For Vignesh – The Catch-22 Review



Vignesh, an occasional commentator on this blog, mailed me last night. The subject line on the email said “Hi! Book review please!” which intrigued me no end. So even though I was 99% asleep (I was completely exhausted yesterday for some reason and turned in for the night at 10.15pm like a Very Good Girl), I read the mail which said: “I just want to know your opinion on the novel Catch-22 by Joseph Heller. I am pretty sure you have read it…”

I was really tired, so I didn’t respond, but I did have the energy to grin for a second before falling asleep. Because I have read the book – but I read it only a couple of years ago, even though we had a copy at home from the time I was a kid.

Catch-22 was one of my sister’s favourites and when I was a kid, I generally read whatever she recommended (now it’s the other way round, hee hee!). But when I tried it, I couldn’t make sense of it at all – I think I was too young for it then.

By the time the book would have made sense to me, I’d read M*A*S*H (yes it was a book – in fact a series of books – before it became a TV show), which is pretty much on the same subject – the lunacy of war and bureaucracy. So I figured I didn’t need to read Catch-22 and I didn’t.

A couple of years ago, however, I decided I may as well read it. (It helped that I had nothing else to read at the time.) So I did – and just fell about laughing.

It’s a hilarious book. American airmen during World War II had certain rules to work with. If they were declared insane, they would be taken off duty and sent back home. But if they declared themselves insane, that proved they were capable of rational thinking, which proved they were sane and so they’d have to continue to fly. On the other hand, everyone knew that if they kept flying in those terrible conditions, they’d have to be insane. That was the clause called Catch-22.

It’s best to read this book at leisure – when you have the time to read more than a few pages a day – because it can get confusing at times. Also, once you get into it, it’s very hard to put it down, which means that you’ll be jumping up and down in frustration if you have to keep dashing off and doing something else.

But even if that means putting off reading it till you get a two-day weekend or something better, READ IT.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100003563439127 Vignesh Here

    Honoured…Delighted :) )))))…. Thanks a ton :)

    [Reply]

  • purushu.com

    true!!! most garments on ramp suffer a major fitting scare. the ones that are constructed well lack individuality &originality. if the quality of the shows improves, buyers will automatically come back to their seats bidding goodbes to holidays!!

    [Reply]

  • Anil Chopra

    Having been part of the fashion week’s journey over 12
    years, my comments; Lakmé India Fashion Week (LIFW) started in year 2000, prior
    to which there were no fashion weeks. LIFW met with a huge response from
    designers, buyers, media, sponsors and end customers of fashion products. LIFW
    for 6 years was held once a year rotating between Delhi & Mumbai. By 2005
    it gave an opportunity for 35 shows with 50-70 designers showcasing. Most
    designers were established names showing year after year, with little
    opportunity for new & young designers. Talent consisted of 32 models, 3 choreographers
    and 3 makeup artists along with 100+ buyers & select media attending. The
    event became a rich source of sponsorship revenue for FDCI. With interest in
    fashion rapidly spreading across the country, the event did not provide
    adequate opportunities for designers who wished to participate, particularly
    the younger and emerging ones.

    Lakmé Fashion Week (LFW) was launched in 2006 at Mumbai.
    Certain vested interests at FDCI saw this as a threat to its monopoly and
    employed many unfair means to stop LFW from succeeding. LFW and FDCI moved into
    two fashion weeks a year in keeping with seasonal requirements. Hence, from one
    LIFW a year it became four, two LFWs in Mumbai and two Wills – FDCI in Delhi.
    There was huge uproar created by ‘interested parties’ stating there was no room
    in India for four fashion weeks. This was proved to the contrary by the response
    to all four being immensely successful. Inspite of this, efforts continued to
    scuttle LFW, till the MRTPC verdict against FDCI and several senior designers
    supporting initiatives of nurturing young and new talent at LFW. The success of
    Gen Next shows at LFW has become a rich source of young talent which over the
    last six years has produced many an outstanding designer who compete
    effectively with the old stalwarts from the LIFW days.

    Between these four events it now generates opportunities
    for 200+ designers to showcase along with 100+ models, 8-10 choreographers and makeup
    artists, stylists and host of support talent such as set designers, lights/sound
    & music experts. The attendance from buyers across the country including
    small towns has multiplied with each event getting 200+ registrations. Media
    interest has been enormous, with 350 registrations for each week. This has
    attracted several sponsors too. From a ‘boutique’ event 10 years ago with
    limited potential, the LFW & Wills events have become an industry
    generating business and employment for many. This can be sustained, like in any
    other industry, when there is sufficient demand from end customers of fashion products
    across India.

    On the issue of new fashion opportunities or weeks, in a
    free and open market the end customer will decide whether it is a success or
    not. Already some have succeeded while many failed. The market place & end customer should be the one taking this
    call and no one else. Those using unfair means to stop a new initiative should
    look back into history! Anil Chopra

    [Reply]

  • vijay !

    I have only heard of malala from newsreports.

    She could be a symbol of hope of the hapless tortured woman of Pakistan and Afghanistan. The voice agaisnt the hopeless Sharia and the geder unequal Muslim personal law.

    I hope she comes out of the injury and takes on the mad fanatic Mullahas who want to convert the world and repress women into medieval ages.

    [Reply]

  • Faulitics

    Here comes another arabized idiot. There are just too many of these types for comfort.

    [Reply]

  • Faulitics

    What’s positive about a bunch of fanatics preventing girls from going to school and blowing up girls schools? Do you want such people where you live? Your brain seemed to be wired differently. Strange one.

    [Reply]

  • Faulitics

    Dude, Taliban are real and they are fanatical murderers. It needs courage to openly say things against them. This girl has a lot of courage. I would go as far as saying that this Pakistani girl has more balls than all the Pakistani males put together.

    [Reply]

  • Plumbline

    Jesus Loves the World………

    [Reply]