One Nos. Happy Person

The Second UPA

TURNING and turning in the charkha wheel
The falcon has the dove in its sight;
Things have come apart; the centre is losing hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon India,
The communal hatred is loosed, and is everywhere
The ceremony of intelligence is drowned;
The seculars lack all conviction, while the fundos
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely the revelation is not heeded;
Surely the Second UPA is now jaded.
The Second UPA! Hardly are those words out
When the image of an etherised PM
Troubles my sight: somewhere in the streets of Delhi
A shape with goofy teeth and a bhagwa choga,
A gaze dazling and scorching as summer’s sun,
Is showing its drag image, while all about it
Reel shadows of the impatient dogs.
The darkness covers again; but now I know
That sixty years of controlled climb
Have delivered India on the world stage
And now the regional beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Patel Chowk to be born?

With due apologies to WBY

[Reply]

India should not have a ‘president’. India is a parliamentary form of government not presidential. India is a poor country and cannot afford a ceremonial president and the expenses that go with this facade. Indian taxpayer should not be burdened with this additional nuisance.

[Reply]

Thanks for the “honesty” in outling the special “qualities’ of the people who occupied the august office of the President of India, particularly under the dispensation of the Gandhi “vansh”. We have seen a happy-chappie “broom-sweeper” to our current president whose special “X” factor to occupy this post was her being an ex-cook *** dishwasher (conveniently omitted by you ). So we have witnessed a fantastic new low in our public polity in the last 5 years, an ex-maid is the “supreme-leader”, an ex-cook-cun-dishwasher is the President and the come-uppance is that we have an University drop-out moron as the “hope of the nation”; please tell me, Mr Vir ‘Dalal’ Sangvi can even, any African or tiny Carribean or Pacific Islander nation top this. I wonder how this nation is even able to exist as an entity, in this 21st century, with such ‘leaders’ of sterling qualities?
Before I forget, there is something all ‘patriotic’ Indians have to celebrate, our beloved Italian ex-maid has been named by Business Insider , a couple of months ago, as the 4th richest politician in the world !

[Reply]

WHY THIS MADAM SPEND MORE THAN 200 CORES OF TAX PAYERS MONEY , LIKE U.K. AND U.S WE NEED LEADERS BELOW 50 YEARS SO THEY CAN THINK ABOUT A CHANGE ????????????

[Reply]

Well said ! I wish Cong faces the conclusion you brought the article to. It deserves to be there for the way the country and its resources are treated and mainly for the way PM’s job is reduced to by Sonia. The other day NDTV kept showing a scene where PM did not sit and he waited for Sonia to take seat and then he sat. Sonia was watching him with a look that almost showed what she was thinking….

[Reply]

Its just a game, they all targeting to manmohan singh http://allinallnews.com

[Reply]

http://www.poemhunter.com/dr-yogesh-sharma
Sir you are very true and described beautifully the fall of this office. Dr.Karan Singh’s candidature was opposed because they disdained about dr.Singh’s deep faith and knowledge in and about Hinduism. Left can support any caste and religious fanatic but cannot support a faithful and learned Hindu.Now this office has fallen all time law. Although after Dr.S.Radhakrishnan the country is yet to see a person of high stature as president of India. Now a candidate must have unflinching loyalty to Nehru?Gandhi clan. Now one must be approved by Sonia/ Rahul team. Second, he must be a Muslin or from minority sect or must have approval from Islamic hardliners. Third he must be a die hard supporter of quota based caste system or should be from SC, ST, OBC, castes. And last and the most important the candidate must not have faith in Hindu Sanskars. Due to these reasons no body thinks about good and patriotic citizens as President of the country. Now great sons of this country like Ratan Tata, Narayan Murthy, T.N.Sheshan, Gen.V.K.Singh, K.P.S.Gill, Prakash Singh, Gopalswami, Anil Kakodkar, M.S.Swaminathan, Shreedharan, Anna Hazare, Gopal Krishan Gandhi, Shri Ravi Shankar Maharaj, Meera Sanyal, Kiran Majumdar Shaw, Indira Nui, Shobha De, Chetan Bhagat, Arun Shorie, Jagmohan, Homi Kapadia, Soli Soharabji, Harish Salve, Upendra Buxi, Krishna Murthy, M.J.Akbar, Amitab Bacchhan etc., are automatically and permanantly out of race and even consideration due to their high merit and unflinchinh patriotism. Merit, secularism and patriotism are become curse in this country. So this is the high and right time that president and VP must be elected by the people directly like USA so that the best may be elected,

[Reply]

I have combined the two write ups. This is a story that must be probed. DAN BROWN is writing a book on the BLUFF OF KARBALA. A war that never took place between 72 versus 26 lakhs or 72 v/s. 30,000-. Hz. Husain Ibn Ali, Governor of Kufa, was killed by a Zoroastrian (who had converted to Islam after the conquest of Iran), and a Shia-t-e-Ali in the Governor’s Palace. TABARI wrote the fictional novel “Qatl-e-Husayn” in 300 AD (240 yrs after Hz. Husayn’s murder). Tabari based his fictional work on quotes from Al Mikhnaf, a confirmed liar and a vaudeville artiste., a daastangohe., who expired 60 years before Tabari’s birth. Let us presume Tabari wrote the fictional work “Qatl-e-Husain” at age 30., it means that Abu Mikhnaf had died 90 years back.

Muslims were united as a rock 200 years after the passing away of Prophet Muhammad.

It is after 3 centuries – that Mazen Del Velmi – the Jew – started Maatam.

It is from Tabari’s commentary that Salman Rushdie got his idea to write the “Satanic Verses”., because Tabari says., that while the Surah-e-Najam was being conveyed to the Prophet by Angel Gabriel., he felt some interference from Shaitaan !

Please note what Ibn Khaldoun had said about the murder of Hz. Husain @ the Governor House in Kufah ! “Husayn ibn Ali was murdered by his grandfather’s [Prophet's] sword”. Was he murdered by some of his own groups ? was he murdered by some staff member of the Governor house ? Who was JOSHAN ?

Selling Vinegar bottled as “Honey”.
- Ali Haider Nazm Tabatabai, Hyderabad Deccan.

Shia-ism is a revenge of the Iranians against Muslims for conquering Iran. Period.
“Truth has arrived and falsehood vanished” – (Holy Quran)
Fiction sold as truth or in other words Lies concocted :
1. Hz. Omar taking fire to the home of Hz. Fatima, leading to her assault and abortion. It is a lie. Hz. Ali lived for 24 yrs under the caliphate of Hz. Abubakr, Omar and Othman and he did NOT take the revenge ? He tolerated his wife’s insult and assault ? Amazing from the Lion of God !
2. Bagh-e-Fidak : Another lie. Hz. Fatima was not cheap enough to fight for a piece of land.
3. Karbala : Fictional Novel written 3 centuries after the murder of Hz. Husain Ibn Ali. Novelist : Tabari Ibn Hormuz (Zoroastrian).
4. Hz. Omar murdered by Abu Lulu, a Zoroastrian posing as Muslim (murder mastermind : Abdullah Ibn Saba, the Jew; with support of Iranian/Jew sleeper cells in Madina).
4. Hz. Othman murdered by Abdullah ibn Saba and his son (they subsequently fled to Yemen).
5. Hz. Ali served as Governor of Kufah, happily. After the murder of Hz. Othman by Saba`yees., he shifted the capital to Kufah (where he was already settled).
6. There was no Jang-e-Jamal. The war between Hz. Ali and Hz. Aisha is a bluff and fiction.
7. There was no Jang-e-Siffeen. The war between Hz. Ali and Hz. Muawiyya is a bluff and fiction.
8. Hz. Ali was murdered by Ibn Muljam (a Zoroastrian) Mastermind : Zoroastrians and Jews of Iran.
9. Hz. Hasan Ibn Ali served as Governor Kufah after Hz. Ali’s assasination. He left on health grounds (died of Tuberculosis) and settled in Madinah where he died a natural death. The story of poisoning by wife is another fake.
10. Hz. Husain Ibn Ali was murdered in the Governor House at Kufah by Joshan Ibn Hormuzan, a Zoroastrian. (Mastermind : the same group of Elitist Zoroastrians, Jews and Sabayeen).
11. Subsequently, the Zoroastrian Elite and Jews took revenge by inviting Mongols / Halaku Khan to invade Baghdad and destroy Baghdad.
12. The first casualty was Literature. All literature was burnt. (Abu Muslim Khorasani/Jafar Barmaki & Co. got active; role played by Nasiruddin Tusi, Astronomer)
13. New literature (Fiction) was produced and propogated. It is this literature that has reached down to us.
14. Tabari, a zoroastrian wrote the Karbala Novel (purely fiction). It is based on quoting Al Mikhnaf, a liar (and a stage artiste – a Daastaangoh ) who died 60 years before Tabari was born. In other words if Tabari wrote the Karbala Fiction Novel at age 30, that means Al Mikhnaf (his source) had died 90 years ago !!
SO, Shia-ism may be a religion (a mixture of Zoroastrianism, Christianity and Judaism with Arabic terms/names) by itself, but it is NOT Islam. It has got nothing to do with Islam. Shia-ism is a revenge against Islam. It is getting into Islam, taking Arabic names., and destroying Islam from “within”. Sabayeen succeeded in this endeavour.
Vinegar is being marketed as Honey. This is now exposed. Those who find the above wrong, may kindly devote time and research for themselves. They will reach the truth if they persevere.
THE TRUTH
GHADIR KHUM : Prophet had deputed Hz. Ali as his REPRESENTATIVE for purposes of TAX COLLECTION (Revenue). People of that area had not paid their taxes regularly. SO it was in THAT CONTEXT that he said, “Why did you not pay the taxes when Ali asked you for it (collection). I had sent Ali to do the job”. So that is the context. The trick is to make GHADIR KHUM the Last Speech (thereby diluting the Last Sermon delivered in Arafat). Ghadir Khum speech was fictionalised so as to compete with the Last Sermon at Arafat (that was made second last thru the trick, i.e.). Ghadir Khum is a bluff. It was uttered in that context. Prophet never gave an inclination that Hz. Ali was to be his successor. NEVER.
2. People forget that Hazrat Ali had 2 sons named : Usman Ibn Ali Ibn Abi Talib, and Abubakr Ibn Ali Ibn Abi Talib
!
Haqeeqat-e-Waqeya-e-Karbala – REAL STORY OF KARBALA
With due respect to all Muslims let us stick to truth.
Why ten days of mourning Muharram? It is well known fact that Shias started this custom of mourning Al-Husayn (maatam Husayn). Shia historian Justice Amir Ali (‘Mohammedan Law’ says, “founder and starter of Maatam-e- Husayn was Mazzal Dal Velmi a Shia in 352 A.H. (300 years after the incident)”. MAZZAL fixed 10 days of Muharram as permanent days for remembrance of the tragedy of Karbala. Shias today commemorate these 10 days of Muharram. Iraqi SABAAI narrators fabricated imaginary stories of cruel acts of horrific nature, like refusal of water and forced combats, which are not reliable and worthy of trust.
This is fiction. Pure lies akin to truth. In particular details about the date and days. The caravan of Husayn made a very long journey over a difficult route in difficult circumstances, could never have made it in a matter of 20-22 days time and reach its destination (Mecca – Karbala). Fabricators of the story of his arrival on the 2nd of Muharram of 61 A.H. did this on purpose to fabricate fiction for 10 days, which flourish with cruelty, refusal of water, battles and forced combats. The average speed of a laden camel, which is moving in the line of a caravan under normal circumstances, is two and a half miles per hour. Now to cover a distance of about 950 miles (Mecca to Karbala) at the speed of two and a half miles per hour and daily traveling for twelve hours on average would take at least 30-31 days. Departure of Al-Husayn from Mecca was on the 10th of Dhul-Hajj 60 A.H. (Ibn-Kathir) wrote: Husayn with his family members and 60 Kufic companions departed from Mecca for Kufa and the date of his departure was 10th of Dhul-Hajj.´Therefore, it was impossible for him to arrive at Karbala on 2nd of Muharram. According to truthful narrators Husayn reached Karbala on 10th of Muharram 61 A.H., which is acceptable. Thus it is obvious that purpose of fabricated narrations was to enable the narrators to present happenings in the colors and in accordance with their fiction. Nothing has aspired in these ten days, all these incidents are just imaginary stories and lies, then why do we keep Majlis´ in these 10 days of Muharram?
THE REAL STORY OF KARBALA : Husayn revolted against Yazid bin Muawiya and Kufis instigated him by supporting his idea. When Husain realized on his way near Kufa, that Kufis betrayed his cousin Muslim bin Aqil, he diverted the caravan towards Syria. On his way at Karbala, the Amir’s army halted him. Husain agreed to pledge to Yazid bin Muawiya.
60 Kufis who had accompanied Husayn saw their fate at stake, now that Husayn had changed. When Army approached them for their weapons, THESE Kufis attacked, and during this attack, Al-Husayn was killed (martyred).
This incident took place at Karbala when the caravan arrived on 10th Muharram and the fight was over in less than an hour. The claim of the Shias that Husayn was beheaded is a bluff. Husayn was buried with due honours and great respect and the Namaaz-e-Janaza was led by his son Ali bin Al-Husayn (Zeinul Abideen). So every thing was over in less that an hour ! Ibn Khaldoun has famously written : “Hussain was killed by the sword of his grandfather” (Prophet Muhammad!). What happened inside the Tent (Khayma) needs very deep research., esp. when the Zoroastrians destroyed all material along with the Tartars (Halaku and Changez). If Husain Ibn Ali was killed inside the tent.. some say after he agreed to give Bayah to Yazeed.. by the family of Muslim Bin Aqeel..).. A more reliable source says Husain, the Governor of Kufa was killed by a Zoroastrian Joshan Ibn Hormuzan., not in Karbala., but in Kufa.
The story of denial of water – fight for 10 days – burning of tents – is purely fictional and a bluff. There is no river/lake around Karbala. There never was any lake/river near Karbala for the past 5000 years according to Geologists.
(Matam : started by Maazal Dal Velmi 300 yrs after Husain!) – Syed Amir Ali, Judge Privy Council, and author of “Mohammedan Law”. The most prominent Shia Scholar !
[Baquer Majlisi, Author “Bahar-ul-Anwaar” was a student of Mullah Sadra, wrote a tome of lies. Allama Razi wrote attributed his articles to Hazrat Ali ! What a bunch of liars they were. They insulted Hazrat Ali by using his name and building a maze of lies and insults around his family to destroy the mission of Prophet Muhammad]. Shia means to Kill Ali and His Family and friends., then start beating the chest laying blame on someone else (Old Jewish Trick). Khud to Dawaat Phodi – Naam Aur Kaa bataya ? Shia means to destroy the mission of Prophet Muhammad., conquer Kabah and place new idols therein.

Shia-ism may be a religion, like Hinduism, Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism. That is fine and we respect the Shias for their religion. But Shia-ism has got nothing to do with islam. Shia-ism is a blend of Zoroastrianism, Judaism and Christianity with Arabic names thrown in for effect and confusion.

I challenge the Aghas of Iran and the Indian Continent to explain to me why the Book “Nabuwwa” is banned in Iran ? I want the Aghas to explain to me the work done by Abu Muslim Khorasani, Jafar Barmaki, Abdullah Ibn Saba, Nasiruddin Tusi etc. in the destruction of Baghdad, and in the destruction of the Muslim Solidarity. Explain to me the role of the above gentlemen and the work they did. But if you remain silent I will explain to you the dirty work they did.

Shia wants to do the same thing as Jews. Undo Prophet Muhammad’s Islamic mission of Tawheed and replace it with new idols (new designs of Lat-Manat-Uzza, in the form of flags, Panjetan Palm, and other symbols).

AGARCHEY PEER HAI AADAM ~ JAWAAN HAI LAAT-O-MANAAT (Iqbal)

[Reply]

Matthew 11:28
Then Jesus said, “Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest…………………………………………

[Reply]