Worst car of the year



As the dust settle on another busy year for the automotive industry, the jury would be out to decide on which is the best car of the year. But with car launches multiplying exponentially every year and threatening to outdo the number of movies made per year, surely not every car is worth the effort and investment of the manufacturer and consideration of the consumer.

That set me thinking on what possibly could be the worst car of the year. There are two ways to decide that. One based on where the product is at fault either in yours truly’s humble standards or compared to those that are present in its segment. The other is when despite being a good car, other factors like price or cost of service and spares have relegated it to the margins.

I have picked up 5 among a whole list of 3 dozen odd cars that were launched this year and I leave it to you to decide which one of them deserves the boot. Maybe in times to come we may as well institutionalize this aka Razzies to the Oscar.

Chevy Beat Diesel

Yes, it is the year of the diesel and yes this is the cheapest diesel hatch (barring Indica) in town. But I was never a fan of the Beat and though I had hoped the diesel variant would be somewhat likeable, I have been disappointed. With a small 1 litre engine that is tuned for higher fuel economy, this is one of the worst cars to drive at over Rs 4 lakh. The acceleration is sluggish, the engine noisy and the refinement so minimal that only an Indica owner will find reasons to smile in it.

To my mind, it is also priced on the higher side. If the intention was to build a car that is a diesel (hence lower running costs) and runs quite a distance for every drop of the fuel, one can overlook its other obvious vices. But by pricing it perilously close to the much bigger and better Figo, the Beat does not make for a very attractive proposition.

So far, it is no runaway success either but 2011 was a year when it was difficult for a diesel car to not sell. GM tried hard at giving us an exception though.

Ford Fiesta (New)

American car makers never flatter to deceive and if you thought GM was only an aberration, Ford makes it a rule. Just when the company with the blue oval was showing signs of getting its act right in India with the Figo, out comes the new Fiesta that is so reminiscent of the old Ford that India knew…..expensive, callous, out of sync.

Entering a segment that was the buzz of activity with the new Verna Fluidic, VW Vento and a City that was shedding its old arrogance of premiumness by slashing its price, Ford’s job was apparently cut out. Unfortunately they had a decent product but zero strategy. Pricing the car at Rs 8 lakh plus meant that it became dearer than even the City and clearly, the market had to reject it. Which it did.

The only new launch from Ford this year and it showed the more things change the more they stay the same.

Maruti SX4 diesel

Blame it on Maruti’s ill-fated labour strike at Manesar that restricted its ability to make SX4 diesels, but three phone calls to 3 different dealers in town proved that the car is not much in demand. In 2007, the SX4 was a bold move by the country’s undisputed small carmaker taking on the country’s most successful maker of premium cars. The drubbing that Maruti got from Honda then has affected SX4’s fortunes ever since.

The diesel version was Maruti’s attempt at capitalising on the industry’s fetish for the fuel. But tragically, beyond planking the engine beneath the hood it chose to not upgrade the car in any other way even when the likes of Verna and Vento had already upped the ante in the segment. Driveability, ergonomics, space, features, looks or value for money, it does not carry the honours on any parameter in the segment and that is the big letdown.

I dont know if the men are back, SX4 certainly isn’t. Not yet.

Tata Aria 4*2

The horror house of the Tatas launched many refurbished variants of existing products this year, but it is the Aria that makes the cut here….by some distance. For quite sometime, I always compare Tata cars only and only with other Tata cars. Because if we were to compare them with other brands, it would be like pitting a rotten apple with a fresh one.

So why the Aria and not the Indica EV2 or Manza or even the new Nano? For the simple reason that while the other cars may still serve some purpose….like being the lowest priced diesel cars in their segment, this one has no utility whatever. And even if it had, that space is not taken over forever by the XUV.

While the car itself is nothing to write home about, an unmatchable price of Rs 10 lakh plus proves beyond doubt what a big gap exists between consumers and the engineers at Pimpri. Because in between is the large army of Tata Motor’s marketing team that refuses to filter in any bad word about the cars to the factory.

So after an insipid experiment at making a global crossover in 2011, an opportunity to undo some of the damage by reducing price in the garb of a 4*2 version also goes abegging. Surely, one of the top contenders for this coveted title.

Maruti Kizashi

Another Maruti on the list and it does look a little unreal now. The Kizashi was another attempt by Maruti to branch out to the higher echelons of the industry. A car designed by Suzuki originally for the North American markets, it has failed badly everywhere and even with an uber aggressive price, there was hardly a chance of it striking gold in India.

Competing against the likes of Honda Accord, Skoda Superb, Hyundai Sonata and estranged cousins VW Passat, Kizashi does not have the refinement level nor the geekiness that surrounds a Rs 20 lakh car, the only thing going for the Kizashi is that it is really not a Rs 20 lakh car. But in India people sign 7 figure cheques not for the car but for the brand. And with a Rs 2.12 lakh M800 as a threshold, Kizashi fares the worst here. Which in effect explains why the Sonata too underscores.

Having sold a little over 300 cars in this fiscal so far, Kizashi sales are a third of the Accord and Passat and a sixth of the segment topping Superb. As Maruti had said at the time of the launch, it is an investment to study what sells in the higher segments. I hope they have learnt the lesson that Maruti does not…Can we have the Nano competitor now?

Which one of these do you think is truly creme de la creme….worst of the lot. Or is there some car that I have missed and which you believe is even worse. Vote and post comments or write in at sumant.banerji@gmail.com and lets mourn with the victor.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (26 votes, average: 3.54 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...
  • Shyam7310

    mercedes R class, vw jetta due to their pricing

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/naturerules Balaji Babu

    I am balaji from chennai. I own a beat diesel and I am not a previous owner of indica(i had a getz 2005). I can say the refinement is better if not best compared to a swift or micra.. but still even the polo’s engine has a clatter which is similar to beat and i dont find any difference between these two as far as the refinement goes… If you talk about high speed, then there is no diesel engine of its capacity to compare with, as in a 1 liter engine(its actually 936 CC) you cant expect it to perform like a 1.3/1.4. I believe GM is fine withe sales of BEAT diesel, as only after the launch of this diesel version beat started to clock around 5000 cars rather it was 1500 on average considering the Petrol/LPG alone.
    so is the EON worth the money that is paid for? or whether it has the best of fuel economy, built, drive ability, ergonomics and cost? I see that its top end model is almost 4.5 lacs in chennai. Do you think eon has a better refinement overall? As a package at their own segments and cost, i feel BEAT is better car than the EON and if you have not driven an EON, please try it once.
    Again coming to the price, the entry model of figo diesel is 5.5 L on road chennai whereas Beat is 5.03, its almost 50K difference and this continues for all the variants. If 50K is not a difference at all, I would like to say that the budget interval between a wagonR(1 Liter VXi) and a Ritz(1.2 Liter LXi) is a meagre 20K. With ABS version of WagonR you need to spend more than the Ritz Lxi. So certainly 50K is a better difference and any consumer will realize on the date of delivery. Beat is better built, good interiors and better plastics than the ford figo and comparing it with Figo itself will solve the purpose of GM’s idea of BEAT diesel. When a car like EON which is noisy and has a vibrating gear lever with a lousy 3 pot IRDE version engine can be tagged at 4.5 lacs why not the beat with good built and better plastics and good steering/clutch assembly with the 1 liter derivation of the famous FIAT engine should not be priced 50K lesser than the competition? On a lighter note, if the engine is approx 500 CC less you want it to be at half price of Figo? :-)

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002582675712 Rocco Hunter

    WTF !! :-/

    according to wt basis is d fiesta worst performer ???
    it has got luks, performance, handling, built quality, gud avg .
    jus bcoz its priced at a bit high price doesnt means dat its an worst performer
    dear writer,
    i think according to u, best cars are bad design, bad handling, poor safety, poor built qualtiy n GOOD MILEAGE + LOW PRICING = BEST CAR !

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    I’ve bookmarked this because I found it interesting. I would be very interested to hear more news on this. Thanks!

    [Reply]

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XAVBIBSZW4ITEUU7A4MJXBIXVU Saahil

    Well, a perfect analysis.. But have a point, instead of going in for the new car, still the best priced cars are now available dirt cheap if you enter the used car market. Whats the harm in having a Honda City of 2009 at under Rs. 5 Lacs.. The car is less driven, maintained and by sure now will attract less depreciation from current price as already 3 -3.5 lacs eroded in first 2 years.. Got the latest stock at:- http://www.usedcarindelhi.com

    [Reply]

  • http://www.facebook.com/kumaril.bhowmick Kumaril Bhowmick

    Maruti Kizashi……. 300 for a maruti car is unforgiving faliure

    [Reply]

  • Krishna

    This writer is correct. One fine morning, we will end up having chunks of Arunachal under chinese. The present govt is stupid and is simply not up to the task. Indian should make a strong link with the US, in the similar fashion as UK. There is real appreciation for India in the US, both the political class and the people. India has been squandering this intent and goodwill.

    [Reply]

  • sanjeeb

    what do u mean….ur comment is vague ……pl be clear to start a discussion……

    [Reply]

  • sanjeeb

    It is only my view….one day we will be over run be china…..our leaders will flee and poor country men/women will be left….may sound ridiculous but it is true….we are surrounded by pakis and Chinese…..our strategists r not up to the mark thinker and our ladders are busy making money…..GOD SAVE US….

    [Reply]

  • PatriotIndian

    The only solution in India is education. If everyone is educated properly and armed with technical usable skills that would solve half the misery in the globe.

    [Reply]

  • junior consultant Daxue

    Thanks for this both informative and insightful article. This is a report I posted recently about the influences, characteristics, and negative effects of FDI in China from foreign countries. you can find it http://daxueconsulting.com/fdi-in-china/, Hope to exchange ideas.

    [Reply]

  • ved

    It was Nehru’s timidity and stupidity that we lost 1962 border skirmish.China was allowed to dictate the battle as well as the ceasefire. It was allowed to withdraw with a medal just as indian army was preparing to meet and challenge the invader.Why did we accept the ceasefire.? We should have continued the conflict. China had no stomach to continue for long. Nehru also had another hunchback-Krishna Menon who coild not distinguish between a revolver and a pistol. With these two jokers at the helm great Indian army had to bite dust. Shame.

    [Reply]

  • AjaySingh

    India need to show the world, how to become part of the emerging world. China is not a treat that we need to contain. China is fighting for her own survival. With every day passing by, China feels trapped and isolated. There is no need to isolate any nation. Competition is always good. Sit like civilized people and divide what products they can have the market for. And what they can provide market as far as Indian products are concerned. In the end, if the business relations are strong enough, there will be no need for containment policy.
    India can never contain any nation other than Andaman Nicobar !
    Don’t even try to think you are pleasing any other nation by writing such articles. No body is stupid these days. Spread fragrance by rich Indian values, that will work in the end as containment.

    [Reply]

    serenity Reply:

    u r right bro!!! ol nations r familiar to the internal structure of india…weak structure of india n i dont know about the containment by china but our nation is definitely going to collapse due to the internal demonic faces of politicians…i hate this phase that indiia is going thru…none is loyal,joblessness,extreme loads of rapes, abducions,extortions n dumb dead eyed police with having control of their balls to their ministers…really F*** them off……

    [Reply]

  • Col. P.S. Sandhu

    All experts who are credible are of the opinion that 2012 is not 1962. India clearly has an edge over China militarily.

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Superb and
    timely article.
    China’s support
    to Pakistan and Sri Lanka does not serve any of China’s interests — except that of encircling India and ‘putting India in her place’. It is reported that the ‘Maoists’ of Nepal are ’surprised’ at China’s cynical ‘power play’ in their country’s internal affairs! China’s chauvinism has brought together Japan,
    Vietnam, Philippines and South Korea. An alarmed Australia has strengthened her military ties with the US — publicly, to warn China. Even Vietnam is warming up to the United States. It is time India
    joins the Asian neighbors and the US in a ‘formal’ alliance. It is
    better to be proactive than regret after the event.

    China’s Indian lobbyists of today do not even have the ‘cover’ of ‘ideology’, their compatriots had in 1962! It is business now!

    [Reply]

  • serenity

    omg..dont compare india to china at least…i cant believe it india being a democratic have left with nothing like democracy..n bro if u believe in facts and figures u can check it out the dam-breaking figures of molestation, rapes,abductions,riots n CORRUPTION…our country is on the peak of declining…china is one of the advanced n developed nations full of justice,law n strength..they dont decieve their citizens by doing scams,disorder in law,,,n a long list….how many scams u heard of them…they dot afraid of the corrupt arsed nations like india…globally indians are disliked nowadays just cus of the illiterates,greedy n brainless politicians mass…

    [Reply]

    Anonymous Reply:

    Have you checked out the figures for crimes in China bro?? Just because you see big buildings and highways doesn’t make a nation a “developed” nation when people still can’t own land or move freely insider their own country!
    LoL full of justice and law ? You mean like how Bo Xilai was so “law abiding” ? Or how Ai Weiwei is treated so “justly” ??
    Just because you are ignorant of the “scams” of China doesn’t mean everybody else is – please do some research on Chine before blindly accepting Chinese communist propaganda.

    First make Facebook and Twitter available legally in China, then tell me how “developed”, “just” and “law abiding” China is!

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Clearly, your knowledge of China is severely limited if you are going to make such ignorant statements.

    India may not be perfect but compared to a nation like China, even an Indian Dalit beggar enjoys 1000 times more rights and dignity in the eyes of the Indian government than even the richest Chinese businessman does in the eyes of China’s government.

    Not even the poorest Indian would ever agree to live in a repressive society like China no matter how much money you pay them – this is why even today Tibetans are escaping to India. And not just Tibetans, followers of Falun Dafa, artists like Ai Weiwei, even a blind man like Chen Guangcheng have tried to escape China and openly criticize their government’s repressive polices that see their people as slaves to exploit for the pride of the Communist party. At least in India, people have legitimate rights that are guaranteed by the constitution, upheld by the courts and bound to the government – in china no such things exist. The government in China can pass any law, seize anybody’s home, force people to live anywhere it wishes and arrest/detain anybody for any length of time without charge!

    To compare the two systems is simply ignorant of all the facts. India may not be perfect and may not be orderly but it is free and it is far more respectful of its citizens than the PRC ever has been!

    The best thing about India is that if you feel that something is wrong, you have the power to change it instead of simply complaining on a forum. You can campaign for change, you can stand for elections and you can enact policies that you believe are right within the bounds of the law. In China, anybody who questions the legitimacy of the Communist party is thrown in jail never to be heard from again.

    [Reply]

    vasant Reply:

    Agree!

    But why the progress in general is so slow?

    Why after 65 years of independence we have to give preferential treatment to some in education , govt. jobs etc?

    Why development schemes are dragging for years?

    Why the treatment is different for different religion/s in case of personal law?

    [Reply]

  • Anonymous

    Yes for the mentally challenged Communist fruitcake – India is the banana republic while the worlds largest open air prison where people are burning themselves alive because they can’t live in that hell hole is “paradise”. Tell me, do you get paid to knuckle pound such rubbish or are you just so far removed from reality that you would do this for free ?
    The only denial here is by trolls like you who are trying desperately to prove that China is “democratic” and “free” ! IF it wasn’t so ridiculous I would pity you!

    [Reply]

  • http://www.captainjohann.blogspot.com/ captainjohann samuhanand

    It is always fashionable to blame Nehru for the defeat in 1962.Our Army was not well trained at all and even today it is becoming something like the US army who inspite of complete air superiority cannot tame Taliabn in Afghanistan. The Chinese soldiers do not use Bhukharies like us in cold regions.They donot expect air support because they plan for war in peace time and build continuously and train continuously .Their communication trenches can accomodate a jeep and their OPs can take a direct hit of a maortar shell while ours is built on sand bags.Our NAVY’S MARCOS COMMANDOES COULD NOT SUBDUE just 4 terrorists in 60 hours at Taj and have to call in NSG commandoes. Today what we should we discuss is how to improve the stamina and training of our troops so that they feel self confident about themselves.There were nearly 70 constables with 303 rifles in CST but could not fire single bullet at Kasab and his buddy. Why? We must think.

    [Reply]

  • fledglingBlogger

    Test

    [Reply]

  • fledglingBlogger

    I cannot understand the claim that Mr.Pilot graduated from Wharton – verity needs checking- I happened to be in a university in close promixity and had heard that he was flunking out – he probably got admitted using the ‘corporate’ quota; but getting through the competitive course wasnt trivial.

    [Reply]

  • Nathan

    China today is not the same as China of 1962. They are certainly focused on the country’s internal development. They want to play their legitimate role internationally. When it comes to India, China unfortunately feels its superiority, and perhaps rightly so because they were smart enough to exploit capitalist countries to invest in their country by liberalizing its economy to attract capital. Even Japan and Taiwan joined this investment rush. They all benefited from this: both the investors and the investment destination. Today This massive investment China has brought in cheap products for consumers and big profits for investors. Naturally others are jealous of their success. True, China has a way of asserting their power and influence wherever it can. Who can blame them? Pakistan loves China because it supported its existence through thick and thin. China also helped Sri Lanka with massive arms in its deadly war against the Tigers. So there are countries that love China. How does that affect India. Look what is happening in the countries that China helps. Pakistan is financially crippled and China’s funds are waisted there. Sri Lanka wants to balance China and India. Myanmar is ready to ditch China. Even North Korea won’t listen to them. So Why should India worry so much?

    [Reply]

  • Ram

    The legacy of Nehru era…the persisting wounds Kashmir.China,India’s pseudo socialist legacy, secularism……..

    [Reply]