he has burnt Quran.

    [Reply]

  • san

    Muslim in India must govern with muslim law related to criminal law also as in case of personal law.

    [Reply]

    shankar Reply:

    better they can move to pakistan and get all laws as per islam.

    [Reply]

  • shankar

    come on.. u mean the koran is not the book for eternity? and that things as per koran will not work in modern times?? U must be cut into 100 pieces and ur mother and sisters should become muhammad’s property with immediate effect. *******, how dare u refute our peaceful religion? We will murder u and ur family… LOL

    [Reply]

    rao Reply:

    things like this is not mentioned in holy quran.these are social laws.u hindus are bunch of jahils.only know hafiz sayeed and daud ibrahim.

    [Reply]

  • shankar

    If india is a country of idiots, u can move to any wise country that u think will accept an idiot like u

    [Reply]

    engrich Reply:

    why not to correct u donkeys.we are part of india like u.

    [Reply]

  • Harsh

    Mr Zia Haq – you have proved you have Jihadi mindset. Death punishment for rape is not islamic invention, used to be there in Indian society earlier. You wouldnt agree to it, I know.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Imagine if Sharia laws were applied on Mohammad, that guys would have reduced to pulp by stoning for 9 crimes that he committed.

    [Reply]

    engrich Reply:

    so son of a ***** u are back again.i thought u died.

    [Reply]

  • momn doter

    You may be a muslim, but you definitely are not Indian. Hi ****.

    [Reply]

  • rao

    be more particular.things in islam changes with time.

    [Reply]

  • rajshekhar

    3000 years of vedic period was the darkest period of indian history.doors of schoolsand knowledge were closed to 99.5%of indians.
    logon ko jahil rakh ke bhawan bechte the.gareebon ka khoon chste the.yahee tumhara karnama tha.
    u people are curse for india.

    [Reply]

  • ehgrich

    muslims built thousands of libraries and universities.alazhar was built 500 years before oxford.oxford and cambridge started as madarssa or religious seminaries books to make them scientific universities were brought from muslim spain.books were wrtten by muslims of spain.
    u are illetrate person fed on rss propaganda.read bagdad library. libraries in cordoba spain with 1 million books.
    did u ever produce anybody equal to ibn sina ,ibn rush omar khayyam etc.algebra alcohol alkaline are all arabic words.
    u are simply jahil and person full with hate.

    [Reply]

  • Sumit Bose

    @Rahmat, I appreciate and value your “truthfulness” in writing the statesmanship of Akbar. It was after he let Raja Maan Singh take control of the battle against Ahmed Shah Abdali, and its ensuing victory; and the statesmanship with which Raja Maan Singh brought the smaller kingdoms under Akbar’s rule by negotiations, that Akbar began the non-partisan role he was destined to play to perfection: A nation builder!
    Because it was the first time, India had a ruler in over 4 centuries who treated all subjects equally, Akbar was very deeply into Chanakya and his Arthshastra. But, that is a facinating and large topic, when Indians felt they were equal and were assured fair taxation, peace and security. Jahangir continued Akbar’s policies unchanged, infact advanced equality to the hilt, because he was a “legal eagle”.
    However, while taxation and superficial equality were yet maintained, the Islamic agenda resurfaced with virulence during Shah Jahan’s regime.
    Had Dar Shikoh been able to defeat Aurangzeb in the tussle for the throne, the Mughal narrative would have a totally different flow. Dara was a devout Hindu and had translated the Ramayan on his own handwritten copy for his children.
    He would have held the empire with the same glue that Akbar had; but Jahan Ara’s (Shah Jahan’s daughter) curse on Aurangzeb rang true and Aurangzeb saw before his own death the empire crumbling away.
    However, that does not mask the fact that these all, right from Mohamad of Ghori till Tipu Sultan were all agents with an Islamist agenda, (with the exception of Akbar and Jahangir), they had Turkish spoken in the palaces, Persian was the court language, and they created a pigdin language called Urdu (Turkish word Ourdh= military camp).
    I would suggest you to read a very well researched and documented book called Islamic Jihad by M.A. Khan, if you are a seeker, your inner eyes will awaken. M A Khan has painstakingly translated from the recorded chronicles of Mohammad of Ghori, each of the Slave Dynasty scoundrels, Baabur (baabur namah, his own chronicles), right down to our great “Freedom Fighter” Tipu Sultan, how much brutality was borne by Indians at the behest of these scum-bags and their mercenaries.
    The legacy of that reverberates even today.

    [Reply]

  • peace

    All those non muslim brothers kindly save your skin for the day of judgement. Don’t pass hatred remarks. You have no knowledge about peaceful islam. Read and learn religious literature before leaving hatred comments.

    Brother Zia is writing very honest and truthful piece.

    [Reply]

  • peace

    The sunnah of islam teaches lots and lots of patience which perhaps none of us possess. Specially internet surfers!!!

    [Reply]

  • peace

    I repeat God’s punishment is severe. Don’t forget muslims and non-muslims brothers n sisters we are living in this world for a very short period and soon we all have to say good-bye. The day angels of death appear at our doorstep, our properties and other possessions will be taken away by someone else.And we all are transferred to another world forever!!!

    [Reply]

  • peace

    The holy quran says every soul shall have a taste of death. So pls fear your lord and do your best in this short span of time.

    And those who have misconception about islam and rights of women in it. Kindly read the last sermon of our last prophet(pbup)

    [Reply]

  • peace

    For your knowledge i m dispatching few quote:
    “….O People, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to
    your women, but they also have right over you. If they abide by your
    right then to them belongs the right to be fed and clothed in kindness.
    Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners
    and comitted helpers….
    Remember, one day you will appear before ALLAH and answer for your
    deeds. So beware, do not astray from the path of righteousness
    after I am gone…
    Hurt no one so that no one may hurt you. Remember that
    you will indeed meet your LORD, and that HE will indeed reckon
    your deeds…
    O
    People, NO PROPHET OR APOSTLE WILL COME AFTER ME AND NO NEW FAITH WILL
    BE BORN. Reason well, therefore, O People, and understand my words which I convey to you. I leave behind me two things, the QUR’AN and my
    example, the SUNNAH and if you follow these you will never go astray.
    All those who listen to me shall pass on my words to others and those to
    others again; and may the last ones understand my words better than
    those who listen to me direcly. BE MY WITNESS O ALLAH THAT I HAVE
    CONVEYED YOUR MESSAGE TO YOUR PEOPLE.”
    -Prophet Muhammad(PBUH)

    [Reply]

  • concerned indian

    wow seriously ..more word count that the article itself.. chiill out man.

    [Reply]