New Vs. Old? No Contest



It began a couple of weeks back when, to mark Jerry Garcia’s death anniversary, I wrote a piece remembering my own dalliance with the music of Garcia and his erstwhile band, The Grateful Dead. For much of the next couple of weeks, I found myself delving deeper and deeper into music that I’d first heard decades ago. I fished out a DVD (a gift from a friend) of Blind Faith’s concert in Hyde Park in 1969; I rummaged through my music collection to look for Frank Zappa’s Hot Rats (1969); I found a New Riders of The Purple Sage album, The Adventures of Panama Red (1973) that I hadn’t heard in ages and so on. In other words, I turned retro. But it wasn’t too long before I was jolted out of my nostalgia-laden reminiscing by some astoundingly good new music.

Blind Faith’s DVD left me a bit cold (left); The NRPS album (right) I liked, but was it because most numbers were quick?

Actually, it was by a band that I’d never heard about before. Menomena are a trio from Portland, Oregon and have been classified by music critics as being an experimental rock outfit whose music they’ve compared to bands such as The Flaming Lips and Pink Floyd (not that I find much in common between the great sound of the Lips and the, well, er, sound of Floyd). But then critics like to pigeon-hole music and put stickers of genre, type and category on whatever they listen to — and sometimes that is just a part of their job. I’d like to describe Menomena simply as a band that you must listen to. Must. If you have, you know what I’m talking about.

Frank Zappa

Frank Zappa’s Hot Rats seemed stale

First, I don’t think anyone ought to even try to classify Menomena’s music. Although they’ve been around since 2003, I caught the trio’s music quite late, only very recently, really, when I came across their fourth album, Mines. At different parts of the 11-song album, Mines reminded me of different bands. Yes, there were whiffs of The Flaming Lips but there also was Animal Collective and, on some tracks, even minimalist blues bands.

More on that later. First, here’s a bit more about the band. Menomena’s Brent Knopf, Justin Harris, and Danny Seim use a self-developed software programme in the songwriting process (that doesn’t mean they don’t use conventional instruments, which they do). The computer programme, called the Digital Looping Recorder, which Knopf developed, enables them to pass a single microphone around among the three musicians, each of whom lays a track down using drums, guitars, pianos, horn instruments and so on. Each of these sounds is looped as the subsequent instruments are played and laid on the track. The three often swap their instruments and this, together with the looping recorder, says the band, keeps the songwriting process “democratic”. When you listen to Mines or any other of the four albums that Menomena have released, you can’t really make out whether a looping recorder programme has been used but I liked the concept of trying to make the songwriting process democratic.

But it’s the music of Menomena that makes it a band that you can instantly like. At least half a dozen of the 11 songs on Mines are about tortured or tormented love. The lyrics are honest, simple and intelligent and the vocals come straight from the heart. On TAOS, the band sings: “Oh I’ll bet I know what you like/ at least think I know what you might/ I’m not the most cocksure guy/ but I get more bold with every smile/ so please, show me your teeth, I’ll show mine/ I sure hope our P’s and Q’s don’t mind/cause I’ve been alone quite some time/ and I’ve got to scratch this itch of mine/ and I think I know what you know/ I’m not that smooth but I’m not blind.”

Menomena

Menomena have been classified by music critics as an experimental rock outfit, but, I’d describe them simply as a band you must listen to

For me, Menomena’s Mines was an escape from my relapse into retro oblivion actually. The DVD of the storied Blind Faith concert in Hyde Park that I referred to in the beginning was interesting to watch — particularly the first part (before the actual concert) where the back stories of each of its three super members — Eric Clapton, Ginger Baker and Rick Grech – was recounted but the concert itself seemed to lack passion and left me a bit cold. The Zappa album — although I played it a couple of times — seemed stale and old (well, Willie the Pimp and Peaches en Regalia brought back some memories of growing up in the 1970s but that was about all). The NRPS album I liked but was it because most of the numbers were quick and around just three minutes? I wonder.

Three to Tango

1.  Vampire Weekend’s White Sky: It gets a Basement Jaxx treatment to make it dancefloor friendly.

2.  ReverbNation: The website for artists and fans. AS good place to see what’s hot and where.

3.  Cassette tapes: Are they back? Here’s the LA Times take on what you thought was dead and gone.

Click here to follow Sanjoy Narayan on Twitter

Download PDF

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (2 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Shiva17

    Hi Sanjoy
    Definitely going to check out Menomena…!!!
    BTW have you checked out Eric Berglund’s project CEO,album’s called White Magic,its one great electro-pop album (a bit Vampire Weekendesque or Phoenix-sort of),great piece,all songs pack a punch.

    [Reply]

    sanjoy narayan Reply:

    I’m sure you’ll like Menomena. Thanks for pointing me to Berglund’s ceo project. shall try.

    [Reply]

  • Uttam Sirur

    Hi, have you checked out Bon Iver?
    Talking about old music, I’ve just got a copy of John Mayall’s The Turning Point and it’s still great (the lyrics aren’t, but that’s easy to forgive).

    [Reply]

    sanjoy narayan Reply:

    Yes, Bon Iver is great–both For Emma, Forever Ago and Blood Bank, the EP. I think I mentioned him in an earlier post. Thanks. also, Mayall’s Turning Point was great. I still turn to it sometimes. No drums but Stephen Thompson plays great bass.

    [Reply]

  • Ash

    Brilliant song, video, band – thanks for pointing them out!

    [Reply]

    Brigadier(Retd) Chitranjan Sawant,VSM Reply:

    AUM.
    dear Mr Sanjoy Narayan, Namaste.
    heartiest congrats on letting the Hindustan Times reach our Noida. Your personal not has indeed lent warmth that rain soaked Noida Nivasi need. Good show. Please keep it up. Just don’t let same matter be printed on two different pages like it was on page 13 and 15 today. I am an old reader of our paper and so do not mind my pointing it out, please.
    Here is an article of mine for your reading pleasure. Thanks. Chitranjan Sawant.
    _________________________________________________________________
    AUM
    MARINE CORPS COMMANDANT FAULTED OBAMA
    By Brigadier Chitranjan Sawant,VSM
    On return from an assessment of the ground situation of war in Afghanistan, General James Conway, the senior most General of the US Marine Corps gave a free and frank opinion. His bold and blunt statement said that President Barack Obama’s schedule of withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan probably provided sustenance to the Taliban rebel-terrorists. It was a blunt criticism of the strategy adopted by the President of the United States. The critic in public is no less a person than the Commandant of the US Marine Corps.
    PRESIDENT’S OPTIONS
    There cannot be two opinions about the supremacy of the President in matters military because he is the Commander-in-Chief of all armed forces of the United States of America. Nevertheless the President is duty bound to listen to the opinion of his generals who have war experience. The generals work with the troops in the war zone and are acquainted with the ground situation. What happens if the conduct of a general, professional or private, violates the code of conduct laid down by the Service Headquarters. Well, there are many examples from history that illustrate the point at issue. We may draw from anecdotes of military and civil clash both in British India and from the United States of America. However, before taking a peep into the history , we may recall that President Obama had forced another four star general, General McChrystal to go on retirement before time because his staff had made some critical comments on President Obama and his advisors that had found their way to the media.
    The national security advisor was called a clown in a light hearted chat at the bar in Paris after a few rounds of drinks had been served. President Obama was also butt of many an anecdote when the general in question found him feeling intimidated in the presence of the military brass and that he lacked focus while strategic issues of the Afghan war were being discussed.
    In view of this background the President has limited options open to him. He is not in a position to call General James Conway to the Oval Office and give a dressing down. General Conway is a professional soldier having 40 years experience behind him. He is professionally sound and knows what he is talking about. President Obama has no choice but to turn Nelson’s eye to the present situation. A confrontation is out of the question as the US Marines are heading the great push against the Taliban in Helmand and Kandahar. Any attempt to discipline the US Marine Corps Commandant at this juncture may be suicidal for the Obama administration.
    CIVIL MILITARY UPMANSHIP
    Calcutta was the capital of the British Indian Empire. Lord Curzon was the Viceroy. Lord Kitchener was the Commander-in-Chief of all forces of His Majesty in India. The war clouds were gathering in Europe. The Curzon-Kitchener tussle always made news not only in the Empire but in Europe too. The White Hall in London supported the two sparring knights by turns. The matter was referred to the constitutional expert Dicey. He opined that the Viceroy represented the King Emperor and was supreme in the British Indian hierarchy. The commander-in-chief was like a loaded revolver under the Viceroy’s pillow. The option was that of the Viceroy whether to use the revolver or not. That opinion, however, did not quell nagging doubts and there were feuds galore between the two. This subsided when both returned home one after the other.
    The American Civil War between the supporters and opponents of slavery was at its peak. General Grant was a successful strategist for President Lincoln. Someone complained about the General’s drinking habits. President’s retort was; Grant drinks but he wins wars. Thus the President nipped the trouble in the bud.
    General Douglas McArthur was the five star general who had accepted the surrender of the Japanese after the American atom bombs had destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He was immensely popular among soldiers and civilians alike. He was rather strong headed and stuck to his guns, come rain come shine. President Truman was rated a weak man in the White House who did not want to cross the Yalu river and take the war in Korea to mainland China, notwithstanding China siding with North Korea in a shooting war against UN, read America. General Douglas McArthur criticised the President’s policy as weak kneed and made his opinion public. President Harry Truman dismissed the five star general and ordered him to fly back to the United States from Tokyo, Japan. The general had little choice but to obey the orders of the President of the United States.
    General KS Thimayya, the Indian Army Chief had numerous tiffs with the then Raksha Mantri, VK Krishan Menon. In 1959 General Thimayya resigned in a huff. Although Pt Nehru, the then Prime Minister persuaded the General to withdraw his resignation appreciating his services in peace and war but eventually backed his bosom friend Krishna Menon. General Thimayya felt let down but swallowed the insult in the best interests of the Indian Army.
    PRESENT AMERICAN SCENARIO
    General James Conway, Commandant of the US Marine Corps is on a strong wicket and he sticks to his statement. He is telling the truth to his countrymen. There is a silver lining to the dark cloud. General Conway says that let the Taliban believe that the US forced would withdraw from July 2011 onwards. The Marine Corps units are going to stay on and keep on hammering the Taliban. The momentary morale raising of the Islamist rebels would take a severe beating when they find the Marine Macho men hammering them from all sides. The morale of the Taliban will be in their boots thereafter. It would be a strategic victory for the Americans and beginning of the end of the Taliban in Helmand-Kandahar region from where they had originated.
    General James Conway has clear cut views on the new policy of the Obama administration in letting gay soldiers make their sexual preference public. “Don’t ask, don’t tell”, if that policy is going to be rescinded and gay soldiers are permitted to practise their philosophy in billets, the General would not permit his Marines to share rooms with gay soldiers. Marines are macho American young men who should not be spoilt by gays and their ambience. Thus the US Marine Corps Commandant is a preacher and a practitioner of the old school of Military Thought where Truth and Honesty were the cardinal principles for an upright soldier.
    At the end of the day, it is the upright Marine General who has carried the military trophy by holding on to the motto : DUTY HONOUR COUNTRY.
    UPVAN 609, Sector 29, Noida – 201303, INDIA. Mobile : 0091-9811173590.
    Email : upvanom@yahoo.com and sawantg.chitranjan@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  • Brigadier(Retd) Chitranjan Sawant,VSM

    AUM
    SINO – INDIAN WAR OF WORDS
    By Brigadier Chitranjan Sawant,VSM
    Escalation of war of words between India and China is no reason for veterans in diplomacy and matters military to lose their sleep. None of the two sides is losing its cool and that is a welcome feature. Perhaps the ministry of foreign affairs miscalculated the likely Indian reaction when it said that the general Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Northern command of the Indian Army, Lieutenant General B.S. Jaswal would not be a welcome guest as a member of the Indian Military Delegation to China. The Chinese thought that India would take this rebuff lying down. India, on the contrary, reacted strongly and retorted by saying that the two officers of the People’s Liberation Army of China coming to India to attend the National Defence College would not be welcome anymore.
    THUS FAR BUT NO FURTHER
    Why did China do what it did? It was trying to send signals to Pakistan reaffirming its friendship with that failed state. Indeed it is for historical reasons that China developed friendly bonds with Pakistan when India and the Soviet Union were bosom friends. China and the Soviet Union had developed cracks in their friendly ties and China needed a friend in the Indian Sub-continent. Pakistan filled the bill as both had their bête noir named India. The two have remained friends through thick and thin. China, as an emerging super power, keeps on assuring Pakistan that the latter has nothing to worry and that it could carry on with its anti-India hostile attitude both in word and deed. It serves China’s interests too. India remains entangled with a minor country called Pakistan and cannot emerge into a global force to reckon with. Thus China will have no competitor in the Asian sphere. By making this pro-Pakistan and anti-India move, China has endeavoured to kill two birds with one stone.
    Is China interested in carrying on this war of words further? Is India interested in carrying the war of words forward? No, none of the two giant neighbours wish that this diplomatic tension and sending of a demarche turn into a border skirmish or a battle of books pouring over old treaties of the imperial era. Both the countries wish to resume their exchange of defence notes and continue military delegations visiting each other’s defence installations. The confidence building measures should continue.
    The basic reason for China to continue this detente is its emergence as a world power. Entanglement in a regional dispute with India may make a dent in China’s international image. Thus the present stoppage of visits by defence delegations is at best a comma and not a full stop.
    Generally speaking, China goes by past precedence and does not deviate from the policy adopted by it in similar cases previously. Not long ago, another Indian military delegation comprising, among others, then Lt Gen (now General and Army Chief) V.K. Singh. General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Eastern Command had visited China. Lt Gen VK Singh was in military command of Arunachal Pradesh, a territory that China has been laying its claim on. China had raised no objection then to Lt Gen Singh’s visit to China. Isn’t it a puzzle that China has adopted a different approach to the issue this time? The crossword puzzle is ipso facto solved when Pakistan enters the picture. China has undertaken the entire exercise to reassure its flood-ravaged friend that it need not worry about India and keep on denying visa to its relief workers and remain as hostile as ever. The aim is achieved and the exercise is, it is hoped, shelved now.
    IS AMERICA A PLAYER ?
    If anything is happening at a global scale, America cannot but take interest in it. America does not like its image of an international policeman but it has to be there lest China is acknowledged by the comity of nations as the giant among men. However, there is no evidence to prove that America has taken an active interest in the present Sino-India war of words. Indeed, it is an observer. It may ensure that the balance of power in the region does not tilt unduly in favour of China. One of the reasons of America pouring in military and financial aid into Pakistan on a massive scale is to prevent the terror manufacturing country from falling into the lap of China lock stock and barrel. One who pays the piper dictates the tune. When America pays green back dollars to Pakistan, it has a leverage in guiding its policies at home and abroad.
    Of course, India has to follow a policy in principle and in practice to prove to the world that it is not Pakistan centric. Further, India must stick to its guns and show to the world that China is incapable of browbeating her into submission. The present round of denial of visas to military officers by either country has proved the point to the hilt.
    MISSILE DIPLOMACY
    When China had deployed its Dong Feng-2 or CSS 5 missiles on the Tibet-Arunachal Pradesh border, many India and China watchers put out a theory that tension between the two great neighbours was at its peak. Fortunately, no international observer had predicted a shooting war between the two. In any case India had already deployed its Prithvi III, to cover a killing zone up to 350 Km and Agni II to cover a range up to cities in South China. The deployment of missiles should be seen in global perspective. China had to strengthen its alround defence by deploying its latest missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads. America had made a defence pact with its arch enemy of yester years, Vietnam and an old time ally Phillipines to make its presence felt in the South China Sea. Deployment of the latest Chinese missiles in Tibet on the Indian border should be seen in that context.
    Both India and China wish to resume their confidence building measures by holding joint exercises with officers and men of the three services of both the countries. Of course, the level of these military exercises should be raised from platoon and company level to brigade and divisional levels so that interaction between military personnel of the two countries grows at a higher level.
    One may conclude that God is in heaven ( notwithstanding atheistic belief of Communist China) and all is well with the world.
    UPVAN 609, Sector 29, Noida – 201303, INDIA. Mobile: 0091-9811173590.
    Email : upvanom@yahoo.com and sawantg.chitranjan@gmail.com

    [Reply]

  • vijay !

    Gr 8 cartoon!

    Makes u smile and makes u think. Well done

    [Reply]